Asad Bhatty, Chris Wilkinson, Gorav Batra, Suleman Aktaa, Adam B Smith, Ali Wahab, Sam Chappell, Joakim Alfredsson, David Erlinge, Jorge Ferreira, Ingibjörg J Guðmundsdóttir, Þórdís Jóna Hrafnkelsdóttir, Inga Jóna Ingimarsdóttir, Alar Irs, András Jánosi, Zoltán Járai, Manuel Oliveira-Santos, Bogdan A Popescu, Peter Vasko, Dragos Vinereanu, Jonathan Yap, Raffaele Bugiardini, Edina Cenko, Ramesh Nadarajah, Matthew R Sydes, Stefan James, Aldo P Maggioni, Lars Wallentin, Barbara Casadei, Chris P Gale
{"title":"标准化和分级分类的心力衰竭和辅助疾病监测结果测量方法：欧洲心脏护理评估和随机试验统一登记处（EuroHeart）。","authors":"Asad Bhatty, Chris Wilkinson, Gorav Batra, Suleman Aktaa, Adam B Smith, Ali Wahab, Sam Chappell, Joakim Alfredsson, David Erlinge, Jorge Ferreira, Ingibjörg J Guðmundsdóttir, Þórdís Jóna Hrafnkelsdóttir, Inga Jóna Ingimarsdóttir, Alar Irs, András Jánosi, Zoltán Járai, Manuel Oliveira-Santos, Bogdan A Popescu, Peter Vasko, Dragos Vinereanu, Jonathan Yap, Raffaele Bugiardini, Edina Cenko, Ramesh Nadarajah, Matthew R Sydes, Stefan James, Aldo P Maggioni, Lars Wallentin, Barbara Casadei, Chris P Gale","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The lack of standardised definitions for heart failure outcome measures limits the ability to reliably assess effectiveness of heart failure therapies. The European Unified Registries for Heart Care Evaluation and Randomised Trials (EuroHeart) aimed to produce a catalogue of internationally endorsed data definitions for heart failure outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the EuroHeart methods for the development of cardiovascular data standards, a working group was formed of representatives from the European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Association and other leading heart failure experts. A systematic review of observational and randomised clinical trials identified current outcome measures, which was supplemented by clinical practice guidelines and existing registries for contemporary definitions. A modified Delphi process was employed to gain consensus for variable inclusion and whether collection should be mandatory (Level 1) or optional (Level 2) within EuroHeart. In addition, a set of complementary outcome measures were identified by the Working Group as of scientific and clinical importance for longitudinal monitoring for people with heart failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five Level 1 and two Level 2 outcome measures were selected and defined, alongside five complementary monitoring outcomes for patients with heart failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We present a structured, hierarchical catalogue of internationally endorsed heart failure outcome measures. This will facilitate quality improvement, high quality observational research, registry-based trials, and post market surveillance of medical devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standardised and hierarchically classified heart failure and complementary disease monitoring outcome measures: european Unified Registries for heart Care evaluation and randomised trials (EuroHeart).\",\"authors\":\"Asad Bhatty, Chris Wilkinson, Gorav Batra, Suleman Aktaa, Adam B Smith, Ali Wahab, Sam Chappell, Joakim Alfredsson, David Erlinge, Jorge Ferreira, Ingibjörg J Guðmundsdóttir, Þórdís Jóna Hrafnkelsdóttir, Inga Jóna Ingimarsdóttir, Alar Irs, András Jánosi, Zoltán Járai, Manuel Oliveira-Santos, Bogdan A Popescu, Peter Vasko, Dragos Vinereanu, Jonathan Yap, Raffaele Bugiardini, Edina Cenko, Ramesh Nadarajah, Matthew R Sydes, Stefan James, Aldo P Maggioni, Lars Wallentin, Barbara Casadei, Chris P Gale\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The lack of standardised definitions for heart failure outcome measures limits the ability to reliably assess effectiveness of heart failure therapies. The European Unified Registries for Heart Care Evaluation and Randomised Trials (EuroHeart) aimed to produce a catalogue of internationally endorsed data definitions for heart failure outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the EuroHeart methods for the development of cardiovascular data standards, a working group was formed of representatives from the European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Association and other leading heart failure experts. A systematic review of observational and randomised clinical trials identified current outcome measures, which was supplemented by clinical practice guidelines and existing registries for contemporary definitions. A modified Delphi process was employed to gain consensus for variable inclusion and whether collection should be mandatory (Level 1) or optional (Level 2) within EuroHeart. In addition, a set of complementary outcome measures were identified by the Working Group as of scientific and clinical importance for longitudinal monitoring for people with heart failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five Level 1 and two Level 2 outcome measures were selected and defined, alongside five complementary monitoring outcomes for patients with heart failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We present a structured, hierarchical catalogue of internationally endorsed heart failure outcome measures. This will facilitate quality improvement, high quality observational research, registry-based trials, and post market surveillance of medical devices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae086\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae086","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Standardised and hierarchically classified heart failure and complementary disease monitoring outcome measures: european Unified Registries for heart Care evaluation and randomised trials (EuroHeart).
Aims: The lack of standardised definitions for heart failure outcome measures limits the ability to reliably assess effectiveness of heart failure therapies. The European Unified Registries for Heart Care Evaluation and Randomised Trials (EuroHeart) aimed to produce a catalogue of internationally endorsed data definitions for heart failure outcome measures.
Methods: Following the EuroHeart methods for the development of cardiovascular data standards, a working group was formed of representatives from the European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Association and other leading heart failure experts. A systematic review of observational and randomised clinical trials identified current outcome measures, which was supplemented by clinical practice guidelines and existing registries for contemporary definitions. A modified Delphi process was employed to gain consensus for variable inclusion and whether collection should be mandatory (Level 1) or optional (Level 2) within EuroHeart. In addition, a set of complementary outcome measures were identified by the Working Group as of scientific and clinical importance for longitudinal monitoring for people with heart failure.
Results: Five Level 1 and two Level 2 outcome measures were selected and defined, alongside five complementary monitoring outcomes for patients with heart failure.
Conclusion: We present a structured, hierarchical catalogue of internationally endorsed heart failure outcome measures. This will facilitate quality improvement, high quality observational research, registry-based trials, and post market surveillance of medical devices.
期刊介绍：
European Heart Journal - Quality of Care & Clinical Outcomes is an English language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing cardiovascular outcomes research. It serves as an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology and maintains a close alliance with the European Heart Health Institute. The journal disseminates original research and topical reviews contributed by health scientists globally, with a focus on the quality of care and its impact on cardiovascular outcomes at the hospital, national, and international levels. It provides a platform for presenting the most outstanding cardiovascular outcomes research to influence cardiovascular public health policy on a global scale. Additionally, the journal aims to motivate young investigators and foster the growth of the outcomes research community.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
