比较 6 分钟步行测试、定时起立行走测试和跑步机心肺运动测试的生理反应。

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION Rehabilitation Research and Practice Pub Date : 2024-09-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/1317817
Eduardo S Alves, R Nicole Bellet, Pramod Sharma, Bryce N Balmain, Craig Aitken, Thomas Doering, Leilani Orola, Anita Green, Tatiana Paim, Fergus O'Connor, Norman R Morris
{"title":"比较 6 分钟步行测试、定时起立行走测试和跑步机心肺运动测试的生理反应。","authors":"Eduardo S Alves, R Nicole Bellet, Pramod Sharma, Bryce N Balmain, Craig Aitken, Thomas Doering, Leilani Orola, Anita Green, Tatiana Paim, Fergus O'Connor, Norman R Morris","doi":"10.1155/2024/1317817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To compare physiological responses during a treadmill cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPX), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and timed up and go test (TUGT) in individuals referred for unexplained breathlessness and symptom limited treadmill exercise testing. <b>Methods:</b> Heart rate (HR), oxygen consumption (V̇O<sub>2</sub>), carbon dioxide production (V̇CO<sub>2</sub>), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), minute ventilation (V̇<sub>E</sub>), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded throughout each test. <b>Results:</b> Each test demonstrated a significant increase (<i>p</i> < 0.01) in the cardiopulmonary (V̇O<sub>2</sub>, V̇CO<sub>2</sub> and V̇<sub>E</sub>, RPE, SBP, and HR) and perceptual (RPE) responses from rest to end exercise. The increase in cardiopulmonary and perceptual responses was greatest for the CPX with significantly smaller responses demonstrated during the 6MWT (<i>p</i> < 0.01) and even smaller responses for the TUGT (<i>p</i> < 0.01 vs CPX and 6MWT). <b>Conclusion:</b> Not surprisingly, the treadmill CPX results is the greatest physiological response in our group. Despite being of short duration, the TUGT results in an increased physiological response.</p>","PeriodicalId":45585,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11458269/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Physiological Responses to the 6-Minute Walk Test, Timed Up and Go Test, and Treadmill Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test.\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo S Alves, R Nicole Bellet, Pramod Sharma, Bryce N Balmain, Craig Aitken, Thomas Doering, Leilani Orola, Anita Green, Tatiana Paim, Fergus O'Connor, Norman R Morris\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/1317817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To compare physiological responses during a treadmill cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPX), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and timed up and go test (TUGT) in individuals referred for unexplained breathlessness and symptom limited treadmill exercise testing. <b>Methods:</b> Heart rate (HR), oxygen consumption (V̇O<sub>2</sub>), carbon dioxide production (V̇CO<sub>2</sub>), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), minute ventilation (V̇<sub>E</sub>), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded throughout each test. <b>Results:</b> Each test demonstrated a significant increase (<i>p</i> < 0.01) in the cardiopulmonary (V̇O<sub>2</sub>, V̇CO<sub>2</sub> and V̇<sub>E</sub>, RPE, SBP, and HR) and perceptual (RPE) responses from rest to end exercise. The increase in cardiopulmonary and perceptual responses was greatest for the CPX with significantly smaller responses demonstrated during the 6MWT (<i>p</i> < 0.01) and even smaller responses for the TUGT (<i>p</i> < 0.01 vs CPX and 6MWT). <b>Conclusion:</b> Not surprisingly, the treadmill CPX results is the greatest physiological response in our group. Despite being of short duration, the TUGT results in an increased physiological response.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rehabilitation Research and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11458269/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rehabilitation Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1317817\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1317817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较因不明原因的呼吸困难和症状受限的跑步机运动测试转诊者在跑步机心肺运动测试(CPX)、6 分钟步行测试(6MWT)和定时起跑测试(TUGT)期间的生理反应。方法:在每次测试过程中记录心率(HR)、耗氧量(VO2)、二氧化碳产生量(VCO2)、呼吸交换比(RER)、分钟通气量(VE)、收缩压(SBP)和感觉用力评分(RPE)。结果:从静止到运动结束,每项测试都显示心肺(V∠O2、V∠CO2 和 V∠E、RPE、SBP 和 HR)和知觉(RPE)反应明显增加(p < 0.01)。心肺和知觉反应的增加在 CPX 中最为明显,而在 6MWT 中的反应则明显较小(p < 0.01),在 TUGT 中的反应甚至更小(p < 0.01 与 CPX 和 6MWT 相比)。结论毫不奇怪,跑步机 CPX 结果是我们小组中最大的生理反应。尽管持续时间较短,但 TUGT 的生理反应却有所增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing the Physiological Responses to the 6-Minute Walk Test, Timed Up and Go Test, and Treadmill Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test.

Purpose: To compare physiological responses during a treadmill cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPX), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and timed up and go test (TUGT) in individuals referred for unexplained breathlessness and symptom limited treadmill exercise testing. Methods: Heart rate (HR), oxygen consumption (V̇O2), carbon dioxide production (V̇CO2), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), minute ventilation (V̇E), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded throughout each test. Results: Each test demonstrated a significant increase (p < 0.01) in the cardiopulmonary (V̇O2, V̇CO2 and V̇E, RPE, SBP, and HR) and perceptual (RPE) responses from rest to end exercise. The increase in cardiopulmonary and perceptual responses was greatest for the CPX with significantly smaller responses demonstrated during the 6MWT (p < 0.01) and even smaller responses for the TUGT (p < 0.01 vs CPX and 6MWT). Conclusion: Not surprisingly, the treadmill CPX results is the greatest physiological response in our group. Despite being of short duration, the TUGT results in an increased physiological response.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Rehabilitation Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of physical medicine and rehabilitation. The journal focuses on improving and restoring functional ability and quality of life to those with physical impairments or disabilities. In addition, articles looking at techniques to assess and study disabling conditions will be considered.
期刊最新文献
Physical Health and Socioeconomic Status in Ambulatory Adults With Bilateral Spastic Cerebral Palsy. Comparing the Physiological Responses to the 6-Minute Walk Test, Timed Up and Go Test, and Treadmill Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test. Virtual Reality Technology for Physical and Cognitive Function Rehabilitation in People With Multiple Sclerosis. Categories of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale Activities in Chronic Neck Pain and Their Relationship to the Neck Disability Index. The NewGait Rehabilitative Device Corrects Gait Deviations in Individuals With Foot Drop.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1