Mees Paulus Emmelot , Robert Kaspar Wagner , Frank Floris Smithuis , Robert Hemke , Stein Jasper Janssen , Peter Kloen
{"title":"胫骨平台骨折时股骨髁损伤的发生率。","authors":"Mees Paulus Emmelot , Robert Kaspar Wagner , Frank Floris Smithuis , Robert Hemke , Stein Jasper Janssen , Peter Kloen","doi":"10.1016/j.knee.2024.09.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Tibial plateau fracture patterns are influenced by the direction and energy of the impact, and the bone quality. Associated articular femoral injuries can result from the same impact but are insufficiently studied. This study quantifies the prevalence of three distinct articular femoral condyle injuries: (1) impaction fractures, (2) contusions, and (3) condyle fractures. For impaction fractures we assessed the depth, width, length, and surface area.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed patients who had undergone surgery for a tibial plateau fracture in a tertiary trauma center. Two fellowship-trained radiologists analyzed preoperative CT scans for associated femoral condyle injuries. We defined (1) impaction fractures (depressions ≥ 1.5 mm) with a sclerotic band, a fracture line, or both; (2) contusions (depressions < 1.5 mm) with a sclerotic band; and (3) condyle fractures as sub- or osteochondral fractures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 149 patients (62 male) with a tibial plateau fracture with a CT scan available. The overall prevalence of articular femoral condyle injuries was 26% (n = 39). The prevalence of impaction fractures was 9.4% (n = 14), of contusions 14% (n = 21), and of condylar fractures 3.0% (n = 4). Factors associated with a higher prevalence of femoral condyle injury were younger age (<em>p</em> = 0.029), male sex (<em>p</em> = 0.014), and absence of comorbidity (<em>p</em> = 0.005). The mean depth of impaction fractures was 2.3 mm (SD: 0.78; range 1.6 to 4).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Concomitant articular femoral condyle injuries occur in one out of four patients with a tibial plateau fracture. Although most femoral injuries were subtle, and none underwent surgical treatment, they might harbor information regarding the likelihood of future joint degeneration and knee instability.</div><div><strong>Level of evidence:</strong> IV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56110,"journal":{"name":"Knee","volume":"51 ","pages":"Pages 221-230"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of femoral condyle injuries in the setting of tibial plateau fractures\",\"authors\":\"Mees Paulus Emmelot , Robert Kaspar Wagner , Frank Floris Smithuis , Robert Hemke , Stein Jasper Janssen , Peter Kloen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.knee.2024.09.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Tibial plateau fracture patterns are influenced by the direction and energy of the impact, and the bone quality. Associated articular femoral injuries can result from the same impact but are insufficiently studied. This study quantifies the prevalence of three distinct articular femoral condyle injuries: (1) impaction fractures, (2) contusions, and (3) condyle fractures. For impaction fractures we assessed the depth, width, length, and surface area.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively reviewed patients who had undergone surgery for a tibial plateau fracture in a tertiary trauma center. Two fellowship-trained radiologists analyzed preoperative CT scans for associated femoral condyle injuries. We defined (1) impaction fractures (depressions ≥ 1.5 mm) with a sclerotic band, a fracture line, or both; (2) contusions (depressions < 1.5 mm) with a sclerotic band; and (3) condyle fractures as sub- or osteochondral fractures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 149 patients (62 male) with a tibial plateau fracture with a CT scan available. The overall prevalence of articular femoral condyle injuries was 26% (n = 39). The prevalence of impaction fractures was 9.4% (n = 14), of contusions 14% (n = 21), and of condylar fractures 3.0% (n = 4). Factors associated with a higher prevalence of femoral condyle injury were younger age (<em>p</em> = 0.029), male sex (<em>p</em> = 0.014), and absence of comorbidity (<em>p</em> = 0.005). The mean depth of impaction fractures was 2.3 mm (SD: 0.78; range 1.6 to 4).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Concomitant articular femoral condyle injuries occur in one out of four patients with a tibial plateau fracture. Although most femoral injuries were subtle, and none underwent surgical treatment, they might harbor information regarding the likelihood of future joint degeneration and knee instability.</div><div><strong>Level of evidence:</strong> IV.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knee\",\"volume\":\"51 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 221-230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knee\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016024001704\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016024001704","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prevalence of femoral condyle injuries in the setting of tibial plateau fractures
Background
Tibial plateau fracture patterns are influenced by the direction and energy of the impact, and the bone quality. Associated articular femoral injuries can result from the same impact but are insufficiently studied. This study quantifies the prevalence of three distinct articular femoral condyle injuries: (1) impaction fractures, (2) contusions, and (3) condyle fractures. For impaction fractures we assessed the depth, width, length, and surface area.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed patients who had undergone surgery for a tibial plateau fracture in a tertiary trauma center. Two fellowship-trained radiologists analyzed preoperative CT scans for associated femoral condyle injuries. We defined (1) impaction fractures (depressions ≥ 1.5 mm) with a sclerotic band, a fracture line, or both; (2) contusions (depressions < 1.5 mm) with a sclerotic band; and (3) condyle fractures as sub- or osteochondral fractures.
Results
We identified 149 patients (62 male) with a tibial plateau fracture with a CT scan available. The overall prevalence of articular femoral condyle injuries was 26% (n = 39). The prevalence of impaction fractures was 9.4% (n = 14), of contusions 14% (n = 21), and of condylar fractures 3.0% (n = 4). Factors associated with a higher prevalence of femoral condyle injury were younger age (p = 0.029), male sex (p = 0.014), and absence of comorbidity (p = 0.005). The mean depth of impaction fractures was 2.3 mm (SD: 0.78; range 1.6 to 4).
Conclusion
Concomitant articular femoral condyle injuries occur in one out of four patients with a tibial plateau fracture. Although most femoral injuries were subtle, and none underwent surgical treatment, they might harbor information regarding the likelihood of future joint degeneration and knee instability.
期刊介绍:
The Knee is an international journal publishing studies on the clinical treatment and fundamental biomechanical characteristics of this joint. The aim of the journal is to provide a vehicle relevant to surgeons, biomedical engineers, imaging specialists, materials scientists, rehabilitation personnel and all those with an interest in the knee.
The topics covered include, but are not limited to:
• Anatomy, physiology, morphology and biochemistry;
• Biomechanical studies;
• Advances in the development of prosthetic, orthotic and augmentation devices;
• Imaging and diagnostic techniques;
• Pathology;
• Trauma;
• Surgery;
• Rehabilitation.