医护合作移除导尿管方案对泌尿科患者尿路感染发生率的影响:一项回顾性研究

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Archivos Espanoles De Urologia Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20247708.126
Weihong Wan, Dan Hu, Zhimin Xiong, Li Zhang
{"title":"医护合作移除导尿管方案对泌尿科患者尿路感染发生率的影响:一项回顾性研究","authors":"Weihong Wan, Dan Hu, Zhimin Xiong, Li Zhang","doi":"10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20247708.126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Urology patients are often placed with a catheter following surgery. Hence, a high-quality and appropriate management and removal programme can considerably reduce catheter-associated complications such as urinary tract infections and improve patient comfort. This retrospective study investigated the impact of a collaborative medical-nursing catheter removal protocol on reducing the incidence of urinary tract infections in urological surgery patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent partial nephrectomy at our hospital between January 2021 and December 2022 were enrolled and allocated to a control and an observation group based on the method of urinary catheter removal. A physician was solely responsible for monitoring, evaluating, and removing the catheter in the control group, whereas a physician and nurses performed these catheter management activities in the observation group. The two groups were compared in terms of urinary tract infections, urinary tract irritation and hematuria signs, pain levels, and catheter retention time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 178 patients were included, among which 88 were divided into the control group and 90 into the observation group according to their corresponding urinary catheter removal method entered into the medical records system. The general characteristics of the two groups were similar (<i>p</i> > 0.05). However, the rates of urinary tract infections and urinary tract irritation and hematuria signs in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (1.11% vs. 9.09%, χ<sup>2</sup> = 5.902, <i>p</i> = 0.037; 5.55% vs. 15.91%, χ<sup>2</sup> = 4.159, <i>p</i> = 0.041, respectively). The observation group also exhibited lower levels of urinary pain within 1 h post-catheter removal and shorter total catheter retention time than the control group (t = 2.497, <i>p</i> = 0.013; t = 2.316, <i>p</i> = 0.022, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Collaborative medical-nursing catheter removal protocols for patients undergoing partial nephrectomy may effectively alleviate urinary pain, decrease the incidence of urinary tract infections and irritation and hematuria signs, and shorten catheter retention time, underscoring the clinical significance of its implementation in this specific population.</p>","PeriodicalId":48852,"journal":{"name":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","volume":"77 8","pages":"897-902"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of a Collaborative Medical-Nursing Catheter Removal Protocol on Incidence of Urinary Tract Infections in Urology Patients: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Weihong Wan, Dan Hu, Zhimin Xiong, Li Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20247708.126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Urology patients are often placed with a catheter following surgery. Hence, a high-quality and appropriate management and removal programme can considerably reduce catheter-associated complications such as urinary tract infections and improve patient comfort. This retrospective study investigated the impact of a collaborative medical-nursing catheter removal protocol on reducing the incidence of urinary tract infections in urological surgery patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent partial nephrectomy at our hospital between January 2021 and December 2022 were enrolled and allocated to a control and an observation group based on the method of urinary catheter removal. A physician was solely responsible for monitoring, evaluating, and removing the catheter in the control group, whereas a physician and nurses performed these catheter management activities in the observation group. The two groups were compared in terms of urinary tract infections, urinary tract irritation and hematuria signs, pain levels, and catheter retention time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 178 patients were included, among which 88 were divided into the control group and 90 into the observation group according to their corresponding urinary catheter removal method entered into the medical records system. The general characteristics of the two groups were similar (<i>p</i> > 0.05). However, the rates of urinary tract infections and urinary tract irritation and hematuria signs in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (1.11% vs. 9.09%, χ<sup>2</sup> = 5.902, <i>p</i> = 0.037; 5.55% vs. 15.91%, χ<sup>2</sup> = 4.159, <i>p</i> = 0.041, respectively). The observation group also exhibited lower levels of urinary pain within 1 h post-catheter removal and shorter total catheter retention time than the control group (t = 2.497, <i>p</i> = 0.013; t = 2.316, <i>p</i> = 0.022, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Collaborative medical-nursing catheter removal protocols for patients undergoing partial nephrectomy may effectively alleviate urinary pain, decrease the incidence of urinary tract infections and irritation and hematuria signs, and shorten catheter retention time, underscoring the clinical significance of its implementation in this specific population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia\",\"volume\":\"77 8\",\"pages\":\"897-902\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20247708.126\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20247708.126","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:泌尿科患者在手术后通常会被放置导尿管。因此,高质量、适当的管理和移除导尿管方案可大大减少导尿管相关并发症(如尿路感染),并提高患者的舒适度。这项回顾性研究调查了医护合作移除导尿管方案对降低泌尿外科手术患者尿路感染发生率的影响:方法:选取2021年1月至2022年12月期间在我院接受肾部分切除术的患者为研究对象,根据拔除导尿管的方法将其分为对照组和观察组。对照组由一名医生全权负责监测、评估和拔除导尿管,而观察组则由一名医生和护士负责这些导尿管管理活动。两组在尿路感染、尿路刺激和血尿体征、疼痛程度和导尿管留置时间等方面进行了比较:共纳入 178 例患者,根据病历系统中相应的导尿管拔除方法将其中 88 例患者分为对照组,90 例患者分为观察组。两组患者的一般特征相似(P>0.05)。但观察组尿路感染、尿路刺激征和血尿征的发生率低于对照组(分别为 1.11% vs. 9.09%,χ2 = 5.902,P = 0.037;5.55% vs. 15.91%,χ2 = 4.159,P = 0.041)。与对照组相比,观察组在导管拔除后 1 小时内的尿痛程度更低,导管留置总时间更短(分别为 t = 2.497,p = 0.013;t = 2.316,p = 0.022):结论:针对肾部分切除术患者的医护合作导尿管拔除方案可有效缓解尿痛,降低尿路感染、刺激症状和血尿的发生率,并缩短导尿管留置时间,在这一特殊人群中实施该方案具有重要的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of a Collaborative Medical-Nursing Catheter Removal Protocol on Incidence of Urinary Tract Infections in Urology Patients: A Retrospective Study.

Objective: Urology patients are often placed with a catheter following surgery. Hence, a high-quality and appropriate management and removal programme can considerably reduce catheter-associated complications such as urinary tract infections and improve patient comfort. This retrospective study investigated the impact of a collaborative medical-nursing catheter removal protocol on reducing the incidence of urinary tract infections in urological surgery patients.

Methods: Patients who underwent partial nephrectomy at our hospital between January 2021 and December 2022 were enrolled and allocated to a control and an observation group based on the method of urinary catheter removal. A physician was solely responsible for monitoring, evaluating, and removing the catheter in the control group, whereas a physician and nurses performed these catheter management activities in the observation group. The two groups were compared in terms of urinary tract infections, urinary tract irritation and hematuria signs, pain levels, and catheter retention time.

Results: A total of 178 patients were included, among which 88 were divided into the control group and 90 into the observation group according to their corresponding urinary catheter removal method entered into the medical records system. The general characteristics of the two groups were similar (p > 0.05). However, the rates of urinary tract infections and urinary tract irritation and hematuria signs in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (1.11% vs. 9.09%, χ2 = 5.902, p = 0.037; 5.55% vs. 15.91%, χ2 = 4.159, p = 0.041, respectively). The observation group also exhibited lower levels of urinary pain within 1 h post-catheter removal and shorter total catheter retention time than the control group (t = 2.497, p = 0.013; t = 2.316, p = 0.022, respectively).

Conclusions: Collaborative medical-nursing catheter removal protocols for patients undergoing partial nephrectomy may effectively alleviate urinary pain, decrease the incidence of urinary tract infections and irritation and hematuria signs, and shorten catheter retention time, underscoring the clinical significance of its implementation in this specific population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Archivos Españoles de Urología published since 1944, is an international peer review, susbscription Journal on Urology with original and review articles on different subjets in Urology: oncology, endourology, laparoscopic, andrology, lithiasis, pediatrics , urodynamics,... Case Report are also admitted.
期刊最新文献
A Single Center Experience of Special Cases: Isolated Adrenal Myelolipoma and Adrenocortical Adenoma with Myelolipomatous Component. Constructing an Evaluation and Assessment System for Urology Specialists Based on Entrustable Professional Activities. Active Surveillance as Preferred Treatment for ISUP Grade I Prostate Cancer: Confronting the ProtecT Trial. Aetiology and Prognostic Significance of Postoperative Urinary Tract Infections in Patients with Cervical Cancer. CEP70 in Prostate Cancer: A Novel Mechanism of Angiogenesis and Metastasis through Upregulation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A Expression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1