基于代谢组学鉴别陶器吸附的谷物残渣

IF 3.2 1区 历史学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1007/s10816-024-09667-4
Lei Lu, Rui Wen, Junjun Cui
{"title":"基于代谢组学鉴别陶器吸附的谷物残渣","authors":"Lei Lu, Rui Wen, Junjun Cui","doi":"10.1007/s10816-024-09667-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cereal remains are common and important archaeological finds, providing crucial evidence for the origin and development of agriculture. Many previous studies have utilized one or several molecules as biomarkers to identify archaeological remains. However, there is a lack of systematic research on characteristic metabolites of common grains, especially of ancient varieties. The goal of this study was to derive a series of more species-indicative biomarkers using untargeted metabolomics as well as provide new insights into the identification of cereal remains excavated in archaeology. First, modern cereal, pottery and archeological samples were used for untargeted metabolomics to obtain plant metabolites. Then, statistical analyses were employed to screen candidate biomarkers. It was determined there are 73, 42, 138 and 58 metabolites representing broomcorn millet, foxtail millet, wheat and rice, respectively. Among the compounds mentioned above, 33 were found to be present in the archaeological samples from the Dongxiafeng site dating back around 3600 years. These 33 biomarkers would serve as characteristic elements for systematic clustering. The results indicated that among pottery sherds from the Dongxiafeng site, the most likely processed cereal is foxtail millet, and the least likely processed cereal is wheat. The theoretical calculated proportions of four grains are as follows: broomcorn millet 26%; foxtail millet 51%; wheat 18%; rice 5%. This aligns with the agricultural tradition in this region during the early Bronze Age, characterized by dryland farming with a focus on foxtail millet and broomcorn millet, while rice and wheat were also introduced.</p>","PeriodicalId":47725,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discrimination of Cereal Residue Adsorbed by Pottery Based on Metabolomics\",\"authors\":\"Lei Lu, Rui Wen, Junjun Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10816-024-09667-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Cereal remains are common and important archaeological finds, providing crucial evidence for the origin and development of agriculture. Many previous studies have utilized one or several molecules as biomarkers to identify archaeological remains. However, there is a lack of systematic research on characteristic metabolites of common grains, especially of ancient varieties. The goal of this study was to derive a series of more species-indicative biomarkers using untargeted metabolomics as well as provide new insights into the identification of cereal remains excavated in archaeology. First, modern cereal, pottery and archeological samples were used for untargeted metabolomics to obtain plant metabolites. Then, statistical analyses were employed to screen candidate biomarkers. It was determined there are 73, 42, 138 and 58 metabolites representing broomcorn millet, foxtail millet, wheat and rice, respectively. Among the compounds mentioned above, 33 were found to be present in the archaeological samples from the Dongxiafeng site dating back around 3600 years. These 33 biomarkers would serve as characteristic elements for systematic clustering. The results indicated that among pottery sherds from the Dongxiafeng site, the most likely processed cereal is foxtail millet, and the least likely processed cereal is wheat. The theoretical calculated proportions of four grains are as follows: broomcorn millet 26%; foxtail millet 51%; wheat 18%; rice 5%. This aligns with the agricultural tradition in this region during the early Bronze Age, characterized by dryland farming with a focus on foxtail millet and broomcorn millet, while rice and wheat were also introduced.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-024-09667-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-024-09667-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

谷物遗骸是常见的重要考古发现,为农业的起源和发展提供了重要证据。以前的许多研究利用一种或几种分子作为生物标记来鉴定考古遗存。然而,对普通谷物,尤其是古代谷物的特征代谢物缺乏系统的研究。本研究的目标是利用非靶向代谢组学方法得出一系列更具物种指示性的生物标记物,并为考古发掘中谷物遗存的鉴定提供新的见解。首先,利用现代谷物、陶器和考古样本进行非靶向代谢组学研究,以获得植物代谢物。然后,利用统计分析筛选候选生物标志物。结果表明,代表黍、狐尾稷、小麦和水稻的代谢物分别有 73、42、138 和 58 种。在上述化合物中,发现有 33 种存在于距今约 3600 年的东峡峰遗址考古样本中。这 33 种生物标志物将作为系统聚类的特征元素。结果表明,在东峡峰遗址出土的陶片中,最有可能加工的谷物是狐尾黍,最不可能加工的谷物是小麦。四种谷物的理论计算比例如下:秫 26%;狐尾粟 51%;小麦 18%;稻 5%。这与该地区青铜时代早期的农业传统相吻合,其特点是以狐尾黍和秫为主的旱地农业,同时也引入了水稻和小麦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Discrimination of Cereal Residue Adsorbed by Pottery Based on Metabolomics

Cereal remains are common and important archaeological finds, providing crucial evidence for the origin and development of agriculture. Many previous studies have utilized one or several molecules as biomarkers to identify archaeological remains. However, there is a lack of systematic research on characteristic metabolites of common grains, especially of ancient varieties. The goal of this study was to derive a series of more species-indicative biomarkers using untargeted metabolomics as well as provide new insights into the identification of cereal remains excavated in archaeology. First, modern cereal, pottery and archeological samples were used for untargeted metabolomics to obtain plant metabolites. Then, statistical analyses were employed to screen candidate biomarkers. It was determined there are 73, 42, 138 and 58 metabolites representing broomcorn millet, foxtail millet, wheat and rice, respectively. Among the compounds mentioned above, 33 were found to be present in the archaeological samples from the Dongxiafeng site dating back around 3600 years. These 33 biomarkers would serve as characteristic elements for systematic clustering. The results indicated that among pottery sherds from the Dongxiafeng site, the most likely processed cereal is foxtail millet, and the least likely processed cereal is wheat. The theoretical calculated proportions of four grains are as follows: broomcorn millet 26%; foxtail millet 51%; wheat 18%; rice 5%. This aligns with the agricultural tradition in this region during the early Bronze Age, characterized by dryland farming with a focus on foxtail millet and broomcorn millet, while rice and wheat were also introduced.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, the leading journal in its field,  presents original articles that address method- or theory-focused issues of current archaeological interest and represent significant explorations on the cutting edge of the discipline.   The journal also welcomes topical syntheses that critically assess and integrate research on a specific subject in archaeological method or theory, as well as examinations of the history of archaeology.    Written by experts, the articles benefit an international audience of archaeologists, students of archaeology, and practitioners of closely related disciplines.  Specific topics covered in recent issues include:  the use of nitche construction theory in archaeology,  new developments in the use of soil chemistry in archaeological interpretation, and a model for the prehistoric development of clothing.  The Journal''s distinguished Editorial Board includes archaeologists with worldwide archaeological knowledge (the Americas, Asia and the Pacific, Europe, and Africa), and expertise in a wide range of methodological and theoretical issues.  Rated ''A'' in the European Reference Index for the Humanities (ERIH) Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory is rated ''A'' in the ERIH, a new reference index that aims to help evenly access the scientific quality of Humanities research output. For more information visit: http://www.esf.org/research-areas/humanities/activities/research-infrastructures.html Rated ''A'' in the Australian Research Council Humanities and Creative Arts Journal List.  For more information, visit: http://www.arc.gov.au/era/journal_list_dev.htm
期刊最新文献
A Burning Platform? Critical Reflections on the Impact of Research on the Developing Bioarchaeology of Cremation Modeling Marronage: GIS Heuristics of Refuge Affordances in Colonial St. Croix Taphonomic Approach to the Interpretation of Isolated Human Skulls: Distinguishing Natural from Intentional Deposition The Taphonomy of Status: The Creation of Group Identity and Social Inequality in Medieval Croatia Confronting Taphonomic Challenges from Excavation Through Curation of Human Remains
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1