经颅直流电刺激作为对有自杀意念的急性双相抑郁症患者的附加试验治疗的有效性和安全性。

IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1111/cns.70077
Dandan Wang, Xiaonan Guo, Qi Huang, Zhong Wang, Jingkai Chen, Shaohua Hu
{"title":"经颅直流电刺激作为对有自杀意念的急性双相抑郁症患者的附加试验治疗的有效性和安全性。","authors":"Dandan Wang,&nbsp;Xiaonan Guo,&nbsp;Qi Huang,&nbsp;Zhong Wang,&nbsp;Jingkai Chen,&nbsp;Shaohua Hu","doi":"10.1111/cns.70077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Bipolar depression poses an overwhelming suicide risk. We aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with quetiapine in bipolar patients as a suicidal intervention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In a single-center, double-blind, treatment-naive bipolar depression patients with suicidal ideation were randomly assigned to quetiapine in combination with either active (<i>n</i> = 16) or sham (<i>n</i> = 15) tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for three consecutive weeks. The 30-min, 2-mA tDCS was conducted twice a day on the weekday of the first week and then once a day on the weekdays of the two following weeks. Primary efficacy outcome measure was the change in the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSSI). Secondary outcomes included changes on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Outcome was evaluated on Day 3 and weekend. Safety outcome was based on the reported adverse reactions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Active tDCS was superior to sham tDCS on the BSSI at Day 3 and tended to sustain every weekend during the treatment process, compared to baseline. However, no difference between active and sham in HDRS-17 and MADRS was found. Response and remission rate also supported the antisuicide effect of tDCS, with higher response and remission rate in BSSI, but no antidepressant effect, compared to sham, over time. Regarding safety, active tDCS was well tolerated and all the adverse reactions reported were mild and limited to transient scalp discomfort.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The tDCS was effective as an antisuicide treatment for acute bipolar depression patients with suicidal ideation, with minimal side effects reported.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":154,"journal":{"name":"CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics","volume":"30 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11464394/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as an Add-On Trial Treatment for Acute Bipolar Depression Patients With Suicidal Ideation\",\"authors\":\"Dandan Wang,&nbsp;Xiaonan Guo,&nbsp;Qi Huang,&nbsp;Zhong Wang,&nbsp;Jingkai Chen,&nbsp;Shaohua Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cns.70077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>Bipolar depression poses an overwhelming suicide risk. We aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with quetiapine in bipolar patients as a suicidal intervention.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In a single-center, double-blind, treatment-naive bipolar depression patients with suicidal ideation were randomly assigned to quetiapine in combination with either active (<i>n</i> = 16) or sham (<i>n</i> = 15) tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for three consecutive weeks. The 30-min, 2-mA tDCS was conducted twice a day on the weekday of the first week and then once a day on the weekdays of the two following weeks. Primary efficacy outcome measure was the change in the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSSI). Secondary outcomes included changes on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Outcome was evaluated on Day 3 and weekend. Safety outcome was based on the reported adverse reactions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Active tDCS was superior to sham tDCS on the BSSI at Day 3 and tended to sustain every weekend during the treatment process, compared to baseline. However, no difference between active and sham in HDRS-17 and MADRS was found. Response and remission rate also supported the antisuicide effect of tDCS, with higher response and remission rate in BSSI, but no antidepressant effect, compared to sham, over time. Regarding safety, active tDCS was well tolerated and all the adverse reactions reported were mild and limited to transient scalp discomfort.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The tDCS was effective as an antisuicide treatment for acute bipolar depression patients with suicidal ideation, with minimal side effects reported.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\"30 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11464394/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cns.70077\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cns.70077","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:双相抑郁症具有极大的自杀风险。我们旨在研究经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)联合喹硫平对双相抑郁症患者进行自杀干预的有效性和安全性:在一项单中心双盲研究中,有自杀意念的双相抑郁症患者被随机分配接受喹硫平联合左侧背外侧前额叶皮层活性(n = 16)或假性(n = 15)tDCS治疗,连续治疗三周。第一周的工作日每天进行两次,每次 30 分钟,每次 2 毫安,随后两周的工作日每天进行一次。主要疗效指标是贝克自杀意念量表(BSSI)的变化。次要结果包括 17 项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS-17)和蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)的变化。结果在第 3 天和周末进行评估。安全性结果基于报告的不良反应:结果:与基线相比,在第 3 天的 BSSI 上,活性 tDCS 优于假性 tDCS,并且在治疗过程中的每个周末,活性 tDCS 的疗效都趋于持续。然而,在 HDRS-17 和 MADRS 方面,活性和假性没有差异。反应和缓解率也支持 tDCS 的抗自杀效果,随着时间的推移,BSSI 的反应和缓解率更高,但与假体相比,没有抗抑郁效果。在安全性方面,主动tDCS的耐受性良好,所有不良反应都很轻微,仅限于短暂的头皮不适:tDCS对有自杀意念的急性双相抑郁症患者的抗自杀治疗有效,且副作用极小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as an Add-On Trial Treatment for Acute Bipolar Depression Patients With Suicidal Ideation

Aims

Bipolar depression poses an overwhelming suicide risk. We aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with quetiapine in bipolar patients as a suicidal intervention.

Methods

In a single-center, double-blind, treatment-naive bipolar depression patients with suicidal ideation were randomly assigned to quetiapine in combination with either active (n = 16) or sham (n = 15) tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for three consecutive weeks. The 30-min, 2-mA tDCS was conducted twice a day on the weekday of the first week and then once a day on the weekdays of the two following weeks. Primary efficacy outcome measure was the change in the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSSI). Secondary outcomes included changes on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Outcome was evaluated on Day 3 and weekend. Safety outcome was based on the reported adverse reactions.

Results

Active tDCS was superior to sham tDCS on the BSSI at Day 3 and tended to sustain every weekend during the treatment process, compared to baseline. However, no difference between active and sham in HDRS-17 and MADRS was found. Response and remission rate also supported the antisuicide effect of tDCS, with higher response and remission rate in BSSI, but no antidepressant effect, compared to sham, over time. Regarding safety, active tDCS was well tolerated and all the adverse reactions reported were mild and limited to transient scalp discomfort.

Conclusion

The tDCS was effective as an antisuicide treatment for acute bipolar depression patients with suicidal ideation, with minimal side effects reported.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
12.70%
发文量
240
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics provides a medium for rapid publication of original clinical, experimental, and translational research papers, timely reviews and reports of novel findings of therapeutic relevance to the central nervous system, as well as papers related to clinical pharmacology, drug development and novel methodologies for drug evaluation. The journal focuses on neurological and psychiatric diseases such as stroke, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, depression, schizophrenia, epilepsy, and drug abuse.
期刊最新文献
Lycium barbarum Extract Enhanced Neuroplasticity and Functional Recovery in 5xFAD Mice via Modulating Microglial Status of the Central Nervous System 9-Methylfascaplysin Prevents Neuroinflammation and Synaptic Damage via Cell-Specific Inhibition of Kinases in APP/PS1 Transgenic Mice The Abnormal Proliferation of Midbrain Dopamine Cells From Human Pluripotent Stem Cells Is Induced by Exposure to the Tumor Microenvironment Selective Inhibition of P2Y1 and P2Y12 Receptor Signal Pathways in Platelet Aggregation in Transgenic Cell Lines and Rats by Potassium 2-(1-Hydroxypentyl)-Benzoate, Puerarin and Salvianolic Acid B Olaparib Enhances the Efficacy of Third-Generation Oncolytic Adenoviruses Against Glioblastoma by Modulating DNA Damage Response and p66shc-Induced Apoptosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1