尽量减少膀胱癌在线全自动日常自适应放射治疗工作流程中的人为干扰。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-07 DOI:10.1186/s13014-024-02526-2
Sana Azzarouali, Karin Goudschaal, Jorrit Visser, Laurien Daniëls, Arjan Bel, Duncan den Boer
{"title":"尽量减少膀胱癌在线全自动日常自适应放射治疗工作流程中的人为干扰。","authors":"Sana Azzarouali, Karin Goudschaal, Jorrit Visser, Laurien Daniëls, Arjan Bel, Duncan den Boer","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02526-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim was to study the potential for an online fully automated daily adaptive radiotherapy (RT) workflow for bladder cancer, employing a focal boost and fiducial markers. The study focused on comparing the geometric and dosimetric aspects between the simulated automated online adaptive RT (oART) workflow and the clinically performed workflow.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer were treated with daily Cone Beam CT (CBCT)-guided oART. The bladder and pelvic lymph nodes (CTV<sub>elective</sub>) received a total dose of 40 Gy in 20 fractions and the tumor bed received an additional simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) of 15 Gy (CTV<sub>boost</sub>). During the online sessions a CBCT was acquired and used as input for the AI-network to automatically delineate the bladder and rectum, i.e. influencers. These influencers were employed to guide the algorithm utilized in the delineation process of the target. Manual adjustments to the generated contours are common during this clinical workflow prior to plan reoptimization and RT delivery. To study the potential for an online fully automated workflow, the oART workflow was repeated in a simulation environment without manual adjustments. A comparison was made between the clinical and automatic contours and between the treatment plans optimized on these clinical (D<sub>clin</sub>) and automatic contours (D<sub>auto</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bladder and rectum delineated by the AI-network differed from the clinical contours with a median Dice Similarity Coefficient of 0.99 and 0.92, a Mean Distance to Agreement of 1.9 mm and 1.3 mm and a relative volume of 100% and 95%, respectively. For the CTV<sub>boost</sub> these differences were larger, namely 0.71, 7 mm and 78%. For the CTV<sub>boost</sub> the median target coverage was 0.42% lower for D<sub>auto</sub> compared to D<sub>clin</sub>. For CTV<sub>elective</sub> this difference was 0.03%. The target coverage of D<sub>auto</sub> met the clinical requirement of the CTV-coverage in 65% of the sessions for CTV<sub>boost</sub> and 95% of the sessions for the CTV<sub>elective</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While an online fully automated daily adaptive RT workflow shows promise for bladder treatment, its complexity becomes apparent when incorporating a focal boost, necessitating manual checks to prevent potential underdosage of the target.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"19 1","pages":"138"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457325/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimizing human interference in an online fully automated daily adaptive radiotherapy workflow for bladder cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Sana Azzarouali, Karin Goudschaal, Jorrit Visser, Laurien Daniëls, Arjan Bel, Duncan den Boer\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13014-024-02526-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim was to study the potential for an online fully automated daily adaptive radiotherapy (RT) workflow for bladder cancer, employing a focal boost and fiducial markers. The study focused on comparing the geometric and dosimetric aspects between the simulated automated online adaptive RT (oART) workflow and the clinically performed workflow.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer were treated with daily Cone Beam CT (CBCT)-guided oART. The bladder and pelvic lymph nodes (CTV<sub>elective</sub>) received a total dose of 40 Gy in 20 fractions and the tumor bed received an additional simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) of 15 Gy (CTV<sub>boost</sub>). During the online sessions a CBCT was acquired and used as input for the AI-network to automatically delineate the bladder and rectum, i.e. influencers. These influencers were employed to guide the algorithm utilized in the delineation process of the target. Manual adjustments to the generated contours are common during this clinical workflow prior to plan reoptimization and RT delivery. To study the potential for an online fully automated workflow, the oART workflow was repeated in a simulation environment without manual adjustments. A comparison was made between the clinical and automatic contours and between the treatment plans optimized on these clinical (D<sub>clin</sub>) and automatic contours (D<sub>auto</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bladder and rectum delineated by the AI-network differed from the clinical contours with a median Dice Similarity Coefficient of 0.99 and 0.92, a Mean Distance to Agreement of 1.9 mm and 1.3 mm and a relative volume of 100% and 95%, respectively. For the CTV<sub>boost</sub> these differences were larger, namely 0.71, 7 mm and 78%. For the CTV<sub>boost</sub> the median target coverage was 0.42% lower for D<sub>auto</sub> compared to D<sub>clin</sub>. For CTV<sub>elective</sub> this difference was 0.03%. The target coverage of D<sub>auto</sub> met the clinical requirement of the CTV-coverage in 65% of the sessions for CTV<sub>boost</sub> and 95% of the sessions for the CTV<sub>elective</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While an online fully automated daily adaptive RT workflow shows promise for bladder treatment, its complexity becomes apparent when incorporating a focal boost, necessitating manual checks to prevent potential underdosage of the target.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457325/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02526-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02526-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究采用病灶增强和靶标对膀胱癌进行在线全自动日常自适应放射治疗(RT)工作流程的潜力。研究重点是比较模拟自动在线自适应 RT(oART)工作流程与临床工作流程之间的几何和剂量测定方面:17名肌肉浸润性膀胱癌患者接受了锥形束 CT(CBCT)引导下的每日 oART 治疗。膀胱和盆腔淋巴结(CTVelective)在20个分次中接受40 Gy的总剂量,肿瘤床接受15 Gy的额外同时综合增强(SIB)(CTVboost)。在线会话期间,获取 CBCT 并将其作为人工智能网络的输入,以自动划分膀胱和直肠,即影响因素。这些影响因素用于指导目标划定过程中使用的算法。在这种临床工作流程中,在重新优化计划和实施 RT 之前,手动调整生成的轮廓是很常见的。为了研究在线全自动工作流程的潜力,我们在模拟环境中重复了没有手动调整的 oART 工作流程。对临床轮廓和自动轮廓以及根据这些临床轮廓(Dclin)和自动轮廓(Dauto)优化的治疗计划进行了比较:结果:人工智能网络绘制的膀胱和直肠轮廓与临床轮廓不同,中位骰子相似系数分别为 0.99 和 0.92,平均一致距离分别为 1.9 毫米和 1.3 毫米,相对体积分别为 100%和 95%。而 CTVboost 的差异更大,分别为 0.71、7 毫米和 78%。与 Dclin 相比,Dauto 的 CTVboost 中位目标覆盖率低 0.42%。对于 CTVelective,这一差异为 0.03%。在65%的CTVboost疗程和95%的CTVelective疗程中,Dauto的目标覆盖率达到了CTV覆盖率的临床要求:尽管在线全自动每日自适应 RT 工作流程在膀胱治疗中大有可为,但当加入病灶增强时,其复杂性就显而易见了,必须进行人工检查以防止潜在的目标剂量不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Minimizing human interference in an online fully automated daily adaptive radiotherapy workflow for bladder cancer.

Purpose: The aim was to study the potential for an online fully automated daily adaptive radiotherapy (RT) workflow for bladder cancer, employing a focal boost and fiducial markers. The study focused on comparing the geometric and dosimetric aspects between the simulated automated online adaptive RT (oART) workflow and the clinically performed workflow.

Methods: Seventeen patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer were treated with daily Cone Beam CT (CBCT)-guided oART. The bladder and pelvic lymph nodes (CTVelective) received a total dose of 40 Gy in 20 fractions and the tumor bed received an additional simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) of 15 Gy (CTVboost). During the online sessions a CBCT was acquired and used as input for the AI-network to automatically delineate the bladder and rectum, i.e. influencers. These influencers were employed to guide the algorithm utilized in the delineation process of the target. Manual adjustments to the generated contours are common during this clinical workflow prior to plan reoptimization and RT delivery. To study the potential for an online fully automated workflow, the oART workflow was repeated in a simulation environment without manual adjustments. A comparison was made between the clinical and automatic contours and between the treatment plans optimized on these clinical (Dclin) and automatic contours (Dauto).

Results: The bladder and rectum delineated by the AI-network differed from the clinical contours with a median Dice Similarity Coefficient of 0.99 and 0.92, a Mean Distance to Agreement of 1.9 mm and 1.3 mm and a relative volume of 100% and 95%, respectively. For the CTVboost these differences were larger, namely 0.71, 7 mm and 78%. For the CTVboost the median target coverage was 0.42% lower for Dauto compared to Dclin. For CTVelective this difference was 0.03%. The target coverage of Dauto met the clinical requirement of the CTV-coverage in 65% of the sessions for CTVboost and 95% of the sessions for the CTVelective.

Conclusions: While an online fully automated daily adaptive RT workflow shows promise for bladder treatment, its complexity becomes apparent when incorporating a focal boost, necessitating manual checks to prevent potential underdosage of the target.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation Oncology
Radiation Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
181
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Oncology encompasses all aspects of research that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. It publishes findings in molecular and cellular radiation biology, radiation physics, radiation technology, and clinical oncology.
期刊最新文献
The impact of radiation-related lymphocyte recovery on the prognosis of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a retrospective analysis. Correction: Artificial intelligence contouring in radiotherapy for organs-at-risk and lymph node areas. Deep learning-based synthetic CT for dosimetric monitoring of combined conventional radiotherapy and lattice boost in large lung tumors. Correction: The significance of risk stratification through nomogram-based assessment in determining postmastectomy radiotherapy for patients diagnosed with pT1 - 2N1M0 breast cancer. Sequential or simultaneous-integrated boost in early-stage breast cancer patients: trade-offs between skin toxicity and risk of compromised coverage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1