研究精神症状评估中的一致性:帕金森氏症痴呆症双人组的启示。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Movement Disorders Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1002/mdc3.14225
Blake Beehler, Michelle H S Tosin, Glenn T Stebbins, Christopher G Goetz
{"title":"研究精神症状评估中的一致性:帕金森氏症痴呆症双人组的启示。","authors":"Blake Beehler, Michelle H S Tosin, Glenn T Stebbins, Christopher G Goetz","doi":"10.1002/mdc3.14225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychosis and cognitive decline often co-occur in Parkinson's Disease (PD), which complicates assessment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We measured agreement between patients with PD and dementia (PDD) and care partners (CPs) in their independent evaluation of PD-related psychotic symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared responses to a PD psychosis rating scale (SAPS-PD) in 21 dyads of patients with PDD and cognitively normal CPs. We assessed the concordance of responses using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Following the psychosis assessment, the clinician used all available information and adjudicated who provided the most reliable responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dyads demonstrated poor concordance in summary scores (ICC = 0.464). Six of the nine individual items had poor agreement. The clinician adjudicated the patient's response as the more reliable in 71.4% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although many psychotic symptoms are internal and not observable, in the context of PDD, both patient and CP inputs are valuable, but final adjudication favors patient responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":19029,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining Agreement in Psychotic Symptom Assessment: Insights from Parkinson's Disease Dementia Dyads.\",\"authors\":\"Blake Beehler, Michelle H S Tosin, Glenn T Stebbins, Christopher G Goetz\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mdc3.14225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychosis and cognitive decline often co-occur in Parkinson's Disease (PD), which complicates assessment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We measured agreement between patients with PD and dementia (PDD) and care partners (CPs) in their independent evaluation of PD-related psychotic symptoms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared responses to a PD psychosis rating scale (SAPS-PD) in 21 dyads of patients with PDD and cognitively normal CPs. We assessed the concordance of responses using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Following the psychosis assessment, the clinician used all available information and adjudicated who provided the most reliable responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dyads demonstrated poor concordance in summary scores (ICC = 0.464). Six of the nine individual items had poor agreement. The clinician adjudicated the patient's response as the more reliable in 71.4% of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although many psychotic symptoms are internal and not observable, in the context of PDD, both patient and CP inputs are valuable, but final adjudication favors patient responses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.14225\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.14225","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:帕金森病(PD)患者常常同时出现精神病和认知能力下降,这使得评估工作变得复杂:我们测量了帕金森病和痴呆症(PDD)患者与护理伙伴(CP)在独立评估帕金森病相关精神病症状时的一致性:方法:我们比较了 21 组 PDD 患者和认知能力正常的 CP 对 PD 精神病评级量表(SAPS-PD)的反应。我们使用类内相关系数(ICC)评估了回答的一致性。在进行精神病评估后,临床医生使用所有可用信息,并裁定谁的回答最可靠:结果:在总分上,两人的一致性较差(ICC = 0.464)。在九个单项中,有六个项目的一致性较差。在 71.4% 的案例中,临床医生判定患者的回答更可靠:结论:虽然许多精神病症状是内在的,无法观察,但在 PDD 的情况下,患者和 CP 的意见都很有价值,但最终裁定更倾向于患者的回答。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining Agreement in Psychotic Symptom Assessment: Insights from Parkinson's Disease Dementia Dyads.

Background: Psychosis and cognitive decline often co-occur in Parkinson's Disease (PD), which complicates assessment.

Objective: We measured agreement between patients with PD and dementia (PDD) and care partners (CPs) in their independent evaluation of PD-related psychotic symptoms.

Methods: We compared responses to a PD psychosis rating scale (SAPS-PD) in 21 dyads of patients with PDD and cognitively normal CPs. We assessed the concordance of responses using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Following the psychosis assessment, the clinician used all available information and adjudicated who provided the most reliable responses.

Results: Dyads demonstrated poor concordance in summary scores (ICC = 0.464). Six of the nine individual items had poor agreement. The clinician adjudicated the patient's response as the more reliable in 71.4% of cases.

Conclusions: Although many psychotic symptoms are internal and not observable, in the context of PDD, both patient and CP inputs are valuable, but final adjudication favors patient responses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
218
期刊介绍: Movement Disorders Clinical Practice- is an online-only journal committed to publishing high quality peer reviewed articles related to clinical aspects of movement disorders which broadly include phenomenology (interesting case/case series/rarities), investigative (for e.g- genetics, imaging), translational (phenotype-genotype or other) and treatment aspects (clinical guidelines, diagnostic and treatment algorithms)
期刊最新文献
MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Tremor in Fragile X-Associated Tremor/Ataxia Syndrome. Association of Hemispheric Asymmetry of Dopamine-Transporter Binding with Risk of Parkinsonian Depression. Patient Perspectives on Upper-Limb Daily Function in Parkinson's Disease. Can We Better Predict the Timing for Medication Initiation in Early PD? Combined Habit Reversal Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Treatment of Tics in Tourette Syndrome: A Pilot Study of Effectiveness and Response Duration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1