D.S. Al-Mousa , M. Alakhras , A.G. AlSa'di , M. Chau , C. Hayre , A.M. Mahasneh
{"title":"约旦牙科放射摄影从业人员对辐射防护的态度和做法。","authors":"D.S. Al-Mousa , M. Alakhras , A.G. AlSa'di , M. Chau , C. Hayre , A.M. Mahasneh","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2024.09.061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Varying radiation protection practices have been documented in the literature. This study aims to evaluate the attitudes and practices of dental radiography practitioners towards radiation protection in Jordan, as no data currently explores their understanding and practices in this area.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The survey involved 192 dental radiography practitioners. A cross-sectional, self-administered questionnaire containing 43 questions covered socio-demographic data, practices towards radiation protection, and attitudes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The majority of participants were less than 40 years old (87.5 %), with 66.7 % working in private clinics and 53.6 % based in the capital city of Jordan. Nearly a quarter (26.5 %) of the practitioners used an X-ray tube voltage of 65–70 kVp; however, 14.6 % were unaware of the X-ray tube voltage used in their machines. Additionally, almost one quarter of the participants never or rarely used light beam positioning aids and available positioning guides in panoramic radiography practice. Only 33.3 % of practitioners consistently used lead aprons, with the main reasons for non-use being the weight of the apron or its unavailability. About 81 % of participants believed in spreading awareness about radiation protection and applying this knowledge in their daily practices.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The study found that the practitioners' practices were satisfactory to some extent, supported by a positive attitude towards radiation protection. The participants understand the importance of increasing their awareness and knowledge of radiation protection practices.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>The findings of this study highlight the need to improve radiation protection practices among dental radiography practitioners in Jordan by introducing standard dose protocols, supporting the transition to digital systems, establishing diagnostic reference levels, and encouraging the use of equipment over staff holding practices, and raising awareness about radiation safety.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"30 6","pages":"Pages 1556-1562"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attitudes and practices of radiation protection among Jordanian dental radiography practitioners\",\"authors\":\"D.S. Al-Mousa , M. Alakhras , A.G. AlSa'di , M. Chau , C. Hayre , A.M. Mahasneh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radi.2024.09.061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Varying radiation protection practices have been documented in the literature. This study aims to evaluate the attitudes and practices of dental radiography practitioners towards radiation protection in Jordan, as no data currently explores their understanding and practices in this area.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The survey involved 192 dental radiography practitioners. A cross-sectional, self-administered questionnaire containing 43 questions covered socio-demographic data, practices towards radiation protection, and attitudes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The majority of participants were less than 40 years old (87.5 %), with 66.7 % working in private clinics and 53.6 % based in the capital city of Jordan. Nearly a quarter (26.5 %) of the practitioners used an X-ray tube voltage of 65–70 kVp; however, 14.6 % were unaware of the X-ray tube voltage used in their machines. Additionally, almost one quarter of the participants never or rarely used light beam positioning aids and available positioning guides in panoramic radiography practice. Only 33.3 % of practitioners consistently used lead aprons, with the main reasons for non-use being the weight of the apron or its unavailability. About 81 % of participants believed in spreading awareness about radiation protection and applying this knowledge in their daily practices.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The study found that the practitioners' practices were satisfactory to some extent, supported by a positive attitude towards radiation protection. The participants understand the importance of increasing their awareness and knowledge of radiation protection practices.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for practice</h3><div>The findings of this study highlight the need to improve radiation protection practices among dental radiography practitioners in Jordan by introducing standard dose protocols, supporting the transition to digital systems, establishing diagnostic reference levels, and encouraging the use of equipment over staff holding practices, and raising awareness about radiation safety.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiography\",\"volume\":\"30 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1556-1562\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817424002906\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1078817424002906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Attitudes and practices of radiation protection among Jordanian dental radiography practitioners
Introduction
Varying radiation protection practices have been documented in the literature. This study aims to evaluate the attitudes and practices of dental radiography practitioners towards radiation protection in Jordan, as no data currently explores their understanding and practices in this area.
Methods
The survey involved 192 dental radiography practitioners. A cross-sectional, self-administered questionnaire containing 43 questions covered socio-demographic data, practices towards radiation protection, and attitudes.
Results
The majority of participants were less than 40 years old (87.5 %), with 66.7 % working in private clinics and 53.6 % based in the capital city of Jordan. Nearly a quarter (26.5 %) of the practitioners used an X-ray tube voltage of 65–70 kVp; however, 14.6 % were unaware of the X-ray tube voltage used in their machines. Additionally, almost one quarter of the participants never or rarely used light beam positioning aids and available positioning guides in panoramic radiography practice. Only 33.3 % of practitioners consistently used lead aprons, with the main reasons for non-use being the weight of the apron or its unavailability. About 81 % of participants believed in spreading awareness about radiation protection and applying this knowledge in their daily practices.
Conclusions
The study found that the practitioners' practices were satisfactory to some extent, supported by a positive attitude towards radiation protection. The participants understand the importance of increasing their awareness and knowledge of radiation protection practices.
Implications for practice
The findings of this study highlight the need to improve radiation protection practices among dental radiography practitioners in Jordan by introducing standard dose protocols, supporting the transition to digital systems, establishing diagnostic reference levels, and encouraging the use of equipment over staff holding practices, and raising awareness about radiation safety.
RadiographyRADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍:
Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.