{"title":"挑战现状,提高临床前肿瘤学研究的转化潜力","authors":"Kate Connor, Anna Golebiewska, Annette T. Byrne","doi":"10.1038/s41568-024-00756-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The precision medicine era has precipitated inherent new challenges to the preclinical tumour biology field. Overall, continued poor clinical translatability of preclinical studies highlights the need to disrupt the status quo. Well-characterized models, ideally established in the orthotopic setting and, where feasible, treated with classical standard-of-care regimens, are mandated. In this Comment, Connor et al. discuss how the continued poor clinical translatability of preclinical studies highlights the need to mandate well-characterized models, ideally established in the orthotopic setting and, where feasible, treated with classical standard-of-care regimens.","PeriodicalId":19055,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Cancer","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":72.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenging the status quo to improve the translational potential of preclinical oncology studies\",\"authors\":\"Kate Connor, Anna Golebiewska, Annette T. Byrne\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41568-024-00756-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The precision medicine era has precipitated inherent new challenges to the preclinical tumour biology field. Overall, continued poor clinical translatability of preclinical studies highlights the need to disrupt the status quo. Well-characterized models, ideally established in the orthotopic setting and, where feasible, treated with classical standard-of-care regimens, are mandated. In this Comment, Connor et al. discuss how the continued poor clinical translatability of preclinical studies highlights the need to mandate well-characterized models, ideally established in the orthotopic setting and, where feasible, treated with classical standard-of-care regimens.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Reviews Cancer\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":72.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Reviews Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-024-00756-w\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-024-00756-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Challenging the status quo to improve the translational potential of preclinical oncology studies
The precision medicine era has precipitated inherent new challenges to the preclinical tumour biology field. Overall, continued poor clinical translatability of preclinical studies highlights the need to disrupt the status quo. Well-characterized models, ideally established in the orthotopic setting and, where feasible, treated with classical standard-of-care regimens, are mandated. In this Comment, Connor et al. discuss how the continued poor clinical translatability of preclinical studies highlights the need to mandate well-characterized models, ideally established in the orthotopic setting and, where feasible, treated with classical standard-of-care regimens.
期刊介绍:
Nature Reviews Cancer, a part of the Nature Reviews portfolio of journals, aims to be the premier source of reviews and commentaries for the scientific communities it serves. The correct abbreviation for abstracting and indexing purposes is Nat. Rev. Cancer. The international standard serial numbers (ISSN) for Nature Reviews Cancer are 1474-175X (print) and 1474-1768 (online). Unlike other journals, Nature Reviews Cancer does not have an external editorial board. Instead, all editorial decisions are made by a team of full-time professional editors who are PhD-level scientists. The journal publishes Research Highlights, Comments, Reviews, and Perspectives relevant to cancer researchers, ensuring that the articles reach the widest possible audience due to their broad scope.