研究先天性畸形对腭裂儿童五岁时言语能力的影响。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1177/10556656241287759
Sophie Butterworth, Kate J Fitzsimons, Lorraine Britton, Stephanie Van Eeden, Jibby Medina, Jan van der Meulen, Craig J H Russell
{"title":"研究先天性畸形对腭裂儿童五岁时言语能力的影响。","authors":"Sophie Butterworth, Kate J Fitzsimons, Lorraine Britton, Stephanie Van Eeden, Jibby Medina, Jan van der Meulen, Craig J H Russell","doi":"10.1177/10556656241287759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether children born with a cleft palate ± lip (CP ± L) and additional congenital differences (ACDs - including 'Congenital malformations and deformations' as coded in ICD-10), are less likely to meet the three national speech outcome standards at age five compared to children with CP ± L and no ACDs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An observational study, utilizing national data from the UK Cleft Registry and Audit NEtwork (CRANE) Database linked to national administrative data of hospital admissions.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>National Health Service, England.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>2191 children (993 female, 1198 male) with CP ± L, born 2006-2012 in England, with complete speech data and consent to data linkage.</p><p><strong>Outcome measure: </strong>Perceptual speech analysis utilised the Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech - Augmented (CAPS-A) rating and United Kingdom National Speech Outcome Standards (Speech Standard 1 (SS1), Speech Standard 2a (SS2a) and Speech Standard 3 (SS3)).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2191 children, 759 (35%) had at least one ACD. Presence of one ACD did not significantly impact speech outcomes but two or more ACDs reduced the odds of achieving all three speech standards: SS1 aOR 0.602 (CI 0.45-0.82, <i>P</i> = .002), SS2a aOR 0.563 (CI 0.41-0.77, <i>P</i> = .001), SS3 aOR 0.606 (0.43-0.84, <i>P</i> = .003). When exploring ACDs by ICD-10 groupings, congenital malformations of the 'Eye, ear, face and neck', 'Circulatory system', 'Digestive system', 'Musculoskeletal system' and 'Other congenital malformations' reduced a child's odds of achieving the speech standards.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ACDs, in the absence of a known syndrome, have a significant impact on speech outcome at age five. Incorporating these factors into risk-adjustment models for service level outcome reporting is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the Impact of Additional Congenital Malformations on Speech Outcomes at age Five in Children with a Cleft Palate.\",\"authors\":\"Sophie Butterworth, Kate J Fitzsimons, Lorraine Britton, Stephanie Van Eeden, Jibby Medina, Jan van der Meulen, Craig J H Russell\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656241287759\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether children born with a cleft palate ± lip (CP ± L) and additional congenital differences (ACDs - including 'Congenital malformations and deformations' as coded in ICD-10), are less likely to meet the three national speech outcome standards at age five compared to children with CP ± L and no ACDs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>An observational study, utilizing national data from the UK Cleft Registry and Audit NEtwork (CRANE) Database linked to national administrative data of hospital admissions.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>National Health Service, England.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>2191 children (993 female, 1198 male) with CP ± L, born 2006-2012 in England, with complete speech data and consent to data linkage.</p><p><strong>Outcome measure: </strong>Perceptual speech analysis utilised the Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech - Augmented (CAPS-A) rating and United Kingdom National Speech Outcome Standards (Speech Standard 1 (SS1), Speech Standard 2a (SS2a) and Speech Standard 3 (SS3)).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2191 children, 759 (35%) had at least one ACD. Presence of one ACD did not significantly impact speech outcomes but two or more ACDs reduced the odds of achieving all three speech standards: SS1 aOR 0.602 (CI 0.45-0.82, <i>P</i> = .002), SS2a aOR 0.563 (CI 0.41-0.77, <i>P</i> = .001), SS3 aOR 0.606 (0.43-0.84, <i>P</i> = .003). When exploring ACDs by ICD-10 groupings, congenital malformations of the 'Eye, ear, face and neck', 'Circulatory system', 'Digestive system', 'Musculoskeletal system' and 'Other congenital malformations' reduced a child's odds of achieving the speech standards.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ACDs, in the absence of a known syndrome, have a significant impact on speech outcome at age five. Incorporating these factors into risk-adjustment models for service level outcome reporting is recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241287759\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241287759","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的确定与患有腭裂±唇裂(CP±L)和其他先天性差异(ACDs,包括 ICD-10 中编码的 "先天性畸形和变形")的儿童相比,患有腭裂±唇裂和其他先天性差异的儿童在五岁时达到三项国家语言能力标准的可能性是否更小:设计:一项观察性研究,利用英国裂隙登记和审计NEtwork(CRANE)数据库中的全国数据,并与全国入院管理数据相链接:背景:英国国民健康服务:患者:英格兰2006-2012年出生的2191名患有CP±L的儿童(993名女性,1198名男性),提供完整的语言数据并同意数据链接:结果:感知言语分析采用裂隙言语审计协议-增强(CAPS-A)评分和英国国家言语结果标准(言语标准 1 (SS1)、言语标准 2a (SS2a) 和言语标准 3 (SS3)):在 2191 名儿童中,759 人(35%)至少患有一种 ACD。患有一种 ACD 对言语能力的影响不大,但患有两种或两种以上 ACD 会降低达到所有三种言语能力标准的几率:SS1 aOR 0.602 (CI 0.45-0.82, P = .002), SS2a aOR 0.563 (CI 0.41-0.77, P = .001), SS3 aOR 0.606 (0.43-0.84, P = .003)。如果按 ICD-10 分组来研究先天性畸形,"眼、耳、面部和颈部"、"循环系统"、"消化系统"、"肌肉骨骼系统 "和 "其他先天性畸形 "的先天性畸形会降低儿童达到语言标准的几率:结论:在没有已知综合症的情况下,先天性畸形对五岁儿童的言语能力有显著影响。建议将这些因素纳入服务水平结果报告的风险调整模型中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigating the Impact of Additional Congenital Malformations on Speech Outcomes at age Five in Children with a Cleft Palate.

Objective: To determine whether children born with a cleft palate ± lip (CP ± L) and additional congenital differences (ACDs - including 'Congenital malformations and deformations' as coded in ICD-10), are less likely to meet the three national speech outcome standards at age five compared to children with CP ± L and no ACDs.

Design: An observational study, utilizing national data from the UK Cleft Registry and Audit NEtwork (CRANE) Database linked to national administrative data of hospital admissions.

Setting: National Health Service, England.

Patients: 2191 children (993 female, 1198 male) with CP ± L, born 2006-2012 in England, with complete speech data and consent to data linkage.

Outcome measure: Perceptual speech analysis utilised the Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech - Augmented (CAPS-A) rating and United Kingdom National Speech Outcome Standards (Speech Standard 1 (SS1), Speech Standard 2a (SS2a) and Speech Standard 3 (SS3)).

Results: Of 2191 children, 759 (35%) had at least one ACD. Presence of one ACD did not significantly impact speech outcomes but two or more ACDs reduced the odds of achieving all three speech standards: SS1 aOR 0.602 (CI 0.45-0.82, P = .002), SS2a aOR 0.563 (CI 0.41-0.77, P = .001), SS3 aOR 0.606 (0.43-0.84, P = .003). When exploring ACDs by ICD-10 groupings, congenital malformations of the 'Eye, ear, face and neck', 'Circulatory system', 'Digestive system', 'Musculoskeletal system' and 'Other congenital malformations' reduced a child's odds of achieving the speech standards.

Conclusions: ACDs, in the absence of a known syndrome, have a significant impact on speech outcome at age five. Incorporating these factors into risk-adjustment models for service level outcome reporting is recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
期刊最新文献
Standardization of Videorecorded Speech Samples for Children with Cleft Palate: Methods to Facilitate High-Quality Speech Outcomes Data Collection. Influence of Cleft Lip and Palate on Children's Recorder, Flute, and Clarinet Performance. Bridging Gaps in Health Literacy for Cleft Lip and Palate: Correspondence. Imaging Yield and Surgical Outcomes of Nasal, Medial Brow, Forehead, and Scalp Dermoid Cysts. Patient-Reported Esthetic Outcomes Following Secondary Rhinoplasty in Adult Patients with a Cleft lip and Palate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1