Sama S Albairmani, Ahmed Muthana, Tabarek F Mohammed, Mahmood F Al-Zaidy, Oday Atallah, Ahmed Aljuboori, Zaid Aljuboori, Norberto Andaluz, Samer S Hoz
{"title":"联合胸骨前入路:文献综述。","authors":"Sama S Albairmani, Ahmed Muthana, Tabarek F Mohammed, Mahmood F Al-Zaidy, Oday Atallah, Ahmed Aljuboori, Zaid Aljuboori, Norberto Andaluz, Samer S Hoz","doi":"10.25259/SNI_594_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The presigmoid approach represents the standard route to reach the petrous area anterior to the sigmoid sinus. Several lateral skull base approaches have been integrated into this approach for the purpose of widening the window, leading to variable combined approaches and variable terminology. Herein, the authors conducted a systematic review of the literature to simplify understanding of the potential combination of different approaches and their complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were searched on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to include studies describing modifications of the presigmoid approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 27 studies comprising 545 patients. Five combination types applied to the presigmoid approach were identified: Anterior petrosal (Kawase's) approach (Type-1), Supra-tentorial approach (Type-2), Infratemporal fossa approach (Type-3), retrosigmoid approach (Type-4), and Far-lateral suboccipital approach (Type-5). Type-1 combined approach was the commonest type (<i>n</i> = 204, 37.5%), followed by type-2 (<i>n</i> = 197, 36%), type-4 (<i>n</i> = 54, 9.9%), type-5 (<i>n</i> = 51, 9.4%), and type-3 (<i>n</i> = 39, 7.2%). Meningioma was the typical target lesion in all types except type 3, where it is solely used for paraganglioma. The petroclival region was the prevalent access location in all the types of combined presigmoid approaches (type-1, 92%; type-2, 95%; type-3, 100%; type-4, 59%; and type-5, 64%). The intraoperative lateral patient position was dominantly utilized in type-1, type-3, and type-5 approaches (65%, 100%, and 100%, respectively), while park-bench was the most common position in type-2 (36%) and type-4 (100%) approaches. Overall, all types exhibited good outcomes in the form of gross total resection of the lesion and the absence of surgical complications in the follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Presigmoid approaches are becoming increasingly complex with the application and integration of the lateral skull base approaches, resulting in broadening the surgical field and easy access to the targeted lesions. The importance of designing a comprehensive nomenclature of the combined presigmoid approaches may add distinctive contributions to the growing knowledge of neurosurgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":94217,"journal":{"name":"Surgical neurology international","volume":"15 ","pages":"342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11450886/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined presigmoid approach: A literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Sama S Albairmani, Ahmed Muthana, Tabarek F Mohammed, Mahmood F Al-Zaidy, Oday Atallah, Ahmed Aljuboori, Zaid Aljuboori, Norberto Andaluz, Samer S Hoz\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/SNI_594_2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The presigmoid approach represents the standard route to reach the petrous area anterior to the sigmoid sinus. Several lateral skull base approaches have been integrated into this approach for the purpose of widening the window, leading to variable combined approaches and variable terminology. Herein, the authors conducted a systematic review of the literature to simplify understanding of the potential combination of different approaches and their complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were searched on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to include studies describing modifications of the presigmoid approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 27 studies comprising 545 patients. Five combination types applied to the presigmoid approach were identified: Anterior petrosal (Kawase's) approach (Type-1), Supra-tentorial approach (Type-2), Infratemporal fossa approach (Type-3), retrosigmoid approach (Type-4), and Far-lateral suboccipital approach (Type-5). Type-1 combined approach was the commonest type (<i>n</i> = 204, 37.5%), followed by type-2 (<i>n</i> = 197, 36%), type-4 (<i>n</i> = 54, 9.9%), type-5 (<i>n</i> = 51, 9.4%), and type-3 (<i>n</i> = 39, 7.2%). Meningioma was the typical target lesion in all types except type 3, where it is solely used for paraganglioma. The petroclival region was the prevalent access location in all the types of combined presigmoid approaches (type-1, 92%; type-2, 95%; type-3, 100%; type-4, 59%; and type-5, 64%). The intraoperative lateral patient position was dominantly utilized in type-1, type-3, and type-5 approaches (65%, 100%, and 100%, respectively), while park-bench was the most common position in type-2 (36%) and type-4 (100%) approaches. Overall, all types exhibited good outcomes in the form of gross total resection of the lesion and the absence of surgical complications in the follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Presigmoid approaches are becoming increasingly complex with the application and integration of the lateral skull base approaches, resulting in broadening the surgical field and easy access to the targeted lesions. The importance of designing a comprehensive nomenclature of the combined presigmoid approaches may add distinctive contributions to the growing knowledge of neurosurgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical neurology international\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"342\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11450886/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical neurology international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_594_2024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical neurology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_594_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:乙状窦前入路是到达乙状窦前枕部的标准路径。为了扩大手术窗口,有几种侧颅底入路被整合到这一入路中,导致了不同的联合入路和不同的术语。在此,作者对文献进行了系统性回顾,以简化对不同方法的潜在组合及其并发症的理解:方法:根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》指南,对 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Web of Science 数据库进行检索,以纳入描述乙状结肠前入路改良方法的研究:结果:我们共纳入了 27 项研究,包括 545 名患者。确定了应用于蝶骨前入路的五种组合类型:前枕(川濑)入路(Type-1)、胸骨上入路(Type-2)、颞下窝入路(Type-3)、后蝶骨入路(Type-4)和远外侧枕下入路(Type-5)。1型联合方法是最常见的类型(204例,37.5%),其次是2型(197例,36%)、4型(54例,9.9%)、5型(51例,9.4%)和3型(39例,7.2%)。除 3 型仅用于副神经节瘤外,脑膜瘤是所有类型的典型靶病变。在所有类型的蝶鞍前联合入路中,瓣膜区域是最常见的入路位置(类型1,92%;类型2,95%;类型3,100%;类型4,59%;类型5,64%)。1型、3型和5型方法主要采用患者术中侧卧位(分别为65%、100%和100%),而2型(36%)和4型(100%)方法中最常见的体位是公园椅。总体而言,所有类型的手术都取得了良好的效果,即病灶全部切除,且随访中无手术并发症:结论:随着颅底外侧入路的应用和整合,颅前入路正变得越来越复杂,从而拓宽了手术视野,并方便了目标病灶的入路。为综合蝶鞍前入路设计一个全面的术语非常重要,可为不断增长的神经外科知识做出独特的贡献。
Combined presigmoid approach: A literature review.
Background: The presigmoid approach represents the standard route to reach the petrous area anterior to the sigmoid sinus. Several lateral skull base approaches have been integrated into this approach for the purpose of widening the window, leading to variable combined approaches and variable terminology. Herein, the authors conducted a systematic review of the literature to simplify understanding of the potential combination of different approaches and their complications.
Methods: PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases were searched on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to include studies describing modifications of the presigmoid approach.
Results: We included 27 studies comprising 545 patients. Five combination types applied to the presigmoid approach were identified: Anterior petrosal (Kawase's) approach (Type-1), Supra-tentorial approach (Type-2), Infratemporal fossa approach (Type-3), retrosigmoid approach (Type-4), and Far-lateral suboccipital approach (Type-5). Type-1 combined approach was the commonest type (n = 204, 37.5%), followed by type-2 (n = 197, 36%), type-4 (n = 54, 9.9%), type-5 (n = 51, 9.4%), and type-3 (n = 39, 7.2%). Meningioma was the typical target lesion in all types except type 3, where it is solely used for paraganglioma. The petroclival region was the prevalent access location in all the types of combined presigmoid approaches (type-1, 92%; type-2, 95%; type-3, 100%; type-4, 59%; and type-5, 64%). The intraoperative lateral patient position was dominantly utilized in type-1, type-3, and type-5 approaches (65%, 100%, and 100%, respectively), while park-bench was the most common position in type-2 (36%) and type-4 (100%) approaches. Overall, all types exhibited good outcomes in the form of gross total resection of the lesion and the absence of surgical complications in the follow-up.
Conclusion: Presigmoid approaches are becoming increasingly complex with the application and integration of the lateral skull base approaches, resulting in broadening the surgical field and easy access to the targeted lesions. The importance of designing a comprehensive nomenclature of the combined presigmoid approaches may add distinctive contributions to the growing knowledge of neurosurgery.