无家可归和精神障碍患者的服务参与度:呼吁以人为本的创新。

Vicky Stergiopoulos, Nick Kerman, Nadine Reid
{"title":"无家可归和精神障碍患者的服务参与度:呼吁以人为本的创新。","authors":"Vicky Stergiopoulos, Nick Kerman, Nadine Reid","doi":"10.1007/s10488-024-01418-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, there has been increased support for the use of coercive policies to address the seemingly intractable problem of homelessness among people with mental disorders in North America. Although these policy approaches respond to a critical issue, rising rates of unsheltered homelessness, low service engagement and concerns about disruptive behaviors in public settings, they are unlikely on their own to be successful. To avoid coercive practices, there is an urgent need to consider alternative, person-centred approaches to promote service engagement among people experiencing homelessness and mental disorders, with input from those with lived experience and frontline homeless service providers. Three person-centred approaches are proposed for consideration: (1) cross-sectoral service delivery models, (2) peer-led services, and (3) financial incentives. These approaches merit further study to support voluntary treatment engagement and exits from homelessness among people with mental and substance use disorders and safeguard the human rights of this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":7195,"journal":{"name":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Service Engagement Among People Experiencing Homelessness and Mental Disorders: A Call for Person-centred Innovations.\",\"authors\":\"Vicky Stergiopoulos, Nick Kerman, Nadine Reid\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10488-024-01418-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In recent years, there has been increased support for the use of coercive policies to address the seemingly intractable problem of homelessness among people with mental disorders in North America. Although these policy approaches respond to a critical issue, rising rates of unsheltered homelessness, low service engagement and concerns about disruptive behaviors in public settings, they are unlikely on their own to be successful. To avoid coercive practices, there is an urgent need to consider alternative, person-centred approaches to promote service engagement among people experiencing homelessness and mental disorders, with input from those with lived experience and frontline homeless service providers. Three person-centred approaches are proposed for consideration: (1) cross-sectoral service delivery models, (2) peer-led services, and (3) financial incentives. These approaches merit further study to support voluntary treatment engagement and exits from homelessness among people with mental and substance use disorders and safeguard the human rights of this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-024-01418-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-024-01418-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,越来越多的人支持使用强制政策来解决北美精神障碍患者无家可归这一看似棘手的问题。虽然这些政策方法是为了解决一个关键问题,即无家可归者的比例不断上升、服务参与度低以及对公共场所破坏性行为的担忧,但单靠这些方法是不可能取得成功的。为了避免胁迫性做法,迫切需要考虑其他以人为本的方法,以促进无家可归者和精神失常者参与服务,并听取有生活经验者和一线无家可归者服务提供者的意见。建议考虑三种以人为本的方法:(1)跨部门服务提供模式,(2)同伴引导服务,以及(3)经济激励。这些方法值得进一步研究,以支持精神障碍和药物使用障碍患者自愿接受治疗和摆脱无家可归状态,并保障这一人群的人权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Service Engagement Among People Experiencing Homelessness and Mental Disorders: A Call for Person-centred Innovations.

In recent years, there has been increased support for the use of coercive policies to address the seemingly intractable problem of homelessness among people with mental disorders in North America. Although these policy approaches respond to a critical issue, rising rates of unsheltered homelessness, low service engagement and concerns about disruptive behaviors in public settings, they are unlikely on their own to be successful. To avoid coercive practices, there is an urgent need to consider alternative, person-centred approaches to promote service engagement among people experiencing homelessness and mental disorders, with input from those with lived experience and frontline homeless service providers. Three person-centred approaches are proposed for consideration: (1) cross-sectoral service delivery models, (2) peer-led services, and (3) financial incentives. These approaches merit further study to support voluntary treatment engagement and exits from homelessness among people with mental and substance use disorders and safeguard the human rights of this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The aim of Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services is to improve mental health services through research. This journal primarily publishes peer-reviewed, original empirical research articles.  The journal also welcomes systematic reviews. Please contact the editor if you have suggestions for special issues or sections focusing on important contemporary issues.  The journal usually does not publish articles on drug or alcohol addiction unless it focuses on persons who are dually diagnosed. Manuscripts on children and adults are equally welcome. Topics for articles may include, but need not be limited to, effectiveness of services, measure development, economics of mental health services, managed mental health care, implementation of services, staffing, leadership, organizational relations and policy, and the like.  Please review previously published articles for fit with our journal before submitting your manuscript.
期刊最新文献
Strategic Treatment and Assessment for Youth (STAY): A Theoretically-Driven, Culturally-Tailored MBC Approach. A Model for Understanding Lived Expertise to Support Effective Recruitment of Peer Roles. Life After EBPs: Characterizing Subsequent Engagement in Evidence-Based Psychotherapy After Completion of an Initial Trauma-Focused EBP in a National Sample of VA Patients. Should We Use Clinician Self-Report to Tailor Implementation Strategies? Predicting Use of Youth CBT with Clinician Self-Report Versus Direct Observation. Factors Influencing the Engagement with Electronic Mental Health Technologies: A Systematic Review of Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1