早期生活压力患者的抑郁症治疗。

4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Psychiatria Danubina Pub Date : 2024-09-01
Joel Cols Beraha, Mario F Juruena
{"title":"早期生活压力患者的抑郁症治疗。","authors":"Joel Cols Beraha, Mario F Juruena","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) are far more likely to suffer from Early Life Stress (ELS) than the average population. This typically increases severity of symptoms, and often leads to treatment resistance. This study set out to examine which treatments work best to treat depression in patients who have suffered from ELS, as well as possible interactions between ELS and antidepressant effects in therapies.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A literature review was conducted in July 2020 using the databases Embase, PsychInfo, and MEDLINE. The search looked for clinical trials treating MDD with psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies with patients who suffered from ELS. Data regarding demographics, comorbidities, measurement tools, and outcomes (generally response rates and remission) were extracted. The data was compared according to treatment types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) had the best evidence for treating MDD in people with ELS. There was some mixed evidence for Interpersonal Therapy, SSRIs, and SNRIs as suitable treatments for MDD. There was also very promising but limited evidence for Cognitive Behavioural Analysis of System Therapy and combination treatments (pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy together). Nefazodone (a SARI) had the weakest evidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CBT was the most effective treatment for MDD with ELS. However, more research needs to be conducted to ascertain a proper hierarchy of treatments, particularly with combination treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":20760,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatria Danubina","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment for Depression in Patients Who Have Suffered from Early Life Stress.\",\"authors\":\"Joel Cols Beraha, Mario F Juruena\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) are far more likely to suffer from Early Life Stress (ELS) than the average population. This typically increases severity of symptoms, and often leads to treatment resistance. This study set out to examine which treatments work best to treat depression in patients who have suffered from ELS, as well as possible interactions between ELS and antidepressant effects in therapies.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A literature review was conducted in July 2020 using the databases Embase, PsychInfo, and MEDLINE. The search looked for clinical trials treating MDD with psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies with patients who suffered from ELS. Data regarding demographics, comorbidities, measurement tools, and outcomes (generally response rates and remission) were extracted. The data was compared according to treatment types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) had the best evidence for treating MDD in people with ELS. There was some mixed evidence for Interpersonal Therapy, SSRIs, and SNRIs as suitable treatments for MDD. There was also very promising but limited evidence for Cognitive Behavioural Analysis of System Therapy and combination treatments (pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy together). Nefazodone (a SARI) had the weakest evidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CBT was the most effective treatment for MDD with ELS. However, more research needs to be conducted to ascertain a proper hierarchy of treatments, particularly with combination treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatria Danubina\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatria Danubina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatria Danubina","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:重度抑郁症(MDD)患者遭受早期生活压力(ELS)的可能性远高于普通人群。这通常会增加症状的严重程度,并常常导致治疗阻力。本研究旨在探讨哪种治疗方法对曾遭受 ELS 的患者的抑郁症治疗效果最佳,以及 ELS 与疗法中抗抑郁效果之间可能存在的相互作用:2020 年 7 月,我们使用 Embase、PsychInfo 和 MEDLINE 数据库进行了文献综述。检索内容包括使用心理疗法和药物疗法治疗 MDD 的临床试验,以及患有 ELS 的患者。提取了有关人口统计学、合并症、测量工具和结果(一般为反应率和缓解率)的数据。根据治疗类型对数据进行了比较:认知行为疗法(CBT)是治疗ELS患者MDD的最佳疗法。人际关系疗法、SSRIs 和 SNRIs 适合治疗 MDD,但证据不一。认知行为分析系统疗法和综合疗法(药物疗法和心理疗法相结合)也很有前景,但证据有限。奈法佐酮(SARI)的证据最薄弱:CBT是治疗伴有ELS的MDD最有效的方法。然而,还需要开展更多的研究,以确定治疗方法的适当等级,尤其是联合治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Treatment for Depression in Patients Who Have Suffered from Early Life Stress.

Background: People with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) are far more likely to suffer from Early Life Stress (ELS) than the average population. This typically increases severity of symptoms, and often leads to treatment resistance. This study set out to examine which treatments work best to treat depression in patients who have suffered from ELS, as well as possible interactions between ELS and antidepressant effects in therapies.

Method: A literature review was conducted in July 2020 using the databases Embase, PsychInfo, and MEDLINE. The search looked for clinical trials treating MDD with psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies with patients who suffered from ELS. Data regarding demographics, comorbidities, measurement tools, and outcomes (generally response rates and remission) were extracted. The data was compared according to treatment types.

Results: Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) had the best evidence for treating MDD in people with ELS. There was some mixed evidence for Interpersonal Therapy, SSRIs, and SNRIs as suitable treatments for MDD. There was also very promising but limited evidence for Cognitive Behavioural Analysis of System Therapy and combination treatments (pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy together). Nefazodone (a SARI) had the weakest evidence.

Conclusions: CBT was the most effective treatment for MDD with ELS. However, more research needs to be conducted to ascertain a proper hierarchy of treatments, particularly with combination treatments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatria Danubina
Psychiatria Danubina 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
288
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatria Danubina is a peer-reviewed open access journal of the Psychiatric Danubian Association, aimed to publish original scientific contributions in psychiatry, psychological medicine and related science (neurosciences, biological, psychological, and social sciences as well as philosophy of science and medical ethics, history, organization and economics of mental health services).
期刊最新文献
"New" Psychiatric Emergencies Between Hospital and Territory. Survey Results on the Innovative Protocol Between the Emergency Department and Mental Health Center in Trento. A Psychological Service Dedicated to Work-Related Stress: the Experience at Perugia General Hospital. Air Pollution and Symptom Severity in Hospitalized Subjects with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders. Animal-Assisted Intervention (AAI) in a Recovery-Oriented Psychiatric Rehabilitation Program. Application of Pharmacogenetics in the Personalized Treatment of a Patient with Hypochondriasis: Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1