内窥镜超声波和 CT 扫描在食管重复囊肿诊断中的比较。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Digestive Diseases and Sciences Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1007/s10620-024-08655-8
Eve Ronkainen, Nina Barner-Rasmussen, Kirsi Volmonen, Martti Färkkilä, Perttu Arkkila, Andrea Tenca
{"title":"内窥镜超声波和 CT 扫描在食管重复囊肿诊断中的比较。","authors":"Eve Ronkainen, Nina Barner-Rasmussen, Kirsi Volmonen, Martti Färkkilä, Perttu Arkkila, Andrea Tenca","doi":"10.1007/s10620-024-08655-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Esophageal duplication cysts (EDCs) are rare congenital malformations, often discovered incidentally during endoscopy or on computed tomography (CT) scans. The role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and CT scan in the diagnosis of these lesions and indications for surgical treatment are underreported. The aim of this study was to investigate these topics in a cohort of patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between January 2001 and October 2020, 82 patients had a suspicion of esophageal duplication cyst on endoscopic ultrasound. Thirty four of these patients were referred for surgical enucleation of the lesion, but three patients were lost to follow-up. At the end, 31 patients, who underwent surgical treatment for their suspected EDC were included in this study. Clinical features, EUS findings, CT images, surgical treatment, and outcome were collected from hospital health records. CT images were re-evaluated by a chest radiologist. Type of surgery, surgical complications, and final histological diagnosis were reported.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusion: </strong>The patients referred for surgery were younger (p = 0.0001) and had larger lesions (> 2 cm; p = 0.005) than the patients who had non-operative follow-up. From thirty-one operated patients, eighteen (58%) had post-operative histological diagnosis of duplication cyst. On EUS the final histological diagnosis was correct in 58% (18/31) of all the operated cases and on CT scan 57% (17/30). CT scan misdiagnosed three of the EDCs but found two leiomyomas correctly. None of these patients developed malignancy. According to this study, neither EUS without fine-needle biopsy nor CT scan alone can differentiate EDCs from other mediastinal masses.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound and CT Scan in the Diagnosis of Esophageal Duplication Cysts.\",\"authors\":\"Eve Ronkainen, Nina Barner-Rasmussen, Kirsi Volmonen, Martti Färkkilä, Perttu Arkkila, Andrea Tenca\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10620-024-08655-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Esophageal duplication cysts (EDCs) are rare congenital malformations, often discovered incidentally during endoscopy or on computed tomography (CT) scans. The role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and CT scan in the diagnosis of these lesions and indications for surgical treatment are underreported. The aim of this study was to investigate these topics in a cohort of patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between January 2001 and October 2020, 82 patients had a suspicion of esophageal duplication cyst on endoscopic ultrasound. Thirty four of these patients were referred for surgical enucleation of the lesion, but three patients were lost to follow-up. At the end, 31 patients, who underwent surgical treatment for their suspected EDC were included in this study. Clinical features, EUS findings, CT images, surgical treatment, and outcome were collected from hospital health records. CT images were re-evaluated by a chest radiologist. Type of surgery, surgical complications, and final histological diagnosis were reported.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusion: </strong>The patients referred for surgery were younger (p = 0.0001) and had larger lesions (> 2 cm; p = 0.005) than the patients who had non-operative follow-up. From thirty-one operated patients, eighteen (58%) had post-operative histological diagnosis of duplication cyst. On EUS the final histological diagnosis was correct in 58% (18/31) of all the operated cases and on CT scan 57% (17/30). CT scan misdiagnosed three of the EDCs but found two leiomyomas correctly. None of these patients developed malignancy. According to this study, neither EUS without fine-needle biopsy nor CT scan alone can differentiate EDCs from other mediastinal masses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08655-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08655-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:食管重复囊肿(EDC)是一种罕见的先天性畸形,通常是在内镜检查或计算机断层扫描(CT)中偶然发现的。内镜超声(EUS)和 CT 扫描在诊断这些病变中的作用以及手术治疗的适应症尚未得到充分报道。本研究的目的是在一组患者中调查这些问题:2001 年 1 月至 2020 年 10 月间,82 名患者经内镜超声检查怀疑患有食管重复囊肿。其中 34 名患者被转诊接受了病灶的手术切除,但有 3 名患者失去了随访机会。最终,31 名疑似食管重复囊肿患者接受了手术治疗。研究人员从医院健康记录中收集了患者的临床特征、EUS检查结果、CT图像、手术治疗和结果。CT 图像由胸部放射科医生重新评估。报告了手术类型、手术并发症和最终组织学诊断:与接受非手术随访的患者相比,接受手术的患者更年轻(P = 0.0001),病灶更大(> 2 厘米;P = 0.005)。在 31 名手术患者中,18 人(58%)术后组织学诊断为重复囊肿。在所有手术病例中,58%(18/31)的 EUS 最终组织学诊断是正确的,57%(17/30)的 CT 扫描最终组织学诊断是正确的。CT 扫描误诊了 3 例 EDC,但正确发现了 2 例子宫肌瘤。这些患者均未发展为恶性肿瘤。根据这项研究,不进行细针活检的 EUS 和单纯 CT 扫描都不能将 EDC 与其他纵隔肿块区分开来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound and CT Scan in the Diagnosis of Esophageal Duplication Cysts.

Background and aim: Esophageal duplication cysts (EDCs) are rare congenital malformations, often discovered incidentally during endoscopy or on computed tomography (CT) scans. The role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and CT scan in the diagnosis of these lesions and indications for surgical treatment are underreported. The aim of this study was to investigate these topics in a cohort of patients.

Materials and methods: Between January 2001 and October 2020, 82 patients had a suspicion of esophageal duplication cyst on endoscopic ultrasound. Thirty four of these patients were referred for surgical enucleation of the lesion, but three patients were lost to follow-up. At the end, 31 patients, who underwent surgical treatment for their suspected EDC were included in this study. Clinical features, EUS findings, CT images, surgical treatment, and outcome were collected from hospital health records. CT images were re-evaluated by a chest radiologist. Type of surgery, surgical complications, and final histological diagnosis were reported.

Results and conclusion: The patients referred for surgery were younger (p = 0.0001) and had larger lesions (> 2 cm; p = 0.005) than the patients who had non-operative follow-up. From thirty-one operated patients, eighteen (58%) had post-operative histological diagnosis of duplication cyst. On EUS the final histological diagnosis was correct in 58% (18/31) of all the operated cases and on CT scan 57% (17/30). CT scan misdiagnosed three of the EDCs but found two leiomyomas correctly. None of these patients developed malignancy. According to this study, neither EUS without fine-needle biopsy nor CT scan alone can differentiate EDCs from other mediastinal masses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
期刊最新文献
Country Comfort? Risk Factors for Unplanned Healthcare Visits in Rural America in Children with IBD. Preventive Measures and Risk Factors for Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. A Case of Imaging-Negative Distal Cholangiocarcinoma Diagnosed by Novel Spyglass Transoral Cholangioscope. Association of Heterotopic Gastric Mucosa in the Upper Esophagus (HGMUE) with Pharyngolaryngeal Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Inflammatory Bowel Disease Knowledge and Education Among Healthcare Professional Groups.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1