pT1 结直肠癌淋巴结转移的组织学风险因素:粘膜下浸润深度真的重要吗?

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Current Medical Science Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1007/s11596-024-2926-7
Bing Yue, Mei Jia, Rui Xu, Guang-Yong Chen, Mu-Lan Jin
{"title":"pT1 结直肠癌淋巴结转移的组织学风险因素:粘膜下浸润深度真的重要吗?","authors":"Bing Yue, Mei Jia, Rui Xu, Guang-Yong Chen, Mu-Lan Jin","doi":"10.1007/s11596-024-2926-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>After endoscopic resection of colorectal cancer with submucosal invasion (pT1 CRC), additional surgical treatment is recommended if deep submucosal invasion (DSI) is present. This study aimed to further elucidate the risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with pT1 CRC, especially the effect of DSI on LNM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with pT1 CRC who underwent lymph node dissection were selected. The Chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the relationship between clinicopathological characteristics and LNM. The submucosal invasion depth (SID) was measured via 4 methods and analyzed with 3 cut-off values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight of the 239 patients presented with LNM (11.7%), and the independent risk factors for LNM included high histological grade (P=0.003), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (P=0.004), intermediate to high budding (Bd 2/3) (P=0.008), and cancer gland rupture (CGR) (P=0.008). Moreover, the SID, width of submucosal invasion (WSI), and area of submucosal invasion (ASI) were not significantly different. When one, two, three or more risk factors were identified, the LNM rates were 1.1% (1/95), 12.5% (7/56), and 48.8% (20/41), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Indicators such as the SID, WSI, and ASI are not risk factors for LNM and are subjective in their measurement, which renders them relatively inconvenient to apply in clinical practice. In contrast, histological grade, LVI, tumor budding and CGR are relatively straightforward to identify and have been demonstrated to be statistically significant. It would be prudent to focus on these histological factors rather than subjective measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":10820,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Science","volume":" ","pages":"1026-1035"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Histological Risk Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis in pT1 Colorectal Cancer: Does Submucosal Invasion Depth Really Matter?\",\"authors\":\"Bing Yue, Mei Jia, Rui Xu, Guang-Yong Chen, Mu-Lan Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11596-024-2926-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>After endoscopic resection of colorectal cancer with submucosal invasion (pT1 CRC), additional surgical treatment is recommended if deep submucosal invasion (DSI) is present. This study aimed to further elucidate the risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with pT1 CRC, especially the effect of DSI on LNM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with pT1 CRC who underwent lymph node dissection were selected. The Chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the relationship between clinicopathological characteristics and LNM. The submucosal invasion depth (SID) was measured via 4 methods and analyzed with 3 cut-off values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight of the 239 patients presented with LNM (11.7%), and the independent risk factors for LNM included high histological grade (P=0.003), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (P=0.004), intermediate to high budding (Bd 2/3) (P=0.008), and cancer gland rupture (CGR) (P=0.008). Moreover, the SID, width of submucosal invasion (WSI), and area of submucosal invasion (ASI) were not significantly different. When one, two, three or more risk factors were identified, the LNM rates were 1.1% (1/95), 12.5% (7/56), and 48.8% (20/41), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Indicators such as the SID, WSI, and ASI are not risk factors for LNM and are subjective in their measurement, which renders them relatively inconvenient to apply in clinical practice. In contrast, histological grade, LVI, tumor budding and CGR are relatively straightforward to identify and have been demonstrated to be statistically significant. It would be prudent to focus on these histological factors rather than subjective measurements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Medical Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1026-1035\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-024-2926-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11596-024-2926-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:内镜下切除粘膜下侵犯的结直肠癌(pT1 CRC)后,如果出现粘膜下深层侵犯(DSI),则建议进行额外的手术治疗。本研究旨在进一步阐明 pT1 CRC 患者淋巴结转移(LNM)的风险因素,尤其是 DSI 对 LNM 的影响:方法:选择接受淋巴结清扫术的 pT1 CRC 患者。采用卡方检验和多变量逻辑回归分析临床病理特征与 LNM 的关系。粘膜下浸润深度(SID)通过4种方法测量,并以3个截断值进行分析:239例患者中有28例(11.7%)出现LNM,LNM的独立危险因素包括组织学分级高(P=0.003)、淋巴管侵犯(LVI)(P=0.004)、中高出芽(Bd 2/3)(P=0.008)和癌腺破裂(CGR)(P=0.008)。此外,SID、粘膜下浸润宽度(WSI)和粘膜下浸润面积(ASI)没有显著差异。当发现一个、两个、三个或更多风险因素时,LNM率分别为1.1%(1/95)、12.5%(7/56)和48.8%(20/41):结论:SID、WSI 和 ASI 等指标并非 LNM 的危险因素,其测量结果具有主观性,因此在临床实践中应用相对不便。相比之下,组织学分级、LVI、肿瘤萌芽和 CGR 则相对容易识别,而且已被证实具有统计学意义。为了谨慎起见,应将重点放在这些组织学因素上,而不是主观测量上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Histological Risk Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis in pT1 Colorectal Cancer: Does Submucosal Invasion Depth Really Matter?

Objective: After endoscopic resection of colorectal cancer with submucosal invasion (pT1 CRC), additional surgical treatment is recommended if deep submucosal invasion (DSI) is present. This study aimed to further elucidate the risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with pT1 CRC, especially the effect of DSI on LNM.

Methods: Patients with pT1 CRC who underwent lymph node dissection were selected. The Chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze the relationship between clinicopathological characteristics and LNM. The submucosal invasion depth (SID) was measured via 4 methods and analyzed with 3 cut-off values.

Results: Twenty-eight of the 239 patients presented with LNM (11.7%), and the independent risk factors for LNM included high histological grade (P=0.003), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (P=0.004), intermediate to high budding (Bd 2/3) (P=0.008), and cancer gland rupture (CGR) (P=0.008). Moreover, the SID, width of submucosal invasion (WSI), and area of submucosal invasion (ASI) were not significantly different. When one, two, three or more risk factors were identified, the LNM rates were 1.1% (1/95), 12.5% (7/56), and 48.8% (20/41), respectively.

Conclusion: Indicators such as the SID, WSI, and ASI are not risk factors for LNM and are subjective in their measurement, which renders them relatively inconvenient to apply in clinical practice. In contrast, histological grade, LVI, tumor budding and CGR are relatively straightforward to identify and have been demonstrated to be statistically significant. It would be prudent to focus on these histological factors rather than subjective measurements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Medical Science
Current Medical Science Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
126
期刊介绍: Current Medical Science provides a forum for peer-reviewed papers in the medical sciences, to promote academic exchange between Chinese researchers and doctors and their foreign counterparts. The journal covers the subjects of biomedicine such as physiology, biochemistry, molecular biology, pharmacology, pathology and pathophysiology, etc., and clinical research, such as surgery, internal medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics and otorhinolaryngology etc. The articles appearing in Current Medical Science are mainly in English, with a very small number of its papers in German, to pay tribute to its German founder. This journal is the only medical periodical in Western languages sponsored by an educational institution located in the central part of China.
期刊最新文献
Qiliqiangxin Alleviates Imbalance of Inflammatory Cytokines in Patients with Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Brain-computer Interaction in the Smart Era. Contribution of ECT2 to Tubulointerstitial Fibrosis in the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease. Performance Assessment of GPT 4.0 on the Japanese Medical Licensing Examination. Application and Prospects of Deep Learning Technology in Fracture Diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1