自动 CT 灌注软件在大血管和中血管闭塞的急性缺血性中风中的应用。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1002/acn3.52207
Rezan Ashayeri Ahmadabad, Kim H Tran, Yiran Zhang, Mahesh P Kate, Sachin Mishra, Brian H Buck, Khurshid A Khan, Jeremy Rempel, Gregory W Albers, Ashfaq Shuaib
{"title":"自动 CT 灌注软件在大血管和中血管闭塞的急性缺血性中风中的应用。","authors":"Rezan Ashayeri Ahmadabad, Kim H Tran, Yiran Zhang, Mahesh P Kate, Sachin Mishra, Brian H Buck, Khurshid A Khan, Jeremy Rempel, Gregory W Albers, Ashfaq Shuaib","doi":"10.1002/acn3.52207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early diagnosis of large vessel occlusion (LVO) in acute stroke often requires CT angiography (CTA). Automated CT perfusion (CTP) software, which identifies blood flow abnormalities, enhances LVO diagnosis and patient selection for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). This study evaluates the sensitivity of automated CTP images in detecting perfusion abnormalities in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and LVO or medium vessel occlusion (MeVO), compared to CTA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We screened acute ischemic stroke patients presenting within 24 h who underwent CT, CTA, and CTP as per institutional protocol. RAPID AI software processed CTP images, while neuroradiologists reviewed CTA for intracranial arterial occlusions. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of automated CTP maps in detecting occlusions were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 790 screened patients, 31 were excluded due to lack of RAPID CTP data or poor-quality scans, leaving 759 for analysis. The median age was 71 years (IQR: 61-81), with 47% female. Among them, 678 had AIS, and 81 had AIS ruled out. CTA identified arterial occlusion in 562 patients (74%), with corresponding CTP abnormalities in 537 patients (Tmax > 6 sec). In the 197 without occlusion, CTP was negative in 161. Automated CTP maps had a sensitivity of 95.55% (CI 95: 93.50-97.10%), specificity of 81.73% (CI 95: 75.61-86.86%), negative predictive value of 98.22% (CI 95: 97.39-98.79%), positive predictive value of 63.54% (CI 95: 56.46-70.09%), and overall accuracy of 85.18% (CI 95: 82.45-87.64%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automated CTP maps demonstrated high sensitivity and negative predictive value for LVOs and MeVOs, suggesting their usefulness as a rapid diagnostic tool, especially in settings without expert neuroradiologists.</p>","PeriodicalId":126,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"2967-2976"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acn3.52207","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of automated CT perfusion software in acute ischemic stroke with large and medium vessel occlusion.\",\"authors\":\"Rezan Ashayeri Ahmadabad, Kim H Tran, Yiran Zhang, Mahesh P Kate, Sachin Mishra, Brian H Buck, Khurshid A Khan, Jeremy Rempel, Gregory W Albers, Ashfaq Shuaib\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acn3.52207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early diagnosis of large vessel occlusion (LVO) in acute stroke often requires CT angiography (CTA). Automated CT perfusion (CTP) software, which identifies blood flow abnormalities, enhances LVO diagnosis and patient selection for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). This study evaluates the sensitivity of automated CTP images in detecting perfusion abnormalities in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and LVO or medium vessel occlusion (MeVO), compared to CTA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We screened acute ischemic stroke patients presenting within 24 h who underwent CT, CTA, and CTP as per institutional protocol. RAPID AI software processed CTP images, while neuroradiologists reviewed CTA for intracranial arterial occlusions. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of automated CTP maps in detecting occlusions were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 790 screened patients, 31 were excluded due to lack of RAPID CTP data or poor-quality scans, leaving 759 for analysis. The median age was 71 years (IQR: 61-81), with 47% female. Among them, 678 had AIS, and 81 had AIS ruled out. CTA identified arterial occlusion in 562 patients (74%), with corresponding CTP abnormalities in 537 patients (Tmax > 6 sec). In the 197 without occlusion, CTP was negative in 161. Automated CTP maps had a sensitivity of 95.55% (CI 95: 93.50-97.10%), specificity of 81.73% (CI 95: 75.61-86.86%), negative predictive value of 98.22% (CI 95: 97.39-98.79%), positive predictive value of 63.54% (CI 95: 56.46-70.09%), and overall accuracy of 85.18% (CI 95: 82.45-87.64%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Automated CTP maps demonstrated high sensitivity and negative predictive value for LVOs and MeVOs, suggesting their usefulness as a rapid diagnostic tool, especially in settings without expert neuroradiologists.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2967-2976\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acn3.52207\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.52207\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.52207","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性中风大血管闭塞(LVO)的早期诊断通常需要 CT 血管造影术(CTA)。自动 CT 灌注(CTP)软件可识别血流异常,从而加强 LVO 诊断和血管内血栓切除术(EVT)的患者选择。与 CTA 相比,本研究评估了自动 CTP 图像在检测急性缺血性卒中(AIS)和 LVO 或中血管闭塞(MeVO)患者灌注异常方面的灵敏度:我们筛选了 24 小时内就诊的急性缺血性脑卒中患者,这些患者按照机构规定接受了 CT、CTA 和 CTP 检查。RAPID AI 软件处理 CTP 图像,而神经放射科医生则对 CTA 进行颅内动脉闭塞检查。对自动 CTP 图检测闭塞的敏感性、特异性和准确性进行了评估:在 790 名接受筛查的患者中,31 人因缺乏 RAPID CTP 数据或扫描质量不佳而被排除,剩下 759 人接受分析。中位年龄为 71 岁(IQR:61-81),女性占 47%。其中 678 人患有 AIS,81 人排除了 AIS。CTA 发现 562 名患者(74%)存在动脉闭塞,537 名患者存在相应的 CTP 异常(Tmax > 6 秒)。在 197 名没有闭塞的患者中,161 人的 CTP 为阴性。自动 CTP 地图的敏感性为 95.55%(CI 95:93.50-97.10%),特异性为 81.73%(CI 95:75.61-86.86%),阴性预测值为 98.22%(CI 95:97.39-98.79%),阳性预测值为 63.54%(CI 95:56.46-70.09%),总体准确性为 85.18%(CI 95:82.45-87.64%):自动CTP图显示了对LVOs和MeVOs的高灵敏度和阴性预测值,表明其作为快速诊断工具的实用性,尤其是在没有神经放射专家的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Utility of automated CT perfusion software in acute ischemic stroke with large and medium vessel occlusion.

Background: Early diagnosis of large vessel occlusion (LVO) in acute stroke often requires CT angiography (CTA). Automated CT perfusion (CTP) software, which identifies blood flow abnormalities, enhances LVO diagnosis and patient selection for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). This study evaluates the sensitivity of automated CTP images in detecting perfusion abnormalities in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and LVO or medium vessel occlusion (MeVO), compared to CTA.

Methods: We screened acute ischemic stroke patients presenting within 24 h who underwent CT, CTA, and CTP as per institutional protocol. RAPID AI software processed CTP images, while neuroradiologists reviewed CTA for intracranial arterial occlusions. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of automated CTP maps in detecting occlusions were assessed.

Results: Of 790 screened patients, 31 were excluded due to lack of RAPID CTP data or poor-quality scans, leaving 759 for analysis. The median age was 71 years (IQR: 61-81), with 47% female. Among them, 678 had AIS, and 81 had AIS ruled out. CTA identified arterial occlusion in 562 patients (74%), with corresponding CTP abnormalities in 537 patients (Tmax > 6 sec). In the 197 without occlusion, CTP was negative in 161. Automated CTP maps had a sensitivity of 95.55% (CI 95: 93.50-97.10%), specificity of 81.73% (CI 95: 75.61-86.86%), negative predictive value of 98.22% (CI 95: 97.39-98.79%), positive predictive value of 63.54% (CI 95: 56.46-70.09%), and overall accuracy of 85.18% (CI 95: 82.45-87.64%).

Conclusions: Automated CTP maps demonstrated high sensitivity and negative predictive value for LVOs and MeVOs, suggesting their usefulness as a rapid diagnostic tool, especially in settings without expert neuroradiologists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
1.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology is a peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of high-quality research related to all areas of neurology. The journal publishes original research and scholarly reviews focused on the mechanisms and treatments of diseases of the nervous system; high-impact topics in neurologic education; and other topics of interest to the clinical neuroscience community.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Comprehensive multicentre retrospective analysis for predicting isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant lower-grade gliomas. Determinants of long-term paramagnetic rim lesion evolution in people with multiple sclerosis. Dopaminergic therapy disrupts decision-making in impulsive-compulsive Parkinsonian patients. Incremental clinical value of intraplaque neovascularization in predicting recurrent ischemic stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1