Ovidio De Filippo, Raffaele Mineo, Michele Millesimo, Wojciech Wańha, Federica Proietto Salanitri, Antonio Greco, Antonio Maria Leone, Luca Franchin, Simone Palazzo, Giorgio Quadri, Domenico Tuttolomondo, Enrico Fabris, Gianluca Campo, Alessandra Truffa Giachet, Francesco Bruno, Mario Iannaccone, Giacomo Boccuzzi, Nicola Gaibazzi, Ferdinando Varbella, Wojciech Wojakowski, Michele Maremmani, Guglielmo Gallone, Gianfranco Sinagra, Davide Capodanno, Giuseppe Musumeci, Paolo Boretto, Pawel Pawlus, Andrea Saglietto, Francesco Burzotta, Marco Aldinucci, Daniela Giordano, Gaetano Maria De Ferrari, Concetto Spampinato, Fabrizio D'Ascenzo
{"title":"通过人工智能从普通血管造影对冠状动脉中段狭窄进行无创生理评估:STARFLOW 系统。","authors":"Ovidio De Filippo, Raffaele Mineo, Michele Millesimo, Wojciech Wańha, Federica Proietto Salanitri, Antonio Greco, Antonio Maria Leone, Luca Franchin, Simone Palazzo, Giorgio Quadri, Domenico Tuttolomondo, Enrico Fabris, Gianluca Campo, Alessandra Truffa Giachet, Francesco Bruno, Mario Iannaccone, Giacomo Boccuzzi, Nicola Gaibazzi, Ferdinando Varbella, Wojciech Wojakowski, Michele Maremmani, Guglielmo Gallone, Gianfranco Sinagra, Davide Capodanno, Giuseppe Musumeci, Paolo Boretto, Pawel Pawlus, Andrea Saglietto, Francesco Burzotta, Marco Aldinucci, Daniela Giordano, Gaetano Maria De Ferrari, Concetto Spampinato, Fabrizio D'Ascenzo","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite evidence supporting use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous waves-free ratio (iFR) to improve outcome of patients undergoing coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary intervention, such techniques are still underused in clinical practice due to economic and logistic issues.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based application to compute FFR and iFR from plain CA.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Consecutive patients performing FFR or iFR or both were enrolled. A specific multi-task deep network exploiting 2 projections of the coronary of interest from standard CA was appraised. Accuracy of prediction of FFR/iFR of the AI model was the primary endpoint, along with sensitivity and specificity. Prediction was tested both for continuous values and for dichotomous classification (positive/negative) for FFR or iFR. Subgroup analyses were performed for FFR and iFR.A total of 389 patients from 5 centers were enrolled. Mean age was 67.9 ± 9.6 and 39.2% of patients were admitted for acute coronary syndrome. Overall, the accuracy was 87.3% (81.2-93.4%), with a sensitivity of 82.4% (71.9-96.4%) and a specificity of 92.2% (90.4-93.9%). For FFR, accuracy was 84.8% (77.8-91.8%), with a sensitivity of 81.9% (69.4-94.4%) and a specificity of 87.7% (85.5-89.9%), while for iFR accuracy was 90.2% (86.0-94.6%), with a sensitivity of 87.2% (76.6-97.8%) and a specificity of 93.2% (91.7-94.7%, all confidence intervals 95%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presented machine-learning based tool showed high accuracy in prediction of wire-based FFR and iFR.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-invasive physiological assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses from plain angiography through artificial intelligence: the STARFLOW system.\",\"authors\":\"Ovidio De Filippo, Raffaele Mineo, Michele Millesimo, Wojciech Wańha, Federica Proietto Salanitri, Antonio Greco, Antonio Maria Leone, Luca Franchin, Simone Palazzo, Giorgio Quadri, Domenico Tuttolomondo, Enrico Fabris, Gianluca Campo, Alessandra Truffa Giachet, Francesco Bruno, Mario Iannaccone, Giacomo Boccuzzi, Nicola Gaibazzi, Ferdinando Varbella, Wojciech Wojakowski, Michele Maremmani, Guglielmo Gallone, Gianfranco Sinagra, Davide Capodanno, Giuseppe Musumeci, Paolo Boretto, Pawel Pawlus, Andrea Saglietto, Francesco Burzotta, Marco Aldinucci, Daniela Giordano, Gaetano Maria De Ferrari, Concetto Spampinato, Fabrizio D'Ascenzo\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite evidence supporting use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous waves-free ratio (iFR) to improve outcome of patients undergoing coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary intervention, such techniques are still underused in clinical practice due to economic and logistic issues.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based application to compute FFR and iFR from plain CA.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Consecutive patients performing FFR or iFR or both were enrolled. A specific multi-task deep network exploiting 2 projections of the coronary of interest from standard CA was appraised. Accuracy of prediction of FFR/iFR of the AI model was the primary endpoint, along with sensitivity and specificity. Prediction was tested both for continuous values and for dichotomous classification (positive/negative) for FFR or iFR. Subgroup analyses were performed for FFR and iFR.A total of 389 patients from 5 centers were enrolled. Mean age was 67.9 ± 9.6 and 39.2% of patients were admitted for acute coronary syndrome. Overall, the accuracy was 87.3% (81.2-93.4%), with a sensitivity of 82.4% (71.9-96.4%) and a specificity of 92.2% (90.4-93.9%). For FFR, accuracy was 84.8% (77.8-91.8%), with a sensitivity of 81.9% (69.4-94.4%) and a specificity of 87.7% (85.5-89.9%), while for iFR accuracy was 90.2% (86.0-94.6%), with a sensitivity of 87.2% (76.6-97.8%) and a specificity of 93.2% (91.7-94.7%, all confidence intervals 95%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presented machine-learning based tool showed high accuracy in prediction of wire-based FFR and iFR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae024\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Non-invasive physiological assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses from plain angiography through artificial intelligence: the STARFLOW system.
Background: Despite evidence supporting use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous waves-free ratio (iFR) to improve outcome of patients undergoing coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary intervention, such techniques are still underused in clinical practice due to economic and logistic issues.
Objectives: We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based application to compute FFR and iFR from plain CA.
Methods and results: Consecutive patients performing FFR or iFR or both were enrolled. A specific multi-task deep network exploiting 2 projections of the coronary of interest from standard CA was appraised. Accuracy of prediction of FFR/iFR of the AI model was the primary endpoint, along with sensitivity and specificity. Prediction was tested both for continuous values and for dichotomous classification (positive/negative) for FFR or iFR. Subgroup analyses were performed for FFR and iFR.A total of 389 patients from 5 centers were enrolled. Mean age was 67.9 ± 9.6 and 39.2% of patients were admitted for acute coronary syndrome. Overall, the accuracy was 87.3% (81.2-93.4%), with a sensitivity of 82.4% (71.9-96.4%) and a specificity of 92.2% (90.4-93.9%). For FFR, accuracy was 84.8% (77.8-91.8%), with a sensitivity of 81.9% (69.4-94.4%) and a specificity of 87.7% (85.5-89.9%), while for iFR accuracy was 90.2% (86.0-94.6%), with a sensitivity of 87.2% (76.6-97.8%) and a specificity of 93.2% (91.7-94.7%, all confidence intervals 95%).
Conclusion: The presented machine-learning based tool showed high accuracy in prediction of wire-based FFR and iFR.
期刊介绍:
European Heart Journal - Quality of Care & Clinical Outcomes is an English language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing cardiovascular outcomes research. It serves as an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology and maintains a close alliance with the European Heart Health Institute. The journal disseminates original research and topical reviews contributed by health scientists globally, with a focus on the quality of care and its impact on cardiovascular outcomes at the hospital, national, and international levels. It provides a platform for presenting the most outstanding cardiovascular outcomes research to influence cardiovascular public health policy on a global scale. Additionally, the journal aims to motivate young investigators and foster the growth of the outcomes research community.