确定儿童癫痫生活质量问卷的最小临床意义差异。

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epilepsia Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1111/epi.18140
Mariela Leda, Klajdi Puka, Karen Bax, Joel J Gagnier, Karina Tassiopoulos, Kathy Nixon Speechley
{"title":"确定儿童癫痫生活质量问卷的最小临床意义差异。","authors":"Mariela Leda, Klajdi Puka, Karen Bax, Joel J Gagnier, Karina Tassiopoulos, Kathy Nixon Speechley","doi":"10.1111/epi.18140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the parent-reported 55-item Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy Questionnaire (QOLCE-55) and its shortened 16-item version, QOLCE-16.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data came from 74 children with epilepsy (CWE) (ages 4-10, mean age = 8 [SD = 1.8]) enrolled in the Making Mindfulness Matter in Epilepsy (M3-E) trial, a pilot, parallel randomized-controlled trial of a mindfulness-based intervention. Both anchor-based and distribution-based methods were used to estimate MCID values for the QOLCE-55 and QOLCE-16. For the anchor-based approach, the Patient Centered Global Ratings of Change (PCGRC) scale and linear regression analysis were used to estimate the MCID. For the distribution-based approach, .5 SD of the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) change score distribution was used to estimate the MCID.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the QOLCE-55, the MCID obtained using an anchor-based approach was 10 points and using a distribution-based method was 6 points. For the QOLCE-16, the MCID obtained using an anchor-based method was 13 points and using a distribution-based method was 7 points.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>This is the first study to estimate MCID values for the QOLCE-55 and the QOLCE-16. It has been well documented that CWE are at risk of experiencing psychological, behavioral, and cognitive impairments, which can negatively impact their HRQOL. Reporting MCID values for the QOLCE-55 and QOLCE-16 is important in determining whether changes in HRQOL observed are meaningful to CWE themselves, as a key factor in shaping the nature of epilepsy care delivered.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing the minimum clinically important difference of the Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy Questionnaire.\",\"authors\":\"Mariela Leda, Klajdi Puka, Karen Bax, Joel J Gagnier, Karina Tassiopoulos, Kathy Nixon Speechley\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/epi.18140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the parent-reported 55-item Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy Questionnaire (QOLCE-55) and its shortened 16-item version, QOLCE-16.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data came from 74 children with epilepsy (CWE) (ages 4-10, mean age = 8 [SD = 1.8]) enrolled in the Making Mindfulness Matter in Epilepsy (M3-E) trial, a pilot, parallel randomized-controlled trial of a mindfulness-based intervention. Both anchor-based and distribution-based methods were used to estimate MCID values for the QOLCE-55 and QOLCE-16. For the anchor-based approach, the Patient Centered Global Ratings of Change (PCGRC) scale and linear regression analysis were used to estimate the MCID. For the distribution-based approach, .5 SD of the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) change score distribution was used to estimate the MCID.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the QOLCE-55, the MCID obtained using an anchor-based approach was 10 points and using a distribution-based method was 6 points. For the QOLCE-16, the MCID obtained using an anchor-based method was 13 points and using a distribution-based method was 7 points.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>This is the first study to estimate MCID values for the QOLCE-55 and the QOLCE-16. It has been well documented that CWE are at risk of experiencing psychological, behavioral, and cognitive impairments, which can negatively impact their HRQOL. Reporting MCID values for the QOLCE-55 and QOLCE-16 is important in determining whether changes in HRQOL observed are meaningful to CWE themselves, as a key factor in shaping the nature of epilepsy care delivered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18140\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18140","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的估算家长报告的 55 项儿童癫痫生活质量问卷(QOLCE-55)及其 16 项缩短版 QOLCE-16 的最小临床重要性差异(MCID):数据来自 74 名癫痫患儿(CWE)(4-10 岁,平均年龄 = 8 [SD = 1.8]),他们参加了 "让正念在癫痫中发挥作用"(M3-E)试验,这是一项基于正念的干预措施的试点、平行随机对照试验。在估算 QOLCE-55 和 QOLCE-16 的 MCID 值时,使用了基于锚的方法和基于分布的方法。在基于锚的方法中,使用了以患者为中心的全球变化评分量表 (PCGRC) 和线性回归分析来估算 MCID。对于基于分布的方法,使用健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)变化得分分布的 0.5 SD 来估计 MCID:结果:对于 QOLCE-55,使用基于锚的方法得出的 MCID 为 10 分,使用基于分布的方法得出的 MCID 为 6 分。对于 QOLCE-16,使用基于锚的方法得出的 MCID 为 13 分,使用基于分布的方法得出的 MCID 为 7 分:这是第一项估算 QOLCE-55 和 QOLCE-16 MCID 值的研究。有大量文件表明,化武受害者有可能出现心理、行为和认知障碍,这可能会对他们的 HRQOL 产生负面影响。报告 QOLCE-55 和 QOLCE-16 的 MCID 值对于确定观察到的 HRQOL 变化对 CWE 自身是否有意义非常重要,因为这是决定所提供的癫痫护理性质的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Establishing the minimum clinically important difference of the Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy Questionnaire.

Objective: To estimate the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the parent-reported 55-item Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy Questionnaire (QOLCE-55) and its shortened 16-item version, QOLCE-16.

Methods: Data came from 74 children with epilepsy (CWE) (ages 4-10, mean age = 8 [SD = 1.8]) enrolled in the Making Mindfulness Matter in Epilepsy (M3-E) trial, a pilot, parallel randomized-controlled trial of a mindfulness-based intervention. Both anchor-based and distribution-based methods were used to estimate MCID values for the QOLCE-55 and QOLCE-16. For the anchor-based approach, the Patient Centered Global Ratings of Change (PCGRC) scale and linear regression analysis were used to estimate the MCID. For the distribution-based approach, .5 SD of the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) change score distribution was used to estimate the MCID.

Results: For the QOLCE-55, the MCID obtained using an anchor-based approach was 10 points and using a distribution-based method was 6 points. For the QOLCE-16, the MCID obtained using an anchor-based method was 13 points and using a distribution-based method was 7 points.

Significance: This is the first study to estimate MCID values for the QOLCE-55 and the QOLCE-16. It has been well documented that CWE are at risk of experiencing psychological, behavioral, and cognitive impairments, which can negatively impact their HRQOL. Reporting MCID values for the QOLCE-55 and QOLCE-16 is important in determining whether changes in HRQOL observed are meaningful to CWE themselves, as a key factor in shaping the nature of epilepsy care delivered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
期刊最新文献
Structural connectivity changes in focal epilepsy: Beyond the epileptogenic zone. Efficacy and safety of perampanel in patients with seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: A randomized trial. Focal negative motor seizures: Multimodal evaluation. Automatic responsiveness testing in epilepsy with wearable technology: The ARTiE Watch. WONOEP appraisal: Targeted therapy development for early onset epilepsies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1