对患有严重精神疾病的成年人实施数字干预以促进戒烟的效果和经验:系统回顾与荟萃分析。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Nicotine & Tobacco Research Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntae237
Lisa Huddlestone, Emily Shoesmith, Jodi Pervin, Rosie Stevens, Simon Gilbody, Elena Ratschen
{"title":"对患有严重精神疾病的成年人实施数字干预以促进戒烟的效果和经验:系统回顾与荟萃分析。","authors":"Lisa Huddlestone, Emily Shoesmith, Jodi Pervin, Rosie Stevens, Simon Gilbody, Elena Ratschen","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Digital technology is increasingly used to support interventions targeting smoking cessation in people with severe mental illness (SMI). However, little is known about their implementation and effectiveness in this population. We aimed to determine their effectiveness, stakeholder experiences, factors influencing implementation, and quality of reporting of digital interventions for smoking cessation in adults living with SMI.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Five online bibliographic databases were searched for articles published between 31 December 2000 and 31 January 2023. Studies involving adults accessing treatment for alcohol and substance use disorders, neurocognitive disorders and terminal illnesses were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). A Mantel-Haenszel random-effects meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted. Participant experience and intervention implementation were explored using a narrative synthesis. Quality of reporting of interventions was assessed using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one studies enrolling 3,794 participants were included. Meta-analysis of biochemically verified abstinence at longest follow-up (month-1 to month-6) did not find an overall effect in favour of intervention [risk ratio (RR) = 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.005 - 1.37]. Interventions tailored to people with SMI were perceived as acceptable. Implementation strategies concentrated on overcoming practical challenges at the participant/user level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No evidence of the effectiveness of digital interventions to support smoking cessation in people with SMI was found. The importance of tailoring interventions to the needs of people with SMI is highlighted. Robust reporting of implementation is required to enhance future efforts to support smoking cessation in adults with SMI.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The findings of this review add to the emerging evidence on digital interventions to support smoking cessation among people with SMI. We highlight the importance of tailoring interventions to the population, particularly considering the role of mental illness and the side effects of psychotropic medication in the accessibility and usability of digital interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness and experience of implementing digital interventions to promote smoking cessation among adults with severe mental illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Huddlestone, Emily Shoesmith, Jodi Pervin, Rosie Stevens, Simon Gilbody, Elena Ratschen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ntr/ntae237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Digital technology is increasingly used to support interventions targeting smoking cessation in people with severe mental illness (SMI). However, little is known about their implementation and effectiveness in this population. We aimed to determine their effectiveness, stakeholder experiences, factors influencing implementation, and quality of reporting of digital interventions for smoking cessation in adults living with SMI.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Five online bibliographic databases were searched for articles published between 31 December 2000 and 31 January 2023. Studies involving adults accessing treatment for alcohol and substance use disorders, neurocognitive disorders and terminal illnesses were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). A Mantel-Haenszel random-effects meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted. Participant experience and intervention implementation were explored using a narrative synthesis. Quality of reporting of interventions was assessed using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one studies enrolling 3,794 participants were included. Meta-analysis of biochemically verified abstinence at longest follow-up (month-1 to month-6) did not find an overall effect in favour of intervention [risk ratio (RR) = 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.005 - 1.37]. Interventions tailored to people with SMI were perceived as acceptable. Implementation strategies concentrated on overcoming practical challenges at the participant/user level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No evidence of the effectiveness of digital interventions to support smoking cessation in people with SMI was found. The importance of tailoring interventions to the needs of people with SMI is highlighted. Robust reporting of implementation is required to enhance future efforts to support smoking cessation in adults with SMI.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The findings of this review add to the emerging evidence on digital interventions to support smoking cessation among people with SMI. We highlight the importance of tailoring interventions to the population, particularly considering the role of mental illness and the side effects of psychotropic medication in the accessibility and usability of digital interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae237\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae237","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:数字技术越来越多地被用于支持针对严重精神疾病(SMI)患者的戒烟干预。然而,人们对其在这一人群中的实施情况和效果知之甚少。我们旨在确定其有效性、利益相关者的经验、影响实施的因素,以及针对成年 SMI 患者的戒烟数字干预措施的报告质量:我们在五个在线文献数据库中检索了 2000 年 12 月 31 日至 2023 年 1 月 31 日期间发表的文章。排除了涉及成人酒精和药物使用障碍、神经认知障碍和绝症治疗的研究。采用混合方法评估工具(MMAT)对偏倚风险进行了评估。对随机对照试验(RCT)进行了曼特尔-海恩泽尔随机效应荟萃分析。采用叙事综合法探讨了参与者的经验和干预措施的实施情况。采用干预措施描述和复制模板(TIDieR)核对表对干预措施的报告质量进行了评估:结果:共纳入 31 项研究,有 3,794 人参与。对最长随访时间(第1个月至第6个月)内经生化验证的戒断情况进行的元分析未发现干预措施的总体效果[风险比 (RR) = 0.66, 95% 置信区间 (CI) = -0.005 - 1.37]。针对 SMI 患者的干预被认为是可以接受的。实施策略集中于克服参与者/用户层面的实际挑战:没有证据表明数字干预对支持SMI患者戒烟有效。强调了根据 SMI 患者的需求定制干预措施的重要性。需要对实施情况进行有力的报告,以加强未来支持SMI成人戒烟的工作:本综述的研究结果为支持SMI患者戒烟的数字化干预措施提供了新的证据。我们强调了根据人群调整干预措施的重要性,特别是考虑到精神疾病和精神药物副作用对数字干预措施的可及性和可用性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness and experience of implementing digital interventions to promote smoking cessation among adults with severe mental illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Digital technology is increasingly used to support interventions targeting smoking cessation in people with severe mental illness (SMI). However, little is known about their implementation and effectiveness in this population. We aimed to determine their effectiveness, stakeholder experiences, factors influencing implementation, and quality of reporting of digital interventions for smoking cessation in adults living with SMI.

Method: Five online bibliographic databases were searched for articles published between 31 December 2000 and 31 January 2023. Studies involving adults accessing treatment for alcohol and substance use disorders, neurocognitive disorders and terminal illnesses were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). A Mantel-Haenszel random-effects meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted. Participant experience and intervention implementation were explored using a narrative synthesis. Quality of reporting of interventions was assessed using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist.

Results: Thirty-one studies enrolling 3,794 participants were included. Meta-analysis of biochemically verified abstinence at longest follow-up (month-1 to month-6) did not find an overall effect in favour of intervention [risk ratio (RR) = 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.005 - 1.37]. Interventions tailored to people with SMI were perceived as acceptable. Implementation strategies concentrated on overcoming practical challenges at the participant/user level.

Conclusion: No evidence of the effectiveness of digital interventions to support smoking cessation in people with SMI was found. The importance of tailoring interventions to the needs of people with SMI is highlighted. Robust reporting of implementation is required to enhance future efforts to support smoking cessation in adults with SMI.

Implications: The findings of this review add to the emerging evidence on digital interventions to support smoking cessation among people with SMI. We highlight the importance of tailoring interventions to the population, particularly considering the role of mental illness and the side effects of psychotropic medication in the accessibility and usability of digital interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
期刊最新文献
Analyzing the Diversity and Impacting Factors of Smoke-Free Legislation and Implementation in Mainland China: A Case Qualitative Research. Structural stigma and inequities in tobacco use among sexual and gender minoritized people: Accounting for context and intersectionality. Tobacco industry-backed third parties sow confusion and doubt amongst the public health community. AI for Tobacco Control: Identifying Tobacco-promoting Social Media Content Using Large Language Models. Examining the relationship between racial, ethnic and economic residential segregation and cigarette smoking among a nationally representative sample of young adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1