针对颞下颌关节紊乱症患者的丰塞卡失能指数的波兰语改编和验证。

IF 3.9 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dental and Medical Problems Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.17219/dmp/177287
Małgorzata Gałczyńska-Rusin, Małgorzata Pobudek-Radzikowska, Agata Czajka-Jakubowska
{"title":"针对颞下颌关节紊乱症患者的丰塞卡失能指数的波兰语改编和验证。","authors":"Małgorzata Gałczyńska-Rusin, Małgorzata Pobudek-Radzikowska, Agata Czajka-Jakubowska","doi":"10.17219/dmp/177287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given the notable prevalence of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in the Polish population, there is a clear need for the use of simple, reliable questionnaires as screening tools to facilitate the referral of patients to TMD specialists.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to translate and adapt the Fonseca Anamnestic Index (FAI) into Polish and assess its reliability and validity in identifying TMD symptoms.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The Polish adaptation of the FAI (FAI-PL) was developed in accordance with the international guidelines, including the translation and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the questionnaire. Every patient received a standardized assessment, which involved history taking and clinical examination, including the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) and the FAI questionnaire. The psychometric analyses included an evaluation of the questionnaire's reliability and validity, as well as an exploratory factor analysis (EFA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 122 individuals enrolled in the study, 63.9% were female. The mean age of the participants was 28.1 years (standard deviation (SD): 6.3). According to the RDC/TMD standards, 40.9% of patients had no TMD, while the FAI assessment indicated that 27% of patients had no TMD. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the FAI-PL was 0.75. The exploratory factor analysis revealed 3 factors, accounting for 55.2% of the total variation. The diagnostic sensitivity of the FAI-PL was 98.6%, while the diagnostic specificity reached a level of 65.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Polish version of the FAI is a reliable and valid tool for the screening of TMD symptoms in the Polish-speaking population.</p>","PeriodicalId":11191,"journal":{"name":"Dental and Medical Problems","volume":" ","pages":"705-711"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polish language adaptation and validation of the Fonseca Anamnestic Index for individuals with temporomandibular disorders.\",\"authors\":\"Małgorzata Gałczyńska-Rusin, Małgorzata Pobudek-Radzikowska, Agata Czajka-Jakubowska\",\"doi\":\"10.17219/dmp/177287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given the notable prevalence of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in the Polish population, there is a clear need for the use of simple, reliable questionnaires as screening tools to facilitate the referral of patients to TMD specialists.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to translate and adapt the Fonseca Anamnestic Index (FAI) into Polish and assess its reliability and validity in identifying TMD symptoms.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The Polish adaptation of the FAI (FAI-PL) was developed in accordance with the international guidelines, including the translation and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the questionnaire. Every patient received a standardized assessment, which involved history taking and clinical examination, including the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) and the FAI questionnaire. The psychometric analyses included an evaluation of the questionnaire's reliability and validity, as well as an exploratory factor analysis (EFA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 122 individuals enrolled in the study, 63.9% were female. The mean age of the participants was 28.1 years (standard deviation (SD): 6.3). According to the RDC/TMD standards, 40.9% of patients had no TMD, while the FAI assessment indicated that 27% of patients had no TMD. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the FAI-PL was 0.75. The exploratory factor analysis revealed 3 factors, accounting for 55.2% of the total variation. The diagnostic sensitivity of the FAI-PL was 98.6%, while the diagnostic specificity reached a level of 65.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Polish version of the FAI is a reliable and valid tool for the screening of TMD symptoms in the Polish-speaking population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dental and Medical Problems\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"705-711\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dental and Medical Problems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/177287\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental and Medical Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/177287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:鉴于颞下颌关节紊乱症(TMD)在波兰人口中的显著发病率,显然需要使用简单、可靠的问卷作为筛查工具,以方便将患者转诊至TMD专科医生:本研究旨在将丰塞卡失眠指数(Fonseca Anamnestic Index,FAI)翻译并改编成波兰语,并评估其在识别 TMD 症状方面的可靠性和有效性:FAI 波兰语改编版(FAI-PL)是根据国际指南开发的,包括翻译和评估问卷的心理测量特性。每位患者都接受了标准化评估,包括病史采集和临床检查,包括颞下颌关节紊乱研究诊断标准(RDC/TMD)和 FAI 问卷。心理测量分析包括问卷的信度和效度评估以及探索性因子分析(EFA):在参加研究的 122 人中,63.9% 为女性。参与者的平均年龄为 28.1 岁(标准差(SD):6.3)。根据 RDC/TMD 标准,40.9% 的患者没有 TMD,而 FAI 评估表明 27% 的患者没有 TMD。FAI-PL 的 Cronbach's alpha 系数为 0.75。探索性因子分析显示有 3 个因子,占总变异的 55.2%。FAI-PL的诊断灵敏度为98.6%,诊断特异性为65.3%:结论:波兰语版 FAI 是筛查波兰语人群 TMD 症状的可靠有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Polish language adaptation and validation of the Fonseca Anamnestic Index for individuals with temporomandibular disorders.

Background: Given the notable prevalence of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in the Polish population, there is a clear need for the use of simple, reliable questionnaires as screening tools to facilitate the referral of patients to TMD specialists.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to translate and adapt the Fonseca Anamnestic Index (FAI) into Polish and assess its reliability and validity in identifying TMD symptoms.

Material and methods: The Polish adaptation of the FAI (FAI-PL) was developed in accordance with the international guidelines, including the translation and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the questionnaire. Every patient received a standardized assessment, which involved history taking and clinical examination, including the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) and the FAI questionnaire. The psychometric analyses included an evaluation of the questionnaire's reliability and validity, as well as an exploratory factor analysis (EFA).

Results: Of the 122 individuals enrolled in the study, 63.9% were female. The mean age of the participants was 28.1 years (standard deviation (SD): 6.3). According to the RDC/TMD standards, 40.9% of patients had no TMD, while the FAI assessment indicated that 27% of patients had no TMD. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the FAI-PL was 0.75. The exploratory factor analysis revealed 3 factors, accounting for 55.2% of the total variation. The diagnostic sensitivity of the FAI-PL was 98.6%, while the diagnostic specificity reached a level of 65.3%.

Conclusions: The Polish version of the FAI is a reliable and valid tool for the screening of TMD symptoms in the Polish-speaking population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊最新文献
Oral microbiota diversity and composition in patients with oral lichen planus: An observational molecular analysis study. Characteristics of orofacial function and sleep disorders in children with signs of autism spectrum disorder: A cross-sectional study. Laser therapies as the adjunctive treatment of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: Evidence synthesis and clinical recommendations. Official recommendations of the World Federation for Laser Dentistry (WFLD) and the Polish Society for Laser Dentistry (PTSL). Treatment of multiple gingival recessions, using the modified coronally advanced tunnel technique and subepithelial connective tissue graft with or without 24% EDTA root conditioning: 3- and 5-year outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. Evaluating pheophorbide-a as a photosensitizer in oral cancer photodynamic therapy: A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1