Joel S Burma, Matthew G Neill, Elizabeth K S Fletcher, Brooke E Dennett, Nathan E Johnson, Raelyn Javra, James K Griffiths, Jonathan D Smirl
{"title":"研究动态大脑自动调节的频率上限:优卡普尼亚期间整个心动周期的考虑因素。","authors":"Joel S Burma, Matthew G Neill, Elizabeth K S Fletcher, Brooke E Dennett, Nathan E Johnson, Raelyn Javra, James K Griffiths, Jonathan D Smirl","doi":"10.1113/EP091719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are differences within the literature regarding the upper frequency cut-off point of the dynamic cerebral autoregulation (CA) high-pass filter. The projection pursuit regression approach has demonstrated that the upper frequency limit is ∼0.07 Hz, whereas another approach [transfer function analysis (TFA) phase approaching zero] indicated a theoretical upper frequency limit for the high-pass filter of 0.24 Hz. We investigated how these limits accurately represent the CA upper frequency limit, in addition to extending earlier findings with respect to biological sexes and across the cardiac cycle. Sixteen participants (nine females and seven males) performed repeated squat-stand manoeuvres at frequencies of 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20 and 0.25 Hz, with insonation of the middle and posterior cerebral arteries. Linear regression modelling with adjustment for sex and order of squat completion was used to compared TFA gain and phase with 0.25 Hz (above the theoretical limit of CA). The upper frequency limit of CA with TFA gain was within the range of 0.05-0.10 Hz, whereas TFA phase was within the range of 0.20-0.25 Hz, and consistent between vessels, between sexes and across the cardiac cycle. Females displayed greater middle cerebral artery gain compared with males (all P < 0.047), and no phase differences were present (all P > 0.072). Although sex-specific differences were present for specific TFA metrics at a given frequency, the upper frequency limit of autoregulation was similar between cerebral conduit vessels, cardiac cycle phase and biological sex. Future work is warranted to determine whether an upper frequency limit exists with respect to hysteresis analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":12092,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the upper frequency limit of dynamic cerebral autoregulation: Considerations across the cardiac cycle during eucapnia.\",\"authors\":\"Joel S Burma, Matthew G Neill, Elizabeth K S Fletcher, Brooke E Dennett, Nathan E Johnson, Raelyn Javra, James K Griffiths, Jonathan D Smirl\",\"doi\":\"10.1113/EP091719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There are differences within the literature regarding the upper frequency cut-off point of the dynamic cerebral autoregulation (CA) high-pass filter. The projection pursuit regression approach has demonstrated that the upper frequency limit is ∼0.07 Hz, whereas another approach [transfer function analysis (TFA) phase approaching zero] indicated a theoretical upper frequency limit for the high-pass filter of 0.24 Hz. We investigated how these limits accurately represent the CA upper frequency limit, in addition to extending earlier findings with respect to biological sexes and across the cardiac cycle. Sixteen participants (nine females and seven males) performed repeated squat-stand manoeuvres at frequencies of 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20 and 0.25 Hz, with insonation of the middle and posterior cerebral arteries. Linear regression modelling with adjustment for sex and order of squat completion was used to compared TFA gain and phase with 0.25 Hz (above the theoretical limit of CA). The upper frequency limit of CA with TFA gain was within the range of 0.05-0.10 Hz, whereas TFA phase was within the range of 0.20-0.25 Hz, and consistent between vessels, between sexes and across the cardiac cycle. Females displayed greater middle cerebral artery gain compared with males (all P < 0.047), and no phase differences were present (all P > 0.072). Although sex-specific differences were present for specific TFA metrics at a given frequency, the upper frequency limit of autoregulation was similar between cerebral conduit vessels, cardiac cycle phase and biological sex. Future work is warranted to determine whether an upper frequency limit exists with respect to hysteresis analyses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1113/EP091719\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/EP091719","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
关于动态脑自动调节(CA)高通滤波器的频率上限截止点,文献中存在分歧。投影追迹回归法证明频率上限为 0.07 赫兹,而另一种方法(传递函数分析法(TFA)相位趋近于零)则表明高通滤波器的理论频率上限为 0.24 赫兹。我们研究了这些限制如何准确地代表 CA 的频率上限,此外还扩展了之前关于生物性别和整个心动周期的研究结果。16 名参与者(9 名女性和 7 名男性)在 0.05、0.10、0.15、0.20 和 0.25 Hz 频率下重复进行了蹲立动作,并对大脑中动脉和后动脉进行了电击。采用线性回归建模,并对性别和下蹲完成顺序进行调整,以比较 0.25 赫兹(高于 CA 的理论上限)的 TFA 增益和相位。TFA增益的CA频率上限在0.05-0.10赫兹范围内,而TFA相位在0.20-0.25赫兹范围内,并且在血管之间、性别之间和整个心动周期内保持一致。与男性相比,女性显示出更大的大脑中动脉增益(均为 P 0.072)。虽然在特定频率下的特定 TFA 指标存在性别差异,但大脑导管血管、心动周期阶段和生物性别之间的自动调节频率上限相似。未来的工作需要确定在滞后分析方面是否存在频率上限。
Examining the upper frequency limit of dynamic cerebral autoregulation: Considerations across the cardiac cycle during eucapnia.
There are differences within the literature regarding the upper frequency cut-off point of the dynamic cerebral autoregulation (CA) high-pass filter. The projection pursuit regression approach has demonstrated that the upper frequency limit is ∼0.07 Hz, whereas another approach [transfer function analysis (TFA) phase approaching zero] indicated a theoretical upper frequency limit for the high-pass filter of 0.24 Hz. We investigated how these limits accurately represent the CA upper frequency limit, in addition to extending earlier findings with respect to biological sexes and across the cardiac cycle. Sixteen participants (nine females and seven males) performed repeated squat-stand manoeuvres at frequencies of 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20 and 0.25 Hz, with insonation of the middle and posterior cerebral arteries. Linear regression modelling with adjustment for sex and order of squat completion was used to compared TFA gain and phase with 0.25 Hz (above the theoretical limit of CA). The upper frequency limit of CA with TFA gain was within the range of 0.05-0.10 Hz, whereas TFA phase was within the range of 0.20-0.25 Hz, and consistent between vessels, between sexes and across the cardiac cycle. Females displayed greater middle cerebral artery gain compared with males (all P < 0.047), and no phase differences were present (all P > 0.072). Although sex-specific differences were present for specific TFA metrics at a given frequency, the upper frequency limit of autoregulation was similar between cerebral conduit vessels, cardiac cycle phase and biological sex. Future work is warranted to determine whether an upper frequency limit exists with respect to hysteresis analyses.
期刊介绍:
Experimental Physiology publishes research papers that report novel insights into homeostatic and adaptive responses in health, as well as those that further our understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms in disease. We encourage papers that embrace the journal’s orientation of translation and integration, including studies of the adaptive responses to exercise, acute and chronic environmental stressors, growth and aging, and diseases where integrative homeostatic mechanisms play a key role in the response to and evolution of the disease process. Examples of such diseases include hypertension, heart failure, hypoxic lung disease, endocrine and neurological disorders. We are also keen to publish research that has a translational aspect or clinical application. Comparative physiology work that can be applied to aid the understanding human physiology is also encouraged.
Manuscripts that report the use of bioinformatic, genomic, molecular, proteomic and cellular techniques to provide novel insights into integrative physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms are welcomed.