医疗最大化取向与对低价值筛查的渴望:对中介机制的研究。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Medical Decision Making Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-08 DOI:10.1177/0272989X241285009
Soela Kim
{"title":"医疗最大化取向与对低价值筛查的渴望:对中介机制的研究。","authors":"Soela Kim","doi":"10.1177/0272989X241285009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical maximizing orientation is a stable, traitlike inclination to actively use health care, often associated with pursuing low-value care. Despite attempts to reduce the overuse of low-value care by targeting this orientation directly, such interventions have not always been effective. To design effective interventions to reduce the overuse of low-value care, it is critical to understand the underlying mechanisms that govern the impact of medical maximizing orientation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine whether risk perception (deliberative, affective, and experiential) and knowledge of the benefits and harms of low-value screening mediate the potential impact of medical maximizing orientation on attitudes toward screening uptake and screening decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A secondary analysis was conducted on data from a Web-based experiment examining various communication tactics in an information booklet regarding low-value thyroid ultrasonography among South Korean women (<i>N</i> = 492). Multiple linear, zero-inflated negative binomial and multinomial logistic regressions were used to examine the relationships between medical maximizing orientation and other study variables. A mediation analysis was performed to test mediating mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Medical maximizing orientation was associated with an increased positive attitude toward screening uptake and a lower likelihood of deciding not to get screened or being uncertain regarding screening decisions (relative to deciding to get screened). Knowledge and affective risk perception partially mediated the relationship between medical maximizing orientation and positive attitudes. Knowledge, deliberative, and affective risk perceptions partially mediated the relationship between medical maximizing orientation and the screening decision.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interventions should prioritize targeting more amenable factors arising from medical maximizing orientation, such as inflated risk perceptions, particularly affective risk perception, and limited comprehension or acceptance of information about the benefits and risks associated with low-value care.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>This study demonstrated that people's medical maximizing orientation can increase their positive attitudes toward the uptake of low-value screening and make them more likely to undergo it. This can happen both directly and indirectly by decreasing their understanding of the benefits and risks of screening and increasing their perception of disease risk.The study suggests that to effectively mitigate the excessive utilization of low-value care through patient-centered interventions, it is crucial to tackle 2 key issues associated with a medical maximizing mindset: inflated risk perceptions (specifically affective risk perception) and limited comprehension or acceptance of information about the benefits and risks of low-value care.This study contributes to developing a theoretical framework for interventions to improve evidence-based medical decision making by uncovering one mechanism by which medical maximizing orientation may affect the propensity to seek low-value care.</p>","PeriodicalId":49839,"journal":{"name":"Medical Decision Making","volume":" ","pages":"927-943"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical Maximizing Orientation and the Desire for Low-Value Screening: An Examination of Mediating Mechanisms.\",\"authors\":\"Soela Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0272989X241285009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical maximizing orientation is a stable, traitlike inclination to actively use health care, often associated with pursuing low-value care. Despite attempts to reduce the overuse of low-value care by targeting this orientation directly, such interventions have not always been effective. To design effective interventions to reduce the overuse of low-value care, it is critical to understand the underlying mechanisms that govern the impact of medical maximizing orientation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine whether risk perception (deliberative, affective, and experiential) and knowledge of the benefits and harms of low-value screening mediate the potential impact of medical maximizing orientation on attitudes toward screening uptake and screening decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A secondary analysis was conducted on data from a Web-based experiment examining various communication tactics in an information booklet regarding low-value thyroid ultrasonography among South Korean women (<i>N</i> = 492). Multiple linear, zero-inflated negative binomial and multinomial logistic regressions were used to examine the relationships between medical maximizing orientation and other study variables. A mediation analysis was performed to test mediating mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Medical maximizing orientation was associated with an increased positive attitude toward screening uptake and a lower likelihood of deciding not to get screened or being uncertain regarding screening decisions (relative to deciding to get screened). Knowledge and affective risk perception partially mediated the relationship between medical maximizing orientation and positive attitudes. Knowledge, deliberative, and affective risk perceptions partially mediated the relationship between medical maximizing orientation and the screening decision.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interventions should prioritize targeting more amenable factors arising from medical maximizing orientation, such as inflated risk perceptions, particularly affective risk perception, and limited comprehension or acceptance of information about the benefits and risks associated with low-value care.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>This study demonstrated that people's medical maximizing orientation can increase their positive attitudes toward the uptake of low-value screening and make them more likely to undergo it. This can happen both directly and indirectly by decreasing their understanding of the benefits and risks of screening and increasing their perception of disease risk.The study suggests that to effectively mitigate the excessive utilization of low-value care through patient-centered interventions, it is crucial to tackle 2 key issues associated with a medical maximizing mindset: inflated risk perceptions (specifically affective risk perception) and limited comprehension or acceptance of information about the benefits and risks of low-value care.This study contributes to developing a theoretical framework for interventions to improve evidence-based medical decision making by uncovering one mechanism by which medical maximizing orientation may affect the propensity to seek low-value care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Decision Making\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"927-943\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Decision Making\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X241285009\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X241285009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医疗最大化取向是一种稳定的、积极使用医疗服务的特质倾向,通常与追求低价值医疗服务有关。尽管有人试图通过直接针对这种取向来减少低价值医疗的过度使用,但这种干预措施并不总是有效。为了设计有效的干预措施来减少低价值医疗的过度使用,了解医疗最大化取向的潜在影响机制至关重要:目的:研究风险感知(深思熟虑、情感和经验)以及对低价值筛查的益处和害处的了解是否能调节医疗最大化导向对筛查接受态度和筛查决策的潜在影响:我们对一项基于网络的实验数据进行了二次分析,该实验研究了有关低价值甲状腺超声检查的信息手册中的各种沟通策略,实验对象为韩国女性(N = 492)。采用多重线性、零膨胀负二项和多二项逻辑回归来检验医疗最大化导向与其他研究变量之间的关系。还进行了中介分析以检验中介机制:结果:医疗最大化取向与对筛查的积极态度增加、决定不接受筛查或对筛查决定不确定的可能性降低(相对于决定接受筛查)有关。知识和情感风险认知在一定程度上调节了医疗最大化导向与积极态度之间的关系。知识、深思熟虑和情感性风险认知部分调节了医疗最大化取向与筛查决定之间的关系:干预措施应优先针对医疗最大化取向所产生的更多有利因素,如夸大的风险认知,尤其是情感风险认知,以及对与低价值医疗相关的收益和风险信息的理解或接受程度有限:本研究表明,人们的医疗最大化取向会增加他们对接受低价值筛查的积极态度,并使他们更有可能接受筛查。这项研究表明,要想通过以患者为中心的干预措施有效缓解过度使用低价值医疗的问题,关键是要解决与医疗最大化心态相关的两个关键问题:夸大风险认知(特别是情感风险认知)以及对低价值医疗的益处和风险信息的理解或接受程度有限。本研究通过揭示医疗最大化取向可能影响寻求低价值医疗倾向的一种机制,为制定干预措施以改善循证医疗决策的理论框架做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Medical Maximizing Orientation and the Desire for Low-Value Screening: An Examination of Mediating Mechanisms.

Background: Medical maximizing orientation is a stable, traitlike inclination to actively use health care, often associated with pursuing low-value care. Despite attempts to reduce the overuse of low-value care by targeting this orientation directly, such interventions have not always been effective. To design effective interventions to reduce the overuse of low-value care, it is critical to understand the underlying mechanisms that govern the impact of medical maximizing orientation.

Objective: To examine whether risk perception (deliberative, affective, and experiential) and knowledge of the benefits and harms of low-value screening mediate the potential impact of medical maximizing orientation on attitudes toward screening uptake and screening decisions.

Methods: A secondary analysis was conducted on data from a Web-based experiment examining various communication tactics in an information booklet regarding low-value thyroid ultrasonography among South Korean women (N = 492). Multiple linear, zero-inflated negative binomial and multinomial logistic regressions were used to examine the relationships between medical maximizing orientation and other study variables. A mediation analysis was performed to test mediating mechanisms.

Results: Medical maximizing orientation was associated with an increased positive attitude toward screening uptake and a lower likelihood of deciding not to get screened or being uncertain regarding screening decisions (relative to deciding to get screened). Knowledge and affective risk perception partially mediated the relationship between medical maximizing orientation and positive attitudes. Knowledge, deliberative, and affective risk perceptions partially mediated the relationship between medical maximizing orientation and the screening decision.

Conclusions: Interventions should prioritize targeting more amenable factors arising from medical maximizing orientation, such as inflated risk perceptions, particularly affective risk perception, and limited comprehension or acceptance of information about the benefits and risks associated with low-value care.

Highlights: This study demonstrated that people's medical maximizing orientation can increase their positive attitudes toward the uptake of low-value screening and make them more likely to undergo it. This can happen both directly and indirectly by decreasing their understanding of the benefits and risks of screening and increasing their perception of disease risk.The study suggests that to effectively mitigate the excessive utilization of low-value care through patient-centered interventions, it is crucial to tackle 2 key issues associated with a medical maximizing mindset: inflated risk perceptions (specifically affective risk perception) and limited comprehension or acceptance of information about the benefits and risks of low-value care.This study contributes to developing a theoretical framework for interventions to improve evidence-based medical decision making by uncovering one mechanism by which medical maximizing orientation may affect the propensity to seek low-value care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Decision Making
Medical Decision Making 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Decision Making offers rigorous and systematic approaches to decision making that are designed to improve the health and clinical care of individuals and to assist with health care policy development. Using the fundamentals of decision analysis and theory, economic evaluation, and evidence based quality assessment, Medical Decision Making presents both theoretical and practical statistical and modeling techniques and methods from a variety of disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Unclear Trajectory and Uncertain Benefit: Creating a Lexicon for Clinical Uncertainty in Patients with Critical or Advanced Illness Using a Delphi Consensus Process. Multi-indication Evidence Synthesis in Oncology Health Technology Assessment: Meta-analysis Methods and Their Application to a Case Study of Bevacizumab. Use of Adaptive Conjoint Analysis-Based Values Clarification in a Patient Decision Aid Is Not Associated with Better Perceived Values Clarity or Reduced Decisional Conflict but Enhances Values Congruence. A Sequential Calibration Approach to Address Challenges of Repeated Calibration of a COVID-19 Model. A Longitudinal Study of the Association of Awareness of Disease Incurability with Patient-Reported Outcomes in Heart Failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1