aCML 和 CNL 不同的临床特征和患者预后。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Annals of Hematology Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1007/s00277-024-06032-z
Yingxin Sun, Qinrong Wang, Zhiyu Zhang, Qian Wang, Jiannong Cen, Mingqing Zhu, Jinlan Pan, Dandan Liu, Hongjie Shen, Yifeng Cai, Suning Chen
{"title":"aCML 和 CNL 不同的临床特征和患者预后。","authors":"Yingxin Sun, Qinrong Wang, Zhiyu Zhang, Qian Wang, Jiannong Cen, Mingqing Zhu, Jinlan Pan, Dandan Liu, Hongjie Shen, Yifeng Cai, Suning Chen","doi":"10.1007/s00277-024-06032-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The classification of atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) and chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) as a single disease entity remains a topic of debate. To elucidate the characteristics of both entities, this retrospective cohort study was conducted, encompassing 36 cases of aCML and 18 cases of CNL. We discovered that aCML and CNL presented distinct blood counts, genetics, molecular profiles and outcomes. Specifically, hemoglobin levels (P < 0.001) and platelet counts (P < 0.001) were significantly lower in aCML cases than in CNL cases, with no significant difference in mean white blood cells (P = 0.637). The proportion of abnormal karyotypes was higher in aCML cases compared with CNL cases (P = 0.010). Notably, we found that aCML and CNL showed distinct gene expression profiles by transcriptome sequencing technology. The median follow-up duration for the entire cohort was 8 months (rang 0.4 to 36.6 months), and the median overall survival (OS) was significantly shorter in aCML cases (7.3 months, 95%CI 5.4 to 20.5 months) than in CNL cases (median OS not reached). The one-year OS rate for aCML patients was 31.0% (9/29), compared to 92.9% (13/14) for CNL patients. In conclusion, our study supports the notion that aCML and CNL are indeed distinct disease entities characterized by unique hematological features and clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8068,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distinct clinical profiles and patient outcomes in aCML and CNL.\",\"authors\":\"Yingxin Sun, Qinrong Wang, Zhiyu Zhang, Qian Wang, Jiannong Cen, Mingqing Zhu, Jinlan Pan, Dandan Liu, Hongjie Shen, Yifeng Cai, Suning Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00277-024-06032-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The classification of atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) and chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) as a single disease entity remains a topic of debate. To elucidate the characteristics of both entities, this retrospective cohort study was conducted, encompassing 36 cases of aCML and 18 cases of CNL. We discovered that aCML and CNL presented distinct blood counts, genetics, molecular profiles and outcomes. Specifically, hemoglobin levels (P < 0.001) and platelet counts (P < 0.001) were significantly lower in aCML cases than in CNL cases, with no significant difference in mean white blood cells (P = 0.637). The proportion of abnormal karyotypes was higher in aCML cases compared with CNL cases (P = 0.010). Notably, we found that aCML and CNL showed distinct gene expression profiles by transcriptome sequencing technology. The median follow-up duration for the entire cohort was 8 months (rang 0.4 to 36.6 months), and the median overall survival (OS) was significantly shorter in aCML cases (7.3 months, 95%CI 5.4 to 20.5 months) than in CNL cases (median OS not reached). The one-year OS rate for aCML patients was 31.0% (9/29), compared to 92.9% (13/14) for CNL patients. In conclusion, our study supports the notion that aCML and CNL are indeed distinct disease entities characterized by unique hematological features and clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Hematology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-024-06032-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-024-06032-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将非典型慢性髓性白血病(aCML)和慢性中性粒细胞白血病(CNL)归类为单一疾病实体仍是一个争论不休的话题。为了阐明这两种疾病的特征,我们开展了这项回顾性队列研究,其中包括 36 例 aCML 和 18 例 CNL。我们发现,aCML 和 CNL 在血细胞计数、遗传学、分子特征和预后方面各不相同。具体来说,血红蛋白水平(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Distinct clinical profiles and patient outcomes in aCML and CNL.

The classification of atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) and chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) as a single disease entity remains a topic of debate. To elucidate the characteristics of both entities, this retrospective cohort study was conducted, encompassing 36 cases of aCML and 18 cases of CNL. We discovered that aCML and CNL presented distinct blood counts, genetics, molecular profiles and outcomes. Specifically, hemoglobin levels (P < 0.001) and platelet counts (P < 0.001) were significantly lower in aCML cases than in CNL cases, with no significant difference in mean white blood cells (P = 0.637). The proportion of abnormal karyotypes was higher in aCML cases compared with CNL cases (P = 0.010). Notably, we found that aCML and CNL showed distinct gene expression profiles by transcriptome sequencing technology. The median follow-up duration for the entire cohort was 8 months (rang 0.4 to 36.6 months), and the median overall survival (OS) was significantly shorter in aCML cases (7.3 months, 95%CI 5.4 to 20.5 months) than in CNL cases (median OS not reached). The one-year OS rate for aCML patients was 31.0% (9/29), compared to 92.9% (13/14) for CNL patients. In conclusion, our study supports the notion that aCML and CNL are indeed distinct disease entities characterized by unique hematological features and clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Hematology
Annals of Hematology 医学-血液学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
304
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Hematology covers the whole spectrum of clinical and experimental hematology, hemostaseology, blood transfusion, and related aspects of medical oncology, including diagnosis and treatment of leukemias, lymphatic neoplasias and solid tumors, and transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells. Coverage includes general aspects of oncology, molecular biology and immunology as pertinent to problems of human blood disease. The journal is associated with the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology, and the Austrian Society for Hematology and Oncology.
期刊最新文献
Construction of AML prognostic model with CYP2E1 and GALNT12 biomarkers based on golgi- associated genes. Association of albumin to urea nitrogen ratio with 30-day mortality in adult hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: a retrospective cohort study. Chidamide and venetoclax synergistically regulate the Wnt/β-catenin pathway by MYCN/DKK3 in B-ALL. Novel serous effusion-related risk models and biomarkers for predicting prognosis in T-cell lymphoma patients. Immunosuppressive microenvironment in acute myeloid leukemia: overview, therapeutic targets and corresponding strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1