{"title":"加强颈动脉内膜切除术患者的术后镇痛:超声引导下颈动脉鞘阻滞联合颈浅神经丛阻滞的潜力:随机试验。","authors":"Anamarija Kruc, Lada Lijovic, Matteo Skrtic, Iva Pazur, Nikola Perisa, Tomislav Radocaj","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_834_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a common procedure conducted under regional anaesthesia, providing real-time cerebral function monitoring. Many different combinations of regional cervical blocks exist, and most offer adequate analgesia in intraoperative and postoperative recovery. This research compares a superficial cervical plexus block (SCB) alone and combined with an ultrasound (US)-guided carotid sheath block (CSB). The primary objective was to explore the length of the sensory block after combining SCB and CSB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients scheduled for nonemergency CEA surgery were randomised into two cohorts. The Subject group (28 participants) received US-guided CSB and SCB. The Control group (31 participants) received only an SCB. Both groups received 0.5% levobupivacaine (2 mg/kg) along with 2% lidocaine (2 mg/kg). The sensory block time and its initiation, analgesia and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were recorded before and after the block. The numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) was used to evaluate analgesia every 2 h for 12 h post block. Analysis of variance, Mann-Whitney U or log-rank test was used to analyse the distinction of selected variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The demographic characteristics were comparable across the cohorts. The Subject group demonstrated a significantly accelerated onset of sensory block (<i>P</i> = 0.029) and an extended time to first analgesia (<i>P</i> = 0.003). The sensory block was also substantially extended in the Subject group (<i>P</i> = 0.040). Postoperative pain (NPRS ≥1) within the first 12 h was more recurrent in the Control group (<i>P</i> = 0.048). NLR showed minimal disparity between the groups (<i>P</i> = 0.125).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining SCB and US-guided CSB effectively and safely extends postoperative analgesia for CEA surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11460807/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing postoperative analgesia in carotid endarterectomy patients: The potential of ultrasound-guided carotid sheath block combined with superficial cervical plexus block: A randomised trial.\",\"authors\":\"Anamarija Kruc, Lada Lijovic, Matteo Skrtic, Iva Pazur, Nikola Perisa, Tomislav Radocaj\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ija.ija_834_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a common procedure conducted under regional anaesthesia, providing real-time cerebral function monitoring. Many different combinations of regional cervical blocks exist, and most offer adequate analgesia in intraoperative and postoperative recovery. This research compares a superficial cervical plexus block (SCB) alone and combined with an ultrasound (US)-guided carotid sheath block (CSB). The primary objective was to explore the length of the sensory block after combining SCB and CSB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients scheduled for nonemergency CEA surgery were randomised into two cohorts. The Subject group (28 participants) received US-guided CSB and SCB. The Control group (31 participants) received only an SCB. Both groups received 0.5% levobupivacaine (2 mg/kg) along with 2% lidocaine (2 mg/kg). The sensory block time and its initiation, analgesia and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were recorded before and after the block. The numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) was used to evaluate analgesia every 2 h for 12 h post block. Analysis of variance, Mann-Whitney U or log-rank test was used to analyse the distinction of selected variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The demographic characteristics were comparable across the cohorts. The Subject group demonstrated a significantly accelerated onset of sensory block (<i>P</i> = 0.029) and an extended time to first analgesia (<i>P</i> = 0.003). The sensory block was also substantially extended in the Subject group (<i>P</i> = 0.040). Postoperative pain (NPRS ≥1) within the first 12 h was more recurrent in the Control group (<i>P</i> = 0.048). NLR showed minimal disparity between the groups (<i>P</i> = 0.125).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining SCB and US-guided CSB effectively and safely extends postoperative analgesia for CEA surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11460807/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_834_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_834_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景和目的:颈动脉内膜剥脱术(CEA)是在区域麻醉下进行的一种常见手术,可提供实时脑功能监测。目前有多种不同的颈部区域阻滞组合,大多数都能为术中和术后恢复提供足够的镇痛效果。本研究比较了单独的浅颈丛阻滞(SCB)和超声(US)引导下的颈动脉鞘阻滞(CSB)。主要目的是探讨结合 SCB 和 CSB 后感觉阻滞的长度:将计划接受非急诊 CEA 手术的患者随机分为两组。实验组(28 人)接受 US 引导的 CSB 和 SCB。对照组(31 人)仅接受 SCB。两组均接受 0.5% 左布比卡因(2 毫克/千克)和 2% 利多卡因(2 毫克/千克)。阻滞前后记录了感觉阻滞时间及其开始时间、镇痛和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)。在阻滞后的 12 小时内,每隔 2 小时使用数字疼痛评分量表(NPRS)评估镇痛效果。采用方差分析、曼-惠特尼 U 检验或对数秩检验分析选定变量之间的差异:结果:各组的人口统计学特征具有可比性。受试者组的感觉阻滞起始时间明显加快(P = 0.029),首次镇痛时间延长(P = 0.003)。受试者组的感觉阻滞时间也大大延长(P = 0.040)。对照组术后 12 小时内疼痛(NPRS ≥1)的复发率更高(P = 0.048)。两组间的 NLR 差异极小(P = 0.125):结论:将 SCB 和 US 引导 CSB 结合使用可有效、安全地延长 CEA 手术的术后镇痛时间。
Enhancing postoperative analgesia in carotid endarterectomy patients: The potential of ultrasound-guided carotid sheath block combined with superficial cervical plexus block: A randomised trial.
Background and aims: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a common procedure conducted under regional anaesthesia, providing real-time cerebral function monitoring. Many different combinations of regional cervical blocks exist, and most offer adequate analgesia in intraoperative and postoperative recovery. This research compares a superficial cervical plexus block (SCB) alone and combined with an ultrasound (US)-guided carotid sheath block (CSB). The primary objective was to explore the length of the sensory block after combining SCB and CSB.
Methods: Patients scheduled for nonemergency CEA surgery were randomised into two cohorts. The Subject group (28 participants) received US-guided CSB and SCB. The Control group (31 participants) received only an SCB. Both groups received 0.5% levobupivacaine (2 mg/kg) along with 2% lidocaine (2 mg/kg). The sensory block time and its initiation, analgesia and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were recorded before and after the block. The numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) was used to evaluate analgesia every 2 h for 12 h post block. Analysis of variance, Mann-Whitney U or log-rank test was used to analyse the distinction of selected variables.
Results: The demographic characteristics were comparable across the cohorts. The Subject group demonstrated a significantly accelerated onset of sensory block (P = 0.029) and an extended time to first analgesia (P = 0.003). The sensory block was also substantially extended in the Subject group (P = 0.040). Postoperative pain (NPRS ≥1) within the first 12 h was more recurrent in the Control group (P = 0.048). NLR showed minimal disparity between the groups (P = 0.125).
Conclusion: Combining SCB and US-guided CSB effectively and safely extends postoperative analgesia for CEA surgery.