在 COVID-19 大流行期间,住院病人志愿者在床边和学院医生在 Zoom 上对医学实习学生的病史采集技能进行双重指导。

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S472324
Kush S Patel, Ronald J Anderson, Carolyn B Becker, William C Taylor, Anne F Liu, Anubodh S Varshney, Nadaa B Ali, Barbara J Nath, Stephen R Pelletier, Helen M Shields, Nora Y Osman
{"title":"在 COVID-19 大流行期间,住院病人志愿者在床边和学院医生在 Zoom 上对医学实习学生的病史采集技能进行双重指导。","authors":"Kush S Patel, Ronald J Anderson, Carolyn B Becker, William C Taylor, Anne F Liu, Anubodh S Varshney, Nadaa B Ali, Barbara J Nath, Stephen R Pelletier, Helen M Shields, Nora Y Osman","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S472324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Coaching is a well-described means of providing real-time, actionable feedback to learners. We aimed to determine whether dual coaching from faculty physicians and real inpatients led to an improvement in history-taking skills of clerkship medical students.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Expert faculty physicians (on Zoom) directly observed 13 clerkship medical students as they obtained a history from 26 real, hospitalized inpatients (in person), after which students received immediate feedback from both the physician and the patient. De-identified audio-video recordings of all interviews were scored by independent judges using a previously validated clinical rating tool to assess for improvement in history-taking skills between the two interviews. Finally, all participants completed a survey with Likert scale questions and free-text prompts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students' history-taking skills - specifically in the domains of communication, medical knowledge and professional conduct - on the validated rating tool, as evaluated by the independent judges, did not significantly improve between their first and second patient interviews. However, students rated the dual coaching as overwhelmingly positive (average score of 1.43, with 1 being Excellent and 5 being Poor), with many appreciating the specificity and timeliness of the feedback. Patients also rated the experience very highly (average score of 1.23, with 1 being Excellent and 5 being Poor), noting that they gained new insights into medical training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Students value receiving immediate and specific feedback and real patients enjoy participating in the feedback process. Dual physician-patient coaching is a unique way to incorporate more direct observation into undergraduate medical education curricula.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11460274/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dual Coaching of Medical Clerkship Students' History Taking Skills by Volunteer Inpatients at the Bedside and Faculty Physicians on Zoom During the COVID-19 Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Kush S Patel, Ronald J Anderson, Carolyn B Becker, William C Taylor, Anne F Liu, Anubodh S Varshney, Nadaa B Ali, Barbara J Nath, Stephen R Pelletier, Helen M Shields, Nora Y Osman\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/AMEP.S472324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Coaching is a well-described means of providing real-time, actionable feedback to learners. We aimed to determine whether dual coaching from faculty physicians and real inpatients led to an improvement in history-taking skills of clerkship medical students.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Expert faculty physicians (on Zoom) directly observed 13 clerkship medical students as they obtained a history from 26 real, hospitalized inpatients (in person), after which students received immediate feedback from both the physician and the patient. De-identified audio-video recordings of all interviews were scored by independent judges using a previously validated clinical rating tool to assess for improvement in history-taking skills between the two interviews. Finally, all participants completed a survey with Likert scale questions and free-text prompts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students' history-taking skills - specifically in the domains of communication, medical knowledge and professional conduct - on the validated rating tool, as evaluated by the independent judges, did not significantly improve between their first and second patient interviews. However, students rated the dual coaching as overwhelmingly positive (average score of 1.43, with 1 being Excellent and 5 being Poor), with many appreciating the specificity and timeliness of the feedback. Patients also rated the experience very highly (average score of 1.23, with 1 being Excellent and 5 being Poor), noting that they gained new insights into medical training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Students value receiving immediate and specific feedback and real patients enjoy participating in the feedback process. Dual physician-patient coaching is a unique way to incorporate more direct observation into undergraduate medical education curricula.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11460274/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S472324\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S472324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:辅导是一种为学习者提供实时、可操作反馈的有效方法。我们旨在确定来自教师和真实住院病人的双重辅导是否能提高实习医学生的病史采集技能:专家教师(通过 Zoom)直接观察 13 名实习医学生从 26 名真实住院病人(本人)处获取病史的过程,之后学生从医生和病人处获得即时反馈。所有访谈的去身份化音频视频记录都由独立评委使用先前验证过的临床评分工具进行评分,以评估两次访谈之间病史采集技能的改进情况。最后,所有参与者都填写了一份包含李克特量表问题和自由文本提示的调查问卷:结果:根据独立评委的评估,学生的病史采集技能--特别是在沟通、医学知识和职业操守方面--在经过验证的评分工具上,在第一次和第二次病人访谈之间并没有明显改善。不过,学生们对双重辅导的评价非常正面(平均分为 1.43 分,1 分为 "优",5 分为 "差"),许多学生对反馈的具体性和及时性表示赞赏。患者也给予了高度评价(平均分为 1.23 分,其中 1 分为 "优",5 分为 "差"),指出他们对医学培训有了新的认识:结论:学生们非常重视获得及时而具体的反馈,而真正的患者也乐于参与反馈过程。医患双导师制是将更多直接观察纳入本科医学教育课程的一种独特方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dual Coaching of Medical Clerkship Students' History Taking Skills by Volunteer Inpatients at the Bedside and Faculty Physicians on Zoom During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Purpose: Coaching is a well-described means of providing real-time, actionable feedback to learners. We aimed to determine whether dual coaching from faculty physicians and real inpatients led to an improvement in history-taking skills of clerkship medical students.

Patients and methods: Expert faculty physicians (on Zoom) directly observed 13 clerkship medical students as they obtained a history from 26 real, hospitalized inpatients (in person), after which students received immediate feedback from both the physician and the patient. De-identified audio-video recordings of all interviews were scored by independent judges using a previously validated clinical rating tool to assess for improvement in history-taking skills between the two interviews. Finally, all participants completed a survey with Likert scale questions and free-text prompts.

Results: Students' history-taking skills - specifically in the domains of communication, medical knowledge and professional conduct - on the validated rating tool, as evaluated by the independent judges, did not significantly improve between their first and second patient interviews. However, students rated the dual coaching as overwhelmingly positive (average score of 1.43, with 1 being Excellent and 5 being Poor), with many appreciating the specificity and timeliness of the feedback. Patients also rated the experience very highly (average score of 1.23, with 1 being Excellent and 5 being Poor), noting that they gained new insights into medical training.

Conclusion: Students value receiving immediate and specific feedback and real patients enjoy participating in the feedback process. Dual physician-patient coaching is a unique way to incorporate more direct observation into undergraduate medical education curricula.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Interprofessional Education Readiness and Perceptions Among Health Professions Students [Letter]. Variations in Trauma Education Practices Across Emergency Medicine Residencies: Insights from a National Survey of Program Directors. Medical Healthcare Student's Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices Regarding Hand Hygiene and Its Relation to Patient Safety - A Global Scoping Review. Collaborative Teaching and Curricular Integration in Pre-Intern Clinical Placements: Insights from the Greater Bay Area. Dual Coaching of Medical Clerkship Students' History-Taking Skills by Volunteer Inpatients at the Bedside and Faculty Physicians on Zoom during the COVID-19 Pandemic [Letter].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1