前列腺癌幸存者的治疗后监测强度和总生存率(AFT-30)。

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY JNCI Cancer Spectrum Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1093/jncics/pkae099
Ronald C Chen, Ramsankar Basak, Stacie Dusetzina, Deborah S Usinger, Zahed Mohammed, Aaron D Falchook, Jessica R Schumacher, Amanda B Francescatti, Amanda Cuddy, George J Chang, Benjamin D Kozower, Caprice C Greenberg, Anne K Barber, Aaron J Katz
{"title":"前列腺癌幸存者的治疗后监测强度和总生存率(AFT-30)。","authors":"Ronald C Chen, Ramsankar Basak, Stacie Dusetzina, Deborah S Usinger, Zahed Mohammed, Aaron D Falchook, Jessica R Schumacher, Amanda B Francescatti, Amanda Cuddy, George J Chang, Benjamin D Kozower, Caprice C Greenberg, Anne K Barber, Aaron J Katz","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkae099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Posttreatment surveillance affects millions of cancer survivors, but empiric data to guide clinical practice are lacking. This study assessed whether the intensity of surveillance testing after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer is associated with overall survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer between 2005 and 2010 who underwent radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy at a Commission on Cancer-accredited facility were randomly sampled. Primary data collected from 10 147 patients sampled across 1007 facilities were linked with existing data from the National Cancer Database. Analysis examined whether intensity of surveillance measured as the number of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests in the first year after primary treatment (categorized as 0-1 [low intensity], 2 [medium], or ≥3 [high intensity] PSA tests) was associated with overall survival. Secondary outcomes included recurrence-free survival (RFS) and subsequent use of imaging tests, biopsy procedures, and salvage treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median follow-up exceeded 8 years from prostate cancer diagnosis. Overall survival was not statistically significantly different across surveillance intensity groups among radiation therapy (P = .59) or radical prostatectomy (P = .29) patients. RFS was not statistically significantly different across surveillance intensity groups for radiation therapy (P = .13) patients but was for radical prostatectomy (P = .01) patients with high intensity associated with the worst RFS. In both treatments, higher surveillance intensity was associated with more procedures and salvage treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with localized prostate cancer, more frequent PSA surveillance testing after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy was associated with increased procedures and salvage treatments but not overall survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Posttreatment surveillance intensity and overall survival in prostate cancer survivors (AFT-30).\",\"authors\":\"Ronald C Chen, Ramsankar Basak, Stacie Dusetzina, Deborah S Usinger, Zahed Mohammed, Aaron D Falchook, Jessica R Schumacher, Amanda B Francescatti, Amanda Cuddy, George J Chang, Benjamin D Kozower, Caprice C Greenberg, Anne K Barber, Aaron J Katz\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jncics/pkae099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Posttreatment surveillance affects millions of cancer survivors, but empiric data to guide clinical practice are lacking. This study assessed whether the intensity of surveillance testing after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer is associated with overall survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer between 2005 and 2010 who underwent radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy at a Commission on Cancer-accredited facility were randomly sampled. Primary data collected from 10 147 patients sampled across 1007 facilities were linked with existing data from the National Cancer Database. Analysis examined whether intensity of surveillance measured as the number of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests in the first year after primary treatment (categorized as 0-1 [low intensity], 2 [medium], or ≥3 [high intensity] PSA tests) was associated with overall survival. Secondary outcomes included recurrence-free survival (RFS) and subsequent use of imaging tests, biopsy procedures, and salvage treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median follow-up exceeded 8 years from prostate cancer diagnosis. Overall survival was not statistically significantly different across surveillance intensity groups among radiation therapy (P = .59) or radical prostatectomy (P = .29) patients. RFS was not statistically significantly different across surveillance intensity groups for radiation therapy (P = .13) patients but was for radical prostatectomy (P = .01) patients with high intensity associated with the worst RFS. In both treatments, higher surveillance intensity was associated with more procedures and salvage treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with localized prostate cancer, more frequent PSA surveillance testing after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy was associated with increased procedures and salvage treatments but not overall survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JNCI Cancer Spectrum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JNCI Cancer Spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkae099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkae099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:治疗后监测影响着数百万癌症幸存者,但缺乏经验数据来指导临床实践。本研究评估了局部前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术(RP)或放射治疗(RT)后监测检测的强度是否与总生存率有关:方法:随机抽样 2005 年至 2010 年期间确诊为局部前列腺癌并在癌症委员会认可的医疗机构接受前列腺癌根治术或放疗的男性患者。从 1007 家医疗机构的 10147 名患者中收集的原始数据与国家癌症数据库中的现有数据进行了关联。分析检验了以初级治疗后第一年的 PSA 检测次数(分为 0-1 次(低强度)、2 次(中强度)或≥ 3 次(高强度)PSA 检测)来衡量的监测强度是否与总生存率相关。次要结果包括无复发生存率(RFS)以及随后使用的成像检测、活检程序和挽救治疗:结果:自前列腺癌确诊起,中位随访时间超过 8 年。RT(P = .59)或RP(P = .29)患者的OS在不同监测强度组间无明显统计学差异。RT(P = .13)患者的 RFS 在不同监控强度组间无明显统计学差异,但 RP(P = .01)患者的 RFS 与高监控强度相关,RFS 较差。在两种治疗方法中,较高的监控强度与较多的手术和挽救治疗有关:结论:在局部前列腺癌患者中,根治性前列腺切除术或放射治疗后更频繁地进行 PSA 监测与手术和挽救治疗的增加有关,但与总生存率无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Posttreatment surveillance intensity and overall survival in prostate cancer survivors (AFT-30).

Background: Posttreatment surveillance affects millions of cancer survivors, but empiric data to guide clinical practice are lacking. This study assessed whether the intensity of surveillance testing after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer is associated with overall survival.

Methods: Men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer between 2005 and 2010 who underwent radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy at a Commission on Cancer-accredited facility were randomly sampled. Primary data collected from 10 147 patients sampled across 1007 facilities were linked with existing data from the National Cancer Database. Analysis examined whether intensity of surveillance measured as the number of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests in the first year after primary treatment (categorized as 0-1 [low intensity], 2 [medium], or ≥3 [high intensity] PSA tests) was associated with overall survival. Secondary outcomes included recurrence-free survival (RFS) and subsequent use of imaging tests, biopsy procedures, and salvage treatment.

Results: Median follow-up exceeded 8 years from prostate cancer diagnosis. Overall survival was not statistically significantly different across surveillance intensity groups among radiation therapy (P = .59) or radical prostatectomy (P = .29) patients. RFS was not statistically significantly different across surveillance intensity groups for radiation therapy (P = .13) patients but was for radical prostatectomy (P = .01) patients with high intensity associated with the worst RFS. In both treatments, higher surveillance intensity was associated with more procedures and salvage treatments.

Conclusions: In patients with localized prostate cancer, more frequent PSA surveillance testing after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy was associated with increased procedures and salvage treatments but not overall survival.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
JNCI Cancer Spectrum Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Association between GLP-1RA use and progression of MGUS to Multiple Myeloma among diabetic patients. Sexual Function and Satisfaction in Young Women with Breast Cancer: A Five-Year Prospective Study. County-level racial disparities in prostate cancer specific mortality from 2005 to 2020. Low CD86 expression is a predictive biomarker for clinical response to the therapeutic human papillomavirus vaccine IGMKK16E7: results of a post hoc analysis. Neighborhood vulnerability and associations with poor health-related quality of life among adult survivors of childhood cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1