MDMA辅助心理疗法治疗创伤后应激障碍:随机对照试验(RCTs)的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES Neuropsychopharmacology Reports Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1002/npr2.12485
Ghada Shahrour, Kainat Sohail, Safa Elrais, Muhammad Hamza Khan, Javeria Javeid, Khubaib Samdani, Hajra Mansoor, Syed Izhar Hussain, Dhruvikumari Sharma, Muhammad Ehsan, Abdulqadir J Nashwan
{"title":"MDMA辅助心理疗法治疗创伤后应激障碍:随机对照试验(RCTs)的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ghada Shahrour, Kainat Sohail, Safa Elrais, Muhammad Hamza Khan, Javeria Javeid, Khubaib Samdani, Hajra Mansoor, Syed Izhar Hussain, Dhruvikumari Sharma, Muhammad Ehsan, Abdulqadir J Nashwan","doi":"10.1002/npr2.12485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a mental health disorder resulting from exposure to traumatic events, manifesting in various debilitating symptoms. Despite available treatments, many individuals experience inadequate response or significant side effects. Previous reviews suggest promising outcomes with MDMA-assisted psychotherapy (MDMA-AT), but limitations prompt the need for a comprehensive evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched various online databases and registries such as MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov to retrieve RCTs that fit our inclusion criteria. We performed meta-analyses using Review Manager by applying a random-effects model. Dichotomous and continuous outcomes were pooled as risk ratios (RR) and standard mean difference (SMD), respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies with a total of 297 participants with PTSD were included in our meta-analysis. The control group consisted of inactive doses of MDMA (25-40 mg) or placebo. Our meta-analysis showed that MDMA-AT led to a significant reduction in the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) severity scores as compared to the control group (SMD -1.10, 95% CI: -1.62 to -0.59). More patients in the MDMA-AT group exhibited significant response (RR 1.59, 95% CI: 1.22, 2.08) and remission (RR 2.32, 95% CI: 1.47 to 3.66) as compared to patients in the control group. There was no significant difference regarding the incidence of ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE), ≥1 severe TEAE, and suicidal ideation between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MDMA-AT demonstrates significant efficacy in improving PTSD symptoms, enhancing both response and remission rates in individuals with chronic, treatment-resistant PTSD, while maintaining a favorable safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":19137,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychopharmacology Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for the treatment of PTSD: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).\",\"authors\":\"Ghada Shahrour, Kainat Sohail, Safa Elrais, Muhammad Hamza Khan, Javeria Javeid, Khubaib Samdani, Hajra Mansoor, Syed Izhar Hussain, Dhruvikumari Sharma, Muhammad Ehsan, Abdulqadir J Nashwan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/npr2.12485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a mental health disorder resulting from exposure to traumatic events, manifesting in various debilitating symptoms. Despite available treatments, many individuals experience inadequate response or significant side effects. Previous reviews suggest promising outcomes with MDMA-assisted psychotherapy (MDMA-AT), but limitations prompt the need for a comprehensive evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched various online databases and registries such as MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov to retrieve RCTs that fit our inclusion criteria. We performed meta-analyses using Review Manager by applying a random-effects model. Dichotomous and continuous outcomes were pooled as risk ratios (RR) and standard mean difference (SMD), respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies with a total of 297 participants with PTSD were included in our meta-analysis. The control group consisted of inactive doses of MDMA (25-40 mg) or placebo. Our meta-analysis showed that MDMA-AT led to a significant reduction in the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) severity scores as compared to the control group (SMD -1.10, 95% CI: -1.62 to -0.59). More patients in the MDMA-AT group exhibited significant response (RR 1.59, 95% CI: 1.22, 2.08) and remission (RR 2.32, 95% CI: 1.47 to 3.66) as compared to patients in the control group. There was no significant difference regarding the incidence of ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE), ≥1 severe TEAE, and suicidal ideation between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MDMA-AT demonstrates significant efficacy in improving PTSD symptoms, enhancing both response and remission rates in individuals with chronic, treatment-resistant PTSD, while maintaining a favorable safety profile.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuropsychopharmacology Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuropsychopharmacology Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/npr2.12485\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychopharmacology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/npr2.12485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:创伤后应激障碍(PTSD创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)是一种因遭受创伤事件而导致的精神疾病,表现为各种使人衰弱的症状。尽管有可用的治疗方法,但许多人的反应不足或副作用明显。以往的综述表明,使用亚甲二氧基甲基苯丙胺辅助心理疗法(MDMA-AT)可取得良好疗效,但其局限性促使我们需要进行全面评估:我们搜索了各种在线数据库和登记册,如 MEDLINE(通过 PubMed)、Embase、Cochrane 对照试验中央登记册 (CENTRAL) 和 ClinicalTrials.gov,以检索符合纳入标准的 RCT。我们采用随机效应模型,使用 "综述管理器 "进行了荟萃分析。二分结果和连续结果分别以风险比(RR)和标准平均差(SMD)的形式进行汇总:我们的荟萃分析共纳入了九项研究,共有 297 名创伤后应激障碍患者参与。对照组包括非活性剂量的亚甲二氧基甲基苯丙胺(25-40 毫克)或安慰剂。我们的荟萃分析表明,与对照组相比,MDMA-AT 可显著降低 DSM-5 临床医师注册创伤后应激障碍量表(CAPS-5)的严重程度评分(SMD -1.10,95% CI:-1.62 至 -0.59)。与对照组患者相比,MDMA-AT 组有更多患者表现出明显的反应(RR 1.59,95% CI:1.22, 2.08)和缓解(RR 2.32,95% CI:1.47, 3.66)。两组患者的治疗突发不良事件(TEAE)≥1次、严重TEAE≥1次和自杀意念发生率无明显差异:MDMA-AT在改善创伤后应激障碍症状方面疗效显著,提高了慢性、耐药性创伤后应激障碍患者的应答率和缓解率,同时保持了良好的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MDMA-assisted psychotherapy for the treatment of PTSD: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Background: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a mental health disorder resulting from exposure to traumatic events, manifesting in various debilitating symptoms. Despite available treatments, many individuals experience inadequate response or significant side effects. Previous reviews suggest promising outcomes with MDMA-assisted psychotherapy (MDMA-AT), but limitations prompt the need for a comprehensive evaluation.

Methods: We searched various online databases and registries such as MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov to retrieve RCTs that fit our inclusion criteria. We performed meta-analyses using Review Manager by applying a random-effects model. Dichotomous and continuous outcomes were pooled as risk ratios (RR) and standard mean difference (SMD), respectively.

Results: Nine studies with a total of 297 participants with PTSD were included in our meta-analysis. The control group consisted of inactive doses of MDMA (25-40 mg) or placebo. Our meta-analysis showed that MDMA-AT led to a significant reduction in the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) severity scores as compared to the control group (SMD -1.10, 95% CI: -1.62 to -0.59). More patients in the MDMA-AT group exhibited significant response (RR 1.59, 95% CI: 1.22, 2.08) and remission (RR 2.32, 95% CI: 1.47 to 3.66) as compared to patients in the control group. There was no significant difference regarding the incidence of ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE), ≥1 severe TEAE, and suicidal ideation between the two groups.

Conclusion: MDMA-AT demonstrates significant efficacy in improving PTSD symptoms, enhancing both response and remission rates in individuals with chronic, treatment-resistant PTSD, while maintaining a favorable safety profile.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychopharmacology Reports
Neuropsychopharmacology Reports Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Fluoxetine does not influence response to continuous theta burst stimulation in human motor cortex. The association between benzodiazepine prescriptions and the risk of laxative use in schizophrenia treatment. Effects of frequently prescribed antiseizure medications on motor vehicle driving performance: Narrative review based on a tiered approach for the assessment of clinically meaningful driving impairment in the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare guideline. Successful treatment with olanzapine and aripiprazole of a schizophrenic patient who developed priapism after switching from risperidone to paliperidone. Investigation of risk factors associated with the development of depressive symptoms in healthy subjects exposed to long-term stress: A prospective study of the Japanese Antarctic research expedition wintering party.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1