{"title":"可穿戴设备训练对中风患者上肢运动功能的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Qianqian Song, Qin Qin, Lorna Kwai Ping Suen, Guangmei Liang, Haixia Qin, Lingling Zhang","doi":"10.1177/03000605241285858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of wearable device training on improving upper limb motor function in patients who experienced strokes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang, and VIP databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the effectiveness of wearable device training in improving upper limb motor function in patients with stroke. Two investigators independently screened studies by their titles and abstracts and cross-checked, downloaded, and evaluated the results. Disagreements were resolved by a third highly experienced researcher. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. This meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (registration No. CRD42023421633).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study comprised 508 patients from 14 RCTs. The experimental group assessed various wearable devices, including 3D-printed dynamic orthoses, inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors, electrical stimulation devices, and virtual reality (VR) devices for virtual interactive training. The control group received traditional rehabilitation therapies, including physical and conventional rehabilitation. The experimental group scored better on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) scale (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07, 0.45) and Box and Block Test (BBT) (SMD 0.43, 95% CI 0.17, 0.69) versus controls. No significant intergroup differences were observed in the Action Research Arm Test (SMD 0.20, 95% CI -0.15, 0.55), motor activity log (mean difference [MD] 0.32, 95% CI -0.54, 0.33), and modified Ashworth scale (MD -0.08, 95% CI -0.81, 0.64). The probability rankings of wearable devices that improved FMA-UE scores in patients with stroke were: orthotic devices, with the highest probability ranking of 0.45, followed by sensor devices at 0.23, electrical stimulation devices at 0.21, and VR devices at 0.11.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Wearable device training was found to significantly improve upper limb motor function in patients with stroke, particularly for large-range movements. Improvements in FMA-UE and BBT scores reflected reduced impairment and enhanced manual dexterity, respectively. However, the training had no significant effect on hand movement frequency, fine motor skills, or spasticity. Among the different wearable devices tested, orthoses produced the most effective results.</p>","PeriodicalId":16129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Medical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11529673/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of wearable device training on upper limb motor function in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Qianqian Song, Qin Qin, Lorna Kwai Ping Suen, Guangmei Liang, Haixia Qin, Lingling Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03000605241285858\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of wearable device training on improving upper limb motor function in patients who experienced strokes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang, and VIP databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the effectiveness of wearable device training in improving upper limb motor function in patients with stroke. Two investigators independently screened studies by their titles and abstracts and cross-checked, downloaded, and evaluated the results. Disagreements were resolved by a third highly experienced researcher. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. This meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (registration No. CRD42023421633).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study comprised 508 patients from 14 RCTs. The experimental group assessed various wearable devices, including 3D-printed dynamic orthoses, inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors, electrical stimulation devices, and virtual reality (VR) devices for virtual interactive training. The control group received traditional rehabilitation therapies, including physical and conventional rehabilitation. The experimental group scored better on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) scale (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07, 0.45) and Box and Block Test (BBT) (SMD 0.43, 95% CI 0.17, 0.69) versus controls. No significant intergroup differences were observed in the Action Research Arm Test (SMD 0.20, 95% CI -0.15, 0.55), motor activity log (mean difference [MD] 0.32, 95% CI -0.54, 0.33), and modified Ashworth scale (MD -0.08, 95% CI -0.81, 0.64). The probability rankings of wearable devices that improved FMA-UE scores in patients with stroke were: orthotic devices, with the highest probability ranking of 0.45, followed by sensor devices at 0.23, electrical stimulation devices at 0.21, and VR devices at 0.11.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Wearable device training was found to significantly improve upper limb motor function in patients with stroke, particularly for large-range movements. Improvements in FMA-UE and BBT scores reflected reduced impairment and enhanced manual dexterity, respectively. However, the training had no significant effect on hand movement frequency, fine motor skills, or spasticity. Among the different wearable devices tested, orthoses produced the most effective results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Medical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11529673/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605241285858\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605241285858","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估可穿戴设备训练对改善脑卒中患者上肢运动功能的效果:评估可穿戴设备训练对改善脑卒中患者上肢运动功能的效果:方法:在 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、MEDLINE、SCOPUS、中国国家知识基础设施、万方数据库和 VIP 数据库中检索评估可穿戴设备训练对改善脑卒中患者上肢运动功能效果的随机对照试验(RCT)。两名研究人员根据研究标题和摘要对研究进行独立筛选,并对结果进行交叉核对、下载和评估。出现分歧时由第三位经验丰富的研究人员解决。偏倚风险采用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具进行评估。该荟萃分析已在 PROSPERO(注册号:CRD42023421633)上注册:本研究包括来自 14 项研究性临床试验的 508 名患者。实验组评估了各种可穿戴设备,包括 3D 打印动态矫形器、惯性测量单元 (IMU) 传感器、电刺激设备和用于虚拟互动训练的虚拟现实 (VR) 设备。对照组接受传统康复疗法,包括物理康复和常规康复。与对照组相比,实验组在 Fugl-Meyer 评估(FMA-UE)量表(标准化平均差 [SMD] 0.26,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.07,0.45)和方框和块测试(BBT)(SMD 0.43,95% CI 0.17,0.69)上得分更高。在行动研究臂测试(SMD 0.20,95% CI -0.15,0.55)、运动活动日志(平均差 [MD]0.32,95% CI -0.54,0.33)和改良阿什沃斯量表(MD -0.08,95% CI -0.81,0.64)方面未观察到明显的组间差异。可穿戴设备改善脑卒中患者 FMA-UE 评分的概率排名是:矫形设备的概率排名最高,为 0.45,其次是传感器设备,为 0.23,电刺激设备为 0.21,VR 设备为 0.11:研究发现,可穿戴设备训练可显著改善脑卒中患者的上肢运动功能,尤其是大范围运动功能。FMA-UE和BBT评分的提高分别反映了功能障碍的减轻和手灵活性的增强。不过,训练对手部运动频率、精细运动技能或痉挛没有明显影响。在测试的各种可穿戴设备中,矫形器的效果最好。
Effects of wearable device training on upper limb motor function in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Objective: To evaluate the effect of wearable device training on improving upper limb motor function in patients who experienced strokes.
Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang, and VIP databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the effectiveness of wearable device training in improving upper limb motor function in patients with stroke. Two investigators independently screened studies by their titles and abstracts and cross-checked, downloaded, and evaluated the results. Disagreements were resolved by a third highly experienced researcher. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. This meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (registration No. CRD42023421633).
Results: This study comprised 508 patients from 14 RCTs. The experimental group assessed various wearable devices, including 3D-printed dynamic orthoses, inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors, electrical stimulation devices, and virtual reality (VR) devices for virtual interactive training. The control group received traditional rehabilitation therapies, including physical and conventional rehabilitation. The experimental group scored better on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) scale (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07, 0.45) and Box and Block Test (BBT) (SMD 0.43, 95% CI 0.17, 0.69) versus controls. No significant intergroup differences were observed in the Action Research Arm Test (SMD 0.20, 95% CI -0.15, 0.55), motor activity log (mean difference [MD] 0.32, 95% CI -0.54, 0.33), and modified Ashworth scale (MD -0.08, 95% CI -0.81, 0.64). The probability rankings of wearable devices that improved FMA-UE scores in patients with stroke were: orthotic devices, with the highest probability ranking of 0.45, followed by sensor devices at 0.23, electrical stimulation devices at 0.21, and VR devices at 0.11.
Conclusions: Wearable device training was found to significantly improve upper limb motor function in patients with stroke, particularly for large-range movements. Improvements in FMA-UE and BBT scores reflected reduced impairment and enhanced manual dexterity, respectively. However, the training had no significant effect on hand movement frequency, fine motor skills, or spasticity. Among the different wearable devices tested, orthoses produced the most effective results.
期刊介绍:
_Journal of International Medical Research_ is a leading international journal for rapid publication of original medical, pre-clinical and clinical research, reviews, preliminary and pilot studies on a page charge basis.
As a service to authors, every article accepted by peer review will be given a full technical edit to make papers as accessible and readable to the international medical community as rapidly as possible.
Once the technical edit queries have been answered to the satisfaction of the journal, the paper will be published and made available freely to everyone under a creative commons licence.
Symposium proceedings, summaries of presentations or collections of medical, pre-clinical or clinical data on a specific topic are welcome for publication as supplements.
Print ISSN: 0300-0605