椅旁制作局部冠的多中心前瞻性临床研究:锂-氧化锆玻璃陶瓷修复体的 5 年结果。

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1111/jerd.13328
Sven Rinke, Emanuel Reinermann, Andreas Leha, Matthias Roediger, Dirk Ziebolz
{"title":"椅旁制作局部冠的多中心前瞻性临床研究:锂-氧化锆玻璃陶瓷修复体的 5 年结果。","authors":"Sven Rinke,&nbsp;Emanuel Reinermann,&nbsp;Andreas Leha,&nbsp;Matthias Roediger,&nbsp;Dirk Ziebolz","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Clinical evaluation of chairside-fabricated lithia-zirconia glass–ceramic (LZGC) partial crowns (CCPCs) in a multicenter practice-based study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Seventy-one patients were restored with 92 adhesively luted CCPCs (Cerec SW 4.2/Cerec MC XL/Celtra Duo) in three private dental clinics (C1–C3). Time-dependent (Kaplan–Meier) survival rates (SVR) and success rates (SCR) were calculated. The following possible covariates of SVRs and SCRs were evaluated in a Cox regression model: Restoration position (premolar/molar), luting material (Variolink/Calibra), and operator (C1–C3).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seventy-three CCPCs were placed in 59 patients and were included in the study (mean observational period: 58.0 ± 15 months). Four complete failures (two tooth fractures, one restoration fracture, and one endodontic failure) were recorded. All failures and interventions occurred in one of the three centers (5-year SCR: C1 + C2: 100%; C3: 71%; 95% confidence interval: [0.55; 0.87]). Additionally, three biological, and two technical complications required clinical intervention to maintain function, and all occurred in C3. Restorations placed in C1 and C2 showed a significantly reduced risk for failure/intervention (hazard ratio = 0.103, <i>p</i> = 0.026) compared with restorations placed in C3.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>LZGC CCPCs showed good five-year clinical performance. However, SVRs and SCRs were significantly influenced by the operator. Additional clinical data are required for a more detailed investigation of this effect.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":"37 2","pages":"561-570"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927800/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicenter Prospective Clinical Study on Chairside-Fabricated Partial Crowns: 5-Year Results for Lithia-Zirconia Glass–Ceramic Restorations\",\"authors\":\"Sven Rinke,&nbsp;Emanuel Reinermann,&nbsp;Andreas Leha,&nbsp;Matthias Roediger,&nbsp;Dirk Ziebolz\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jerd.13328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Clinical evaluation of chairside-fabricated lithia-zirconia glass–ceramic (LZGC) partial crowns (CCPCs) in a multicenter practice-based study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Seventy-one patients were restored with 92 adhesively luted CCPCs (Cerec SW 4.2/Cerec MC XL/Celtra Duo) in three private dental clinics (C1–C3). Time-dependent (Kaplan–Meier) survival rates (SVR) and success rates (SCR) were calculated. The following possible covariates of SVRs and SCRs were evaluated in a Cox regression model: Restoration position (premolar/molar), luting material (Variolink/Calibra), and operator (C1–C3).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Seventy-three CCPCs were placed in 59 patients and were included in the study (mean observational period: 58.0 ± 15 months). Four complete failures (two tooth fractures, one restoration fracture, and one endodontic failure) were recorded. All failures and interventions occurred in one of the three centers (5-year SCR: C1 + C2: 100%; C3: 71%; 95% confidence interval: [0.55; 0.87]). Additionally, three biological, and two technical complications required clinical intervention to maintain function, and all occurred in C3. Restorations placed in C1 and C2 showed a significantly reduced risk for failure/intervention (hazard ratio = 0.103, <i>p</i> = 0.026) compared with restorations placed in C3.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>LZGC CCPCs showed good five-year clinical performance. However, SVRs and SCRs were significantly influenced by the operator. Additional clinical data are required for a more detailed investigation of this effect.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"37 2\",\"pages\":\"561-570\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927800/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jerd.13328\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jerd.13328","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在以多中心实践为基础的研究中,对椅旁制作的氧化锆锂玻璃陶瓷局部冠(CCPC)进行临床评估:在一项以多中心实践为基础的研究中,对椅旁制作的氧化锆锂玻璃陶瓷(LZGC)局部冠(CCPCs)进行临床评估:在三家私人牙科诊所(C1-C3)为 71 名患者修复了 92 个粘接衬垫 CCPC(Cerec SW 4.2/Cerec MC XL/Celtra Duo)。计算了与时间相关的(Kaplan-Meier)存活率(SVR)和成功率(SCR)。在 Cox 回归模型中评估了 SVR 和 SCR 的下列可能协变量:修复位置(前臼齿/臼齿)、粘结材料(Variolink/Calibra)和操作者(C1-C3):59名患者共安装了73颗CCPC,并纳入研究(平均观察时间:58.0 ± 15个月)。共记录到四次完全失败(两次牙齿折断、一次修复体折断和一次牙髓治疗失败)。所有失败和干预均发生在三个中心中的一个(5 年 SCR:C1 + C2:100%;C3:71%;95% 置信区间:[0.55; 0.87])。此外,三个生物并发症和两个技术并发症需要临床干预来维持功能,这些并发症都发生在 C3。与C3修复体相比,C1和C2修复体的失败/干预风险明显降低(危险比=0.103,P=0.026):结论:LZGC CCPC 的五年临床表现良好。结论:LZGC CCPC 的五年临床表现良好,但 SVR 和 SCR 受操作者的影响较大。要对这种影响进行更详细的研究,还需要更多的临床数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multicenter Prospective Clinical Study on Chairside-Fabricated Partial Crowns: 5-Year Results for Lithia-Zirconia Glass–Ceramic Restorations

Objectives

Clinical evaluation of chairside-fabricated lithia-zirconia glass–ceramic (LZGC) partial crowns (CCPCs) in a multicenter practice-based study.

Materials and Methods

Seventy-one patients were restored with 92 adhesively luted CCPCs (Cerec SW 4.2/Cerec MC XL/Celtra Duo) in three private dental clinics (C1–C3). Time-dependent (Kaplan–Meier) survival rates (SVR) and success rates (SCR) were calculated. The following possible covariates of SVRs and SCRs were evaluated in a Cox regression model: Restoration position (premolar/molar), luting material (Variolink/Calibra), and operator (C1–C3).

Results

Seventy-three CCPCs were placed in 59 patients and were included in the study (mean observational period: 58.0 ± 15 months). Four complete failures (two tooth fractures, one restoration fracture, and one endodontic failure) were recorded. All failures and interventions occurred in one of the three centers (5-year SCR: C1 + C2: 100%; C3: 71%; 95% confidence interval: [0.55; 0.87]). Additionally, three biological, and two technical complications required clinical intervention to maintain function, and all occurred in C3. Restorations placed in C1 and C2 showed a significantly reduced risk for failure/intervention (hazard ratio = 0.103, p = 0.026) compared with restorations placed in C3.

Conclusions

LZGC CCPCs showed good five-year clinical performance. However, SVRs and SCRs were significantly influenced by the operator. Additional clinical data are required for a more detailed investigation of this effect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features. The range of topics covered in the journal includes: - Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts - Implants - Conservative adhesive restorations - Tooth Whitening - Prosthodontic materials and techniques - Dental materials - Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics - Esthetics related research - Innovations in esthetics
期刊最新文献
A 10-Step Digital Workflow for Immediate Implant Placement and Loading in Terminal Dentition Patients. Efficacy of Surface Sealant on Clinical Performance of Composite Resin Restorations: A Systematic Review. Analyzing the Stability of White Spot Lesions Treated Using CPP-ACP Coupled With Universal Adhesive Resin Against an Acidic Erosion Challenge. Effect of Delayed Exposure to Staining Agents on the Color Stability and Translucency of Esthetic Resin Composites. Resin Infiltration for Esthetic Improvement of Enamel Defects in Primary Incisors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1