Comparative assessment of attitudes and expectations: Iranian patients versus urologists in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Background: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is common and presents as lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Understanding patient concerns and treatment preferences is essential for effective management. This study aimed to investigate the attitudes, preferences, and expectations of Iranian patients with BPH, and compare them with those of urologists in addressing this condition.

Methods: A cohort of patients diagnosed with BPH underwent assessment during their initial visit. Before any counseling, their attitudes, concerns, and expectations regarding benign prostate enlargement were evaluated using semi-structured interviews. Patient responses were analyzed based on educational levels and age. Additionally, correspondence was initiated with thirty urologists who graduated within the past twelve years to assess their attitudes toward BPH, concerns, and treatment approaches. Interview questions were constructed using the Delphi method, and their validity was confirmed. Responses from both groups were analyzed and compared. Descriptive statistics, independent t-test, Chi-squared test, Mann-Whitney U, and principal component analysis (PCA) with varimax rotation were used for statistical analysis.

Results: The study comprised 261 patients and 30 urologists. Findings revealed that 86.2% of patients and 86.7% of urologists perceived a lack of sufficient patient knowledge about BPH. Patients across all educational levels and age groups expressed a desire for more information about their condition. Primary concerns among patients included exacerbation of urinary symptoms, potential malignancy, and sexual dysfunction. While patients generally preferred pharmacological treatments, those older than 75 years showed a significantly higher preference for surgical options. Conversely, urologists exhibited greater concern for long-term clinical complications associated with BPH. Results indicated significant parallels between the attitudes of urologists and patients in assessing the multifaceted impact of BPH on patient well-being.

Conclusion: This study enhances our understanding of patient attitudes and concerns regarding BPH, thereby facilitating more effective treatment strategies. Our findings encourage urologists to enhance patient perspectives by delivering comprehensive information. Furthermore, the comparison between patient and urologist attitudes towards BPH underscores the importance of tailored care and patient-centered approaches in optimizing outcomes for individuals with BPH.