分级运动疗法对严重呼吸系统疾病患者疲劳的影响:系统综述。

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM European Respiratory Review Pub Date : 2024-10-09 Print Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1183/16000617.0027-2024
Angela T Burge, Adelle M Gadowski, Lorena Romero, Guido Vagheggini, Anna Spathis, Natasha E Smallwood, Magnus Ekström, Anne E Holland
{"title":"分级运动疗法对严重呼吸系统疾病患者疲劳的影响:系统综述。","authors":"Angela T Burge, Adelle M Gadowski, Lorena Romero, Guido Vagheggini, Anna Spathis, Natasha E Smallwood, Magnus Ekström, Anne E Holland","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0027-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In adults with serious respiratory illness, fatigue is prevalent and under-recognised, with few treatment options. The aim of this review was to assess the impact of graded exercise therapy (GET) on fatigue in adults with serious respiratory illness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases were searched to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) testing GET (involving incremental increases in exercise from an established baseline) in adults with serious respiratory illness. The primary outcome was fatigue and secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and adverse events. Two authors independently screened for inclusion, evaluated risk of bias and extracted data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>76 RCTs were included with 3309 participants, most with a diagnosis of COPD or asthma. Reductions in fatigue measured by the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire fatigue domain score were demonstrated following GET consisting of aerobic with/without resistance training (mean difference (MD) 0.53 points, 95% CI 0.41-0.65, 11 RCTs, 624 participants) and GET using resistance training alone (MD 0.58 points, 95% CI 0.21-0.96, two RCTs, 82 participants) compared with usual care. Although the mean effect exceeded the minimal important difference, the lower end of the confidence intervals did not always exceed this threshold so the clinical significance could not be confirmed. GET consistently improved HRQoL in people with a range of chronic respiratory diseases on multiple HRQoL measures. No serious adverse events related to GET were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GET may improve fatigue alongside consistent improvements in HRQoL in people with serious respiratory illness. These findings support the use of GET in the care of people with serious respiratory illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11462302/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of graded exercise therapy on fatigue in people with serious respiratory illness: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Angela T Burge, Adelle M Gadowski, Lorena Romero, Guido Vagheggini, Anna Spathis, Natasha E Smallwood, Magnus Ekström, Anne E Holland\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/16000617.0027-2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In adults with serious respiratory illness, fatigue is prevalent and under-recognised, with few treatment options. The aim of this review was to assess the impact of graded exercise therapy (GET) on fatigue in adults with serious respiratory illness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases were searched to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) testing GET (involving incremental increases in exercise from an established baseline) in adults with serious respiratory illness. The primary outcome was fatigue and secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and adverse events. Two authors independently screened for inclusion, evaluated risk of bias and extracted data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>76 RCTs were included with 3309 participants, most with a diagnosis of COPD or asthma. Reductions in fatigue measured by the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire fatigue domain score were demonstrated following GET consisting of aerobic with/without resistance training (mean difference (MD) 0.53 points, 95% CI 0.41-0.65, 11 RCTs, 624 participants) and GET using resistance training alone (MD 0.58 points, 95% CI 0.21-0.96, two RCTs, 82 participants) compared with usual care. Although the mean effect exceeded the minimal important difference, the lower end of the confidence intervals did not always exceed this threshold so the clinical significance could not be confirmed. GET consistently improved HRQoL in people with a range of chronic respiratory diseases on multiple HRQoL measures. No serious adverse events related to GET were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GET may improve fatigue alongside consistent improvements in HRQoL in people with serious respiratory illness. These findings support the use of GET in the care of people with serious respiratory illness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Respiratory Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11462302/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Respiratory Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0027-2024\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0027-2024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在患有严重呼吸系统疾病的成年人中,疲劳是普遍存在的问题,但人们对其认识不足,治疗方法也不多。本综述旨在评估分级运动疗法(GET)对成年重症呼吸系统疾病患者疲劳的影响:方法:对电子数据库进行检索,以确定对患有严重呼吸系统疾病的成人进行分级运动疗法(涉及在既定基线上逐步增加运动量)测试的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结果是疲劳,次要结果是健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)和不良事件。两位作者独立筛选纳入研究、评估偏倚风险并提取数据:结果:共纳入了 76 项 RCT,3309 人参与了研究,其中大多数人被诊断患有慢性阻塞性肺病或哮喘。与常规护理相比,由有氧运动和/或无阻力训练组成的 GET(平均差异(MD)0.53 分,95% CI 0.41-0.65 ,11 项 RCT,624 名参与者)和仅使用阻力训练的 GET(MD 0.58 分,95% CI 0.21-0.96 ,2 项 RCT,82 名参与者)可通过慢性呼吸系统疾病问卷疲劳域评分测量疲劳程度。虽然平均效果超过了最小重要差异,但置信区间的下限并不总是超过这一临界值,因此临床意义无法确认。就多种 HRQoL 指标而言,GET 可持续改善各种慢性呼吸系统疾病患者的 HRQoL。没有与 GET 相关的严重不良事件报告:GET 可改善严重呼吸系统疾病患者的疲劳,同时持续改善其 HRQoL。这些研究结果支持在严重呼吸系统疾病患者的护理中使用 GET。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of graded exercise therapy on fatigue in people with serious respiratory illness: a systematic review.

Background: In adults with serious respiratory illness, fatigue is prevalent and under-recognised, with few treatment options. The aim of this review was to assess the impact of graded exercise therapy (GET) on fatigue in adults with serious respiratory illness.

Methods: Electronic databases were searched to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) testing GET (involving incremental increases in exercise from an established baseline) in adults with serious respiratory illness. The primary outcome was fatigue and secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and adverse events. Two authors independently screened for inclusion, evaluated risk of bias and extracted data.

Results: 76 RCTs were included with 3309 participants, most with a diagnosis of COPD or asthma. Reductions in fatigue measured by the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire fatigue domain score were demonstrated following GET consisting of aerobic with/without resistance training (mean difference (MD) 0.53 points, 95% CI 0.41-0.65, 11 RCTs, 624 participants) and GET using resistance training alone (MD 0.58 points, 95% CI 0.21-0.96, two RCTs, 82 participants) compared with usual care. Although the mean effect exceeded the minimal important difference, the lower end of the confidence intervals did not always exceed this threshold so the clinical significance could not be confirmed. GET consistently improved HRQoL in people with a range of chronic respiratory diseases on multiple HRQoL measures. No serious adverse events related to GET were reported.

Conclusion: GET may improve fatigue alongside consistent improvements in HRQoL in people with serious respiratory illness. These findings support the use of GET in the care of people with serious respiratory illness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Respiratory Review
European Respiratory Review Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
1.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Respiratory Review (ERR) is an open-access journal published by the European Respiratory Society (ERS), serving as a vital resource for respiratory professionals by delivering updates on medicine, science, and surgery in the field. ERR features state-of-the-art review articles, editorials, correspondence, and summaries of recent research findings and studies covering a wide range of topics including COPD, asthma, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease, lung cancer, tuberculosis, and pulmonary infections. Articles are published continuously and compiled into quarterly issues within a single annual volume.
期刊最新文献
Antibody-mediated protection against respiratory syncytial virus in children. Epidemiology of bronchiectasis. Epidemiology of severe asthma in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Impaired lung function and associated risk factors in children born prematurely: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Noninvasive diagnostic modalities and prediction models for detecting pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease: a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1