Pavol Vigláš, Vojtěch Smolka, Jan Raupach, Aleš Hejčl, David Černík, Filip Cihlář
{"title":"颈动脉支架植入术中定制抗血小板疗法的效果:一项回顾性比较研究。","authors":"Pavol Vigláš, Vojtěch Smolka, Jan Raupach, Aleš Hejčl, David Černík, Filip Cihlář","doi":"10.1186/s42155-024-00482-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carotid stenting requires dual antiplatelet therapy to effectively prevent thromboembolic complications. However, resistance to clopidogrel, a key component of this therapy, may lead to persistent risk of these complications. The aim of this study was to determine, if the implementation of routine platelet function testing and adjusting therapy was associated with lower incidence of thromboembolic complications and death.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive patients treated with carotid artery stenting in a single institution over 8 years were enlisted in a retrospective study. Platelet function testing was performed, and efficient antiplatelet therapy was set before the procedure. Incidence of procedure-related stroke or death within periprocedural period (0-30 days) was assessed. The results were evaluated in relation to the findings of six prominent randomized control trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 241 patients were treated for carotid stenosis, seven patients undergo CAS on both sides over time. There was 138 symptomatic (55,6%) and 110 asymptomatic stenoses (44,4%). Five thromboembolic complications (2,01%) occurred, four of them (1,61%) was procedure-related. Two patients died because of procedure-related stroke (0,82%). Incidence of procedure-related stroke or death was significant lower compared to the results of CREST study (2,01% vs. 4,81%, P = 0,0243) in the entire cohorts, and to the results of ICSS study in the symptomatic cohorts (2,86% vs. 7,37%, P = 0,0243), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tailored antiplatelet therapy in carotid stenting is safe and seems to be related with lower incidence of procedure-related death or stroke rate. Larger prospective studies to assess whether platelet function testing-guided antiplatelet therapy is superior to standard dual antiplatelet should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":52351,"journal":{"name":"CVIR Endovascular","volume":"7 1","pages":"73"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11461431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome of tailored antiplatelet therapy in carotid stenting: a retrospective comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Pavol Vigláš, Vojtěch Smolka, Jan Raupach, Aleš Hejčl, David Černík, Filip Cihlář\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42155-024-00482-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Carotid stenting requires dual antiplatelet therapy to effectively prevent thromboembolic complications. However, resistance to clopidogrel, a key component of this therapy, may lead to persistent risk of these complications. The aim of this study was to determine, if the implementation of routine platelet function testing and adjusting therapy was associated with lower incidence of thromboembolic complications and death.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive patients treated with carotid artery stenting in a single institution over 8 years were enlisted in a retrospective study. Platelet function testing was performed, and efficient antiplatelet therapy was set before the procedure. Incidence of procedure-related stroke or death within periprocedural period (0-30 days) was assessed. The results were evaluated in relation to the findings of six prominent randomized control trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 241 patients were treated for carotid stenosis, seven patients undergo CAS on both sides over time. There was 138 symptomatic (55,6%) and 110 asymptomatic stenoses (44,4%). Five thromboembolic complications (2,01%) occurred, four of them (1,61%) was procedure-related. Two patients died because of procedure-related stroke (0,82%). Incidence of procedure-related stroke or death was significant lower compared to the results of CREST study (2,01% vs. 4,81%, P = 0,0243) in the entire cohorts, and to the results of ICSS study in the symptomatic cohorts (2,86% vs. 7,37%, P = 0,0243), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tailored antiplatelet therapy in carotid stenting is safe and seems to be related with lower incidence of procedure-related death or stroke rate. Larger prospective studies to assess whether platelet function testing-guided antiplatelet therapy is superior to standard dual antiplatelet should be considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CVIR Endovascular\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11461431/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CVIR Endovascular\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-024-00482-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CVIR Endovascular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-024-00482-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:颈动脉支架置入术需要双重抗血小板治疗,以有效预防血栓栓塞并发症。然而,对这种疗法的关键成分氯吡格雷的耐药性可能会导致这些并发症的风险持续存在。本研究旨在确定常规血小板功能检测和调整治疗是否与降低血栓栓塞并发症和死亡发生率有关:方法:在一项回顾性研究中,纳入了一家医疗机构 8 年来用颈动脉支架治疗的所有连续患者。进行了血小板功能检测,并在手术前设定了有效的抗血小板疗法。评估了围手术期(0-30 天)内与手术相关的中风或死亡发生率。结果与六项著名随机对照试验的结果进行了对比评估:结果:共有241名颈动脉狭窄患者接受了治疗,其中7名患者接受了双侧CAS。其中138例为无症状狭窄(55.6%),110例为无症状狭窄(44.4%)。发生了五例血栓栓塞并发症(2.01%),其中四例(1.61%)与手术有关。两名患者死于手术相关中风(0.82%)。与CREST研究结果(2.01% vs. 4.81%,P = 0.0243)相比,手术相关中风或死亡的发生率明显降低;与ICSS研究结果(2.86% vs. 7.37%,P = 0.0243)相比,无症状队列的发生率明显降低:结论:颈动脉支架置入术中的定制抗血小板治疗是安全的,而且似乎与较低的手术相关死亡或中风发生率有关。应考虑开展更大规模的前瞻性研究,以评估血小板功能检测指导下的抗血小板疗法是否优于标准的双联抗血小板疗法。
Outcome of tailored antiplatelet therapy in carotid stenting: a retrospective comparative study.
Background: Carotid stenting requires dual antiplatelet therapy to effectively prevent thromboembolic complications. However, resistance to clopidogrel, a key component of this therapy, may lead to persistent risk of these complications. The aim of this study was to determine, if the implementation of routine platelet function testing and adjusting therapy was associated with lower incidence of thromboembolic complications and death.
Methods: All consecutive patients treated with carotid artery stenting in a single institution over 8 years were enlisted in a retrospective study. Platelet function testing was performed, and efficient antiplatelet therapy was set before the procedure. Incidence of procedure-related stroke or death within periprocedural period (0-30 days) was assessed. The results were evaluated in relation to the findings of six prominent randomized control trials.
Results: A total of 241 patients were treated for carotid stenosis, seven patients undergo CAS on both sides over time. There was 138 symptomatic (55,6%) and 110 asymptomatic stenoses (44,4%). Five thromboembolic complications (2,01%) occurred, four of them (1,61%) was procedure-related. Two patients died because of procedure-related stroke (0,82%). Incidence of procedure-related stroke or death was significant lower compared to the results of CREST study (2,01% vs. 4,81%, P = 0,0243) in the entire cohorts, and to the results of ICSS study in the symptomatic cohorts (2,86% vs. 7,37%, P = 0,0243), respectively.
Conclusions: Tailored antiplatelet therapy in carotid stenting is safe and seems to be related with lower incidence of procedure-related death or stroke rate. Larger prospective studies to assess whether platelet function testing-guided antiplatelet therapy is superior to standard dual antiplatelet should be considered.