椅旁制作局部冠的多中心前瞻性临床研究:锂-氧化锆玻璃陶瓷修复体的 5 年结果。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1111/jerd.13328
Sven Rinke, Emanuel Schmidt, Andreas Leha, Matthias Roediger, Dirk Ziebolz
{"title":"椅旁制作局部冠的多中心前瞻性临床研究:锂-氧化锆玻璃陶瓷修复体的 5 年结果。","authors":"Sven Rinke, Emanuel Schmidt, Andreas Leha, Matthias Roediger, Dirk Ziebolz","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Clinical evaluation of chairside-fabricated lithia-zirconia glass-ceramic (LZGC) partial crowns (CCPCs) in a multicenter practice-based study.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Seventy-one patients were restored with 92 adhesively luted CCPCs (Cerec SW 4.2/Cerec MC XL/Celtra Duo) in three private dental clinics (C1-C3). Time-dependent (Kaplan-Meier) survival rates (SVR) and success rates (SCR) were calculated. The following possible covariates of SVRs and SCRs were evaluated in a Cox regression model: Restoration position (premolar/molar), luting material (Variolink/Calibra), and operator (C1-C3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-three CCPCs were placed in 59 patients and were included in the study (mean observational period: 58.0 ± 15 months). Four complete failures (two tooth fractures, one restoration fracture, and one endodontic failure) were recorded. All failures and interventions occurred in one of the three centers (5-year SCR: C1 + C2: 100%; C3: 71%; 95% confidence interval: [0.55; 0.87]). Additionally, three biological, and two technical complications required clinical intervention to maintain function, and all occurred in C3. Restorations placed in C1 and C2 showed a significantly reduced risk for failure/intervention (hazard ratio = 0.103, p = 0.026) compared with restorations placed in C3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LZGC CCPCs showed good five-year clinical performance. However, SVRs and SCRs were significantly influenced by the operator. Additional clinical data are required for a more detailed investigation of this effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicenter Prospective Clinical Study on Chairside-Fabricated Partial Crowns: 5-Year Results for Lithia-Zirconia Glass-Ceramic Restorations.\",\"authors\":\"Sven Rinke, Emanuel Schmidt, Andreas Leha, Matthias Roediger, Dirk Ziebolz\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jerd.13328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Clinical evaluation of chairside-fabricated lithia-zirconia glass-ceramic (LZGC) partial crowns (CCPCs) in a multicenter practice-based study.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Seventy-one patients were restored with 92 adhesively luted CCPCs (Cerec SW 4.2/Cerec MC XL/Celtra Duo) in three private dental clinics (C1-C3). Time-dependent (Kaplan-Meier) survival rates (SVR) and success rates (SCR) were calculated. The following possible covariates of SVRs and SCRs were evaluated in a Cox regression model: Restoration position (premolar/molar), luting material (Variolink/Calibra), and operator (C1-C3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-three CCPCs were placed in 59 patients and were included in the study (mean observational period: 58.0 ± 15 months). Four complete failures (two tooth fractures, one restoration fracture, and one endodontic failure) were recorded. All failures and interventions occurred in one of the three centers (5-year SCR: C1 + C2: 100%; C3: 71%; 95% confidence interval: [0.55; 0.87]). Additionally, three biological, and two technical complications required clinical intervention to maintain function, and all occurred in C3. Restorations placed in C1 and C2 showed a significantly reduced risk for failure/intervention (hazard ratio = 0.103, p = 0.026) compared with restorations placed in C3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LZGC CCPCs showed good five-year clinical performance. However, SVRs and SCRs were significantly influenced by the operator. Additional clinical data are required for a more detailed investigation of this effect.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13328\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13328","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在以多中心实践为基础的研究中,对椅旁制作的氧化锆锂玻璃陶瓷局部冠(CCPC)进行临床评估:在一项以多中心实践为基础的研究中,对椅旁制作的氧化锆锂玻璃陶瓷(LZGC)局部冠(CCPCs)进行临床评估:在三家私人牙科诊所(C1-C3)为 71 名患者修复了 92 个粘接衬垫 CCPC(Cerec SW 4.2/Cerec MC XL/Celtra Duo)。计算了与时间相关的(Kaplan-Meier)存活率(SVR)和成功率(SCR)。在 Cox 回归模型中评估了 SVR 和 SCR 的下列可能协变量:修复位置(前臼齿/臼齿)、粘结材料(Variolink/Calibra)和操作者(C1-C3):59名患者共安装了73颗CCPC,并纳入研究(平均观察时间:58.0 ± 15个月)。共记录到四次完全失败(两次牙齿折断、一次修复体折断和一次牙髓治疗失败)。所有失败和干预均发生在三个中心中的一个(5 年 SCR:C1 + C2:100%;C3:71%;95% 置信区间:[0.55; 0.87])。此外,三个生物并发症和两个技术并发症需要临床干预来维持功能,这些并发症都发生在 C3。与C3修复体相比,C1和C2修复体的失败/干预风险明显降低(危险比=0.103,P=0.026):结论:LZGC CCPC 的五年临床表现良好。结论:LZGC CCPC 的五年临床表现良好,但 SVR 和 SCR 受操作者的影响较大。要对这种影响进行更详细的研究,还需要更多的临床数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multicenter Prospective Clinical Study on Chairside-Fabricated Partial Crowns: 5-Year Results for Lithia-Zirconia Glass-Ceramic Restorations.

Objectives: Clinical evaluation of chairside-fabricated lithia-zirconia glass-ceramic (LZGC) partial crowns (CCPCs) in a multicenter practice-based study.

Materials and methods: Seventy-one patients were restored with 92 adhesively luted CCPCs (Cerec SW 4.2/Cerec MC XL/Celtra Duo) in three private dental clinics (C1-C3). Time-dependent (Kaplan-Meier) survival rates (SVR) and success rates (SCR) were calculated. The following possible covariates of SVRs and SCRs were evaluated in a Cox regression model: Restoration position (premolar/molar), luting material (Variolink/Calibra), and operator (C1-C3).

Results: Seventy-three CCPCs were placed in 59 patients and were included in the study (mean observational period: 58.0 ± 15 months). Four complete failures (two tooth fractures, one restoration fracture, and one endodontic failure) were recorded. All failures and interventions occurred in one of the three centers (5-year SCR: C1 + C2: 100%; C3: 71%; 95% confidence interval: [0.55; 0.87]). Additionally, three biological, and two technical complications required clinical intervention to maintain function, and all occurred in C3. Restorations placed in C1 and C2 showed a significantly reduced risk for failure/intervention (hazard ratio = 0.103, p = 0.026) compared with restorations placed in C3.

Conclusions: LZGC CCPCs showed good five-year clinical performance. However, SVRs and SCRs were significantly influenced by the operator. Additional clinical data are required for a more detailed investigation of this effect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features. The range of topics covered in the journal includes: - Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts - Implants - Conservative adhesive restorations - Tooth Whitening - Prosthodontic materials and techniques - Dental materials - Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics - Esthetics related research - Innovations in esthetics
期刊最新文献
Bleaching Gels and Light-Emitting Diodes: Comparison of Tooth Color Change. Clinical Decision-Making of Repair vs. Replacement of Defective Direct Dental Restorations: A Multinational Cross-Sectional Study With Meta-Analysis. Does the Transillumination Technique Using a Diagnostic White Tip Influence the Degree of Conversion of the Infiltrant Resin? A Case Report With In Vitro Insights: A New Technique to Improve the Predictability During the Application of Resin Infiltration: Transillumination Using a Diagnostic White Tip. Digital Approach Provides Predictability in Increasing the VDO in Erosive Wear: Clinical Technique and 9-Year Follow-Up. Alveolar Bone Reconstruction Simultaneous to Implant Removal due to Advanced Peri-Implantitis Defects: A Proof of Concept.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1