Thomas Druetz, Sara Brenes-Garita, Frank Bicaba, Cheick Tiendrebeogo, Abel Bicaba
{"title":"COVID-19 及其对粮食生产者的影响:来自布基纳法索的面板数据证据。","authors":"Thomas Druetz, Sara Brenes-Garita, Frank Bicaba, Cheick Tiendrebeogo, Abel Bicaba","doi":"10.1186/s40795-024-00942-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Burkina Faso implemented stringent measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic that profoundly affected its economy and might have exacerbated food insecurity. While prior studies have assessed the impact of these measures on consumers, there is a dearth of evidence of its effects on food producers in Sub-Saharan Africa. This study aims (i) to evaluate the repercussions of COVID-19 on the possession of food production assets and on the number of livestock owned; and (ii) to determine the correlation between the food insecurity experience scale (FIES) score, ownership of these assets, and the number of livestock owned.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employs a pre-post comparison design in two panels of randomly selected households in Burkina Faso. While Panel A was constituted of 384 households predominantly (76%) living in rural areas, Panel B comprised 504 households, only half of which (51%) lived in rural areas. All households were visited twice: in July 2019 and February 2021, for Panel A, and in February 2020 and February 2021, for Panel B. Panel B was added to the study before the pandemic thanks to additional funding; the timing of the survey was harmonized in both panels for the second round. Regression models were used with fixed effects at the household level, controlling for potential time-invariant confounding variables, and correlation coefficients between possession of production assets or number of livestock and FIES score were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings indicate that the possession of some assets in Panel A (cart, livestock, bicycle, watch) was significantly reduced during the pandemic, as was the herd sizes among livestock-owning households in both panels. Households with fewer production assets and number of livestock were more likely to experience food insecurity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the vulnerability of rural households in Burkina Faso to the economic disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Addressing the challenges faced by farming and livestock-owning households is crucial for mitigating food insecurity and improving resilience in the face of ongoing crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":36422,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nutrition","volume":"10 1","pages":"132"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11462756/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 and its effects on food producers: panel data evidence from Burkina Faso.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Druetz, Sara Brenes-Garita, Frank Bicaba, Cheick Tiendrebeogo, Abel Bicaba\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40795-024-00942-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Burkina Faso implemented stringent measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic that profoundly affected its economy and might have exacerbated food insecurity. While prior studies have assessed the impact of these measures on consumers, there is a dearth of evidence of its effects on food producers in Sub-Saharan Africa. This study aims (i) to evaluate the repercussions of COVID-19 on the possession of food production assets and on the number of livestock owned; and (ii) to determine the correlation between the food insecurity experience scale (FIES) score, ownership of these assets, and the number of livestock owned.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employs a pre-post comparison design in two panels of randomly selected households in Burkina Faso. While Panel A was constituted of 384 households predominantly (76%) living in rural areas, Panel B comprised 504 households, only half of which (51%) lived in rural areas. All households were visited twice: in July 2019 and February 2021, for Panel A, and in February 2020 and February 2021, for Panel B. Panel B was added to the study before the pandemic thanks to additional funding; the timing of the survey was harmonized in both panels for the second round. Regression models were used with fixed effects at the household level, controlling for potential time-invariant confounding variables, and correlation coefficients between possession of production assets or number of livestock and FIES score were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings indicate that the possession of some assets in Panel A (cart, livestock, bicycle, watch) was significantly reduced during the pandemic, as was the herd sizes among livestock-owning households in both panels. Households with fewer production assets and number of livestock were more likely to experience food insecurity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the vulnerability of rural households in Burkina Faso to the economic disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Addressing the challenges faced by farming and livestock-owning households is crucial for mitigating food insecurity and improving resilience in the face of ongoing crises.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11462756/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-024-00942-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-024-00942-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:布基纳法索针对 COVID-19 大流行病实施了严厉的应对措施,这些措施对其经济产生了深远影响,并可能加剧粮食不安全状况。以往的研究评估了这些措施对消费者的影响,但缺乏证据表明这些措施对撒哈拉以南非洲的粮食生产者产生了影响。本研究旨在:(i) 评估 COVID-19 对粮食生产资产拥有量和牲畜拥有量的影响;(ii) 确定粮食不安全体验量表 (FIES) 评分、这些资产拥有量和牲畜拥有量之间的相关性:本研究在布基纳法索随机抽取的两组家庭中采用了前后比较设计。小组 A 由 384 户家庭组成,主要(76%)居住在农村地区;小组 B 由 504 户家庭组成,其中只有一半(51%)居住在农村地区。由于获得了额外的资金,B 小组在大流行之前就加入了研究;在第二轮调查中,两个小组的调查时间得到了统一。在家庭层面使用固定效应回归模型,控制潜在的时间不变混杂变量,并测量生产资产或牲畜数量与 FIES 分数之间的相关系数:我们的研究结果表明,在大流行期间,小组 A 中某些资产(手推车、牲畜、自行车、手表)的拥有量显著减少,两个小组中拥有牲畜的家庭的牲畜群数量也显著减少。生产资产和牲畜数量较少的家庭更有可能面临粮食不安全问题:这项研究强调了布基纳法索农村家庭在 COVID-19 大流行病造成的经济混乱面前的脆弱性。应对农业和畜牧业家庭面临的挑战对于减轻粮食不安全状况和提高面对持续危机的复原力至关重要。
COVID-19 and its effects on food producers: panel data evidence from Burkina Faso.
Introduction: Burkina Faso implemented stringent measures in response to the COVID-19 pandemic that profoundly affected its economy and might have exacerbated food insecurity. While prior studies have assessed the impact of these measures on consumers, there is a dearth of evidence of its effects on food producers in Sub-Saharan Africa. This study aims (i) to evaluate the repercussions of COVID-19 on the possession of food production assets and on the number of livestock owned; and (ii) to determine the correlation between the food insecurity experience scale (FIES) score, ownership of these assets, and the number of livestock owned.
Methods: This study employs a pre-post comparison design in two panels of randomly selected households in Burkina Faso. While Panel A was constituted of 384 households predominantly (76%) living in rural areas, Panel B comprised 504 households, only half of which (51%) lived in rural areas. All households were visited twice: in July 2019 and February 2021, for Panel A, and in February 2020 and February 2021, for Panel B. Panel B was added to the study before the pandemic thanks to additional funding; the timing of the survey was harmonized in both panels for the second round. Regression models were used with fixed effects at the household level, controlling for potential time-invariant confounding variables, and correlation coefficients between possession of production assets or number of livestock and FIES score were measured.
Results: Our findings indicate that the possession of some assets in Panel A (cart, livestock, bicycle, watch) was significantly reduced during the pandemic, as was the herd sizes among livestock-owning households in both panels. Households with fewer production assets and number of livestock were more likely to experience food insecurity.
Conclusion: This study underscores the vulnerability of rural households in Burkina Faso to the economic disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Addressing the challenges faced by farming and livestock-owning households is crucial for mitigating food insecurity and improving resilience in the face of ongoing crises.