训练方法和奶牛个性特征对适应全自动挤奶系统的影响。

IF 3.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Journal of Dairy Science Pub Date : 2024-10-08 DOI:10.3168/jds.2024-25420
J E Brasier, A J Schwanke, R Bergeron, D B Haley, T J DeVries
{"title":"训练方法和奶牛个性特征对适应全自动挤奶系统的影响。","authors":"J E Brasier, A J Schwanke, R Bergeron, D B Haley, T J DeVries","doi":"10.3168/jds.2024-25420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Training dairy cows on the automated milking system (AMS) can improve their performance, however, the ideal training method and how their individual personality relates to training is unknown. The objectives of this study were to determine: 1) the effect of AMS training method on adaptation of primiparous cows to an AMS, 2) whether the personality of a cow affects their adaptation to the AMS, and 3) whether certain personality types adapt better based on the type of training they receive. Forty-eight primiparous Holstein dairy cows, who had not previously been milked by an AMS, were enrolled in the study at ∼85 DIM and were assessed for personality traits using a combined arena test comprised of 3 parts: a novel arena test, a novel object test, and a novel human test. Cows were allocated into 1 of 4 AMS training treatments (n = 12): control (CON; no training), environment exposure only (ENV), environment and AMS concentrate provision (PEL), and environment and mechanics exposure (MEC). Cows in the ENV, PEL, and MEC treatments were subjected to training 4 × /d for 4 d, and then cows from all 4 treatments were milked on the AMS in the evening of the 4th training d. Milking activity and production were recorded for the first 14 d on the AMS. PEL cows had fewer visits to the AMS, fewer milkings, and fewer voluntary milkings compared with CON cows across the 14 d. Cows on all experimental treatments had more fetching events than CON cows, while MEC and ENV treatment cows had a higher milk yield compared with those on the CON treatment. Principal component analysis of the behaviors recorded during the personality assessment revealed 2 factors interpreted as personality traits, \"explore-active\" and \"bold.\" Across all cows, more \"explore-active\" cows had greater milk yield. Only the performance of ENV cows was associated with personality; ENV cows who scored low for \"explore-active\" differed from CON cows, through increased visits and voluntary milkings. Overall, the results demonstrate that providing concentrate on its own during AMS training may not be motivating enough to improve adaptation and performance. However, exposing cows to the mechanics (e.g., the robotic arm and sounds of the AMS) before first milking may improve milk yield. Finally, cow personality may influence the performance of cows trained using less complicated training methods, such as only exposing them to the environment of the AMS.</p>","PeriodicalId":354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dairy Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of training method and dairy cow personality traits on adaptation to an automated milking system.\",\"authors\":\"J E Brasier, A J Schwanke, R Bergeron, D B Haley, T J DeVries\",\"doi\":\"10.3168/jds.2024-25420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Training dairy cows on the automated milking system (AMS) can improve their performance, however, the ideal training method and how their individual personality relates to training is unknown. The objectives of this study were to determine: 1) the effect of AMS training method on adaptation of primiparous cows to an AMS, 2) whether the personality of a cow affects their adaptation to the AMS, and 3) whether certain personality types adapt better based on the type of training they receive. Forty-eight primiparous Holstein dairy cows, who had not previously been milked by an AMS, were enrolled in the study at ∼85 DIM and were assessed for personality traits using a combined arena test comprised of 3 parts: a novel arena test, a novel object test, and a novel human test. Cows were allocated into 1 of 4 AMS training treatments (n = 12): control (CON; no training), environment exposure only (ENV), environment and AMS concentrate provision (PEL), and environment and mechanics exposure (MEC). Cows in the ENV, PEL, and MEC treatments were subjected to training 4 × /d for 4 d, and then cows from all 4 treatments were milked on the AMS in the evening of the 4th training d. Milking activity and production were recorded for the first 14 d on the AMS. PEL cows had fewer visits to the AMS, fewer milkings, and fewer voluntary milkings compared with CON cows across the 14 d. Cows on all experimental treatments had more fetching events than CON cows, while MEC and ENV treatment cows had a higher milk yield compared with those on the CON treatment. Principal component analysis of the behaviors recorded during the personality assessment revealed 2 factors interpreted as personality traits, \\\"explore-active\\\" and \\\"bold.\\\" Across all cows, more \\\"explore-active\\\" cows had greater milk yield. Only the performance of ENV cows was associated with personality; ENV cows who scored low for \\\"explore-active\\\" differed from CON cows, through increased visits and voluntary milkings. Overall, the results demonstrate that providing concentrate on its own during AMS training may not be motivating enough to improve adaptation and performance. However, exposing cows to the mechanics (e.g., the robotic arm and sounds of the AMS) before first milking may improve milk yield. Finally, cow personality may influence the performance of cows trained using less complicated training methods, such as only exposing them to the environment of the AMS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dairy Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dairy Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-25420\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dairy Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2024-25420","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对奶牛进行全自动挤奶系统(AMS)培训可提高它们的生产性能,但理想的培训方法以及奶牛的个性与培训的关系尚不清楚。本研究的目的是确定1)全自动机器人挤奶系统培训方法对初产奶牛适应全自动机器人挤奶系统的影响;2)奶牛的个性是否会影响其对全自动机器人挤奶系统的适应;3)某些个性类型的奶牛是否会根据其接受的培训类型更好地适应全自动机器人挤奶系统。48头初产荷斯坦奶牛在产后85天内参加了这项研究,这些奶牛以前从未接受过AMS的挤奶训练,研究人员使用由3个部分组成的综合竞技场测试对它们的个性特征进行了评估:新奇竞技场测试、新奇物体测试和新奇人类测试。奶牛被分配到4种AMS训练处理中的一种(n = 12):对照组(CON;无训练)、仅环境暴露组(ENV)、环境和AMS精料提供组(PEL)以及环境和机械暴露组(MEC)。ENV、PEL和MEC处理的奶牛每天接受4×4天的训练,然后在第4个训练日的傍晚在AMS上对所有4种处理的奶牛进行挤奶。与CON奶牛相比,PEL奶牛在14天内到AMS挤奶的次数更少,挤奶次数更少,自愿挤奶次数更少。与CON奶牛相比,所有实验处理的奶牛都有更多的取乳行为,而与CON处理的奶牛相比,MEC和ENV处理的奶牛产奶量更高。对个性评估期间记录的行为进行主成分分析,发现了两个可解释为个性特征的因子,即 "探索-积极 "和 "大胆"。在所有奶牛中,"探索积极 "的奶牛产奶量更高。只有ENV奶牛的表现与个性有关;"探索-活跃 "得分低的ENV奶牛与CON奶牛不同,它们的巡视次数和自愿挤奶次数增加。总之,研究结果表明,在 AMS 培训期间,仅提供精料可能不足以激励奶牛提高适应性和生产性能。不过,在第一次挤奶前让奶牛接触机械装置(如机械臂和AMS的声音)可能会提高产奶量。最后,奶牛的个性可能会影响采用不太复杂的训练方法(如只让奶牛接触自动挤奶系统的环境)训练的奶牛的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of training method and dairy cow personality traits on adaptation to an automated milking system.

Training dairy cows on the automated milking system (AMS) can improve their performance, however, the ideal training method and how their individual personality relates to training is unknown. The objectives of this study were to determine: 1) the effect of AMS training method on adaptation of primiparous cows to an AMS, 2) whether the personality of a cow affects their adaptation to the AMS, and 3) whether certain personality types adapt better based on the type of training they receive. Forty-eight primiparous Holstein dairy cows, who had not previously been milked by an AMS, were enrolled in the study at ∼85 DIM and were assessed for personality traits using a combined arena test comprised of 3 parts: a novel arena test, a novel object test, and a novel human test. Cows were allocated into 1 of 4 AMS training treatments (n = 12): control (CON; no training), environment exposure only (ENV), environment and AMS concentrate provision (PEL), and environment and mechanics exposure (MEC). Cows in the ENV, PEL, and MEC treatments were subjected to training 4 × /d for 4 d, and then cows from all 4 treatments were milked on the AMS in the evening of the 4th training d. Milking activity and production were recorded for the first 14 d on the AMS. PEL cows had fewer visits to the AMS, fewer milkings, and fewer voluntary milkings compared with CON cows across the 14 d. Cows on all experimental treatments had more fetching events than CON cows, while MEC and ENV treatment cows had a higher milk yield compared with those on the CON treatment. Principal component analysis of the behaviors recorded during the personality assessment revealed 2 factors interpreted as personality traits, "explore-active" and "bold." Across all cows, more "explore-active" cows had greater milk yield. Only the performance of ENV cows was associated with personality; ENV cows who scored low for "explore-active" differed from CON cows, through increased visits and voluntary milkings. Overall, the results demonstrate that providing concentrate on its own during AMS training may not be motivating enough to improve adaptation and performance. However, exposing cows to the mechanics (e.g., the robotic arm and sounds of the AMS) before first milking may improve milk yield. Finally, cow personality may influence the performance of cows trained using less complicated training methods, such as only exposing them to the environment of the AMS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Dairy Science
Journal of Dairy Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
17.10%
发文量
784
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the American Dairy Science Association®, Journal of Dairy Science® (JDS) is the leading peer-reviewed general dairy research journal in the world. JDS readers represent education, industry, and government agencies in more than 70 countries with interests in biochemistry, breeding, economics, engineering, environment, food science, genetics, microbiology, nutrition, pathology, physiology, processing, public health, quality assurance, and sanitation.
期刊最新文献
A longitudinal study of the dynamics of Mycoplasma bovis antibody status in primiparous cows and bulk tank milk in Swedish dairy herds. Assessment of skeletal muscle dynamics and milk production across a 300-day lactation in multiparous dairy cattle. Effect of training method and dairy cow personality traits on adaptation to an automated milking system. Elevated levels of cyclophilin A secreted in milk during bovine mastitis. Formation of bovine serum albumin-galangin nanoparticles and their potential to inhibit ROS-induced inflammation: Enthanol desolvation vs. pH-shiftng method.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1