Eleni H. Moschonas , Jade A. Steber , Haley E. Capeci , Hailey M. Donald , Vincent J. Vozzella , Rachel A. Bittner , Ellen M. Annas , Piper L. Rennerfeldt , Jeffrey P. Cheng , Corina O. Bondi , Anthony E. Kline
{"title":"术前丰富环境并不能预防脑外伤引起的神经行为障碍。","authors":"Eleni H. Moschonas , Jade A. Steber , Haley E. Capeci , Hailey M. Donald , Vincent J. Vozzella , Rachel A. Bittner , Ellen M. Annas , Piper L. Rennerfeldt , Jeffrey P. Cheng , Corina O. Bondi , Anthony E. Kline","doi":"10.1016/j.expneurol.2024.114990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The robustness of environmental enrichment (EE) in ameliorating neurobehavioral and cognitive deficits after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI) is unequivocal. What is equivocal is whether EE can function as a prophylactic to afford resiliency and neuroprotection against TBI. We hypothesized that pre-operative EE would yield a protective effect against TBI-induced motor, cognitive, and coping deficits, and that further improvements would be conferred when EE is provided before and after TBI. To test the hypotheses, adult male rats received either 4 weeks of EE or standard (STD) housing prior to undergoing a controlled cortical impact of moderate severity (2.8 mm deformation at 4 m/s) or sham injury while under anesthesia. After injury, the rats were randomly assigned to post-operative EE or STD housing. Motor ability, spatial learning, and memory retention were assessed by beam-walk and water maze tests, respectively. Active and passive behavioral coping strategies were evaluated with the shock probe defensive burying (SPDB) test. c-Fos and cortical lesion volume were also quantified. The post-TBI enrichment groups (EE + TBI + EE and STD + TBI + EE) did not differ (<em>p</em> > 0.05) and performed better than the post-TBI STD-housed groups (EE + TBI + STD and STD + TBI + STD) on motor and cognition (<em>p</em> < 0.05). The post-TBI STD groups did not differ, regardless of whether in EE or STD living conditions before injury (<em>p</em> > 0.05). Moreover, both post-TBI enrichment groups performed better in the SPDB test relative to the STD + TBI + STD group (<em>p</em> < 0.05). c-Fos + cells were upregulated in the ipsilateral CA<sub>1</sub> in both pre-injury EE groups relative to the pre-injury STD groups (<em>p</em> < 0.05). No statistical differences were observed in cortical lesion volume among the groups. Overall, these data do not support the hypothesis as no neuroprotective effect was observed with 4 weeks of pre-operative EE and no additional benefit was achieved in the TBI group receiving both pre-and-post EE relative to the TBI group receiving only post-EE. However, the data do reinforce the consistency of post-TBI EE in producing robust neurobehavioral benefits, which further supports this paradigm as a relevant preclinical model of neurorehabilitation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12246,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Neurology","volume":"383 ","pages":"Article 114990"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-operative environmental enrichment does not yield a prophylactic effect against traumatic brain injury-induced neurobehavioral deficits\",\"authors\":\"Eleni H. Moschonas , Jade A. Steber , Haley E. Capeci , Hailey M. Donald , Vincent J. Vozzella , Rachel A. Bittner , Ellen M. Annas , Piper L. Rennerfeldt , Jeffrey P. Cheng , Corina O. Bondi , Anthony E. Kline\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.expneurol.2024.114990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The robustness of environmental enrichment (EE) in ameliorating neurobehavioral and cognitive deficits after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI) is unequivocal. What is equivocal is whether EE can function as a prophylactic to afford resiliency and neuroprotection against TBI. We hypothesized that pre-operative EE would yield a protective effect against TBI-induced motor, cognitive, and coping deficits, and that further improvements would be conferred when EE is provided before and after TBI. To test the hypotheses, adult male rats received either 4 weeks of EE or standard (STD) housing prior to undergoing a controlled cortical impact of moderate severity (2.8 mm deformation at 4 m/s) or sham injury while under anesthesia. After injury, the rats were randomly assigned to post-operative EE or STD housing. Motor ability, spatial learning, and memory retention were assessed by beam-walk and water maze tests, respectively. Active and passive behavioral coping strategies were evaluated with the shock probe defensive burying (SPDB) test. c-Fos and cortical lesion volume were also quantified. The post-TBI enrichment groups (EE + TBI + EE and STD + TBI + EE) did not differ (<em>p</em> > 0.05) and performed better than the post-TBI STD-housed groups (EE + TBI + STD and STD + TBI + STD) on motor and cognition (<em>p</em> < 0.05). The post-TBI STD groups did not differ, regardless of whether in EE or STD living conditions before injury (<em>p</em> > 0.05). Moreover, both post-TBI enrichment groups performed better in the SPDB test relative to the STD + TBI + STD group (<em>p</em> < 0.05). c-Fos + cells were upregulated in the ipsilateral CA<sub>1</sub> in both pre-injury EE groups relative to the pre-injury STD groups (<em>p</em> < 0.05). No statistical differences were observed in cortical lesion volume among the groups. Overall, these data do not support the hypothesis as no neuroprotective effect was observed with 4 weeks of pre-operative EE and no additional benefit was achieved in the TBI group receiving both pre-and-post EE relative to the TBI group receiving only post-EE. However, the data do reinforce the consistency of post-TBI EE in producing robust neurobehavioral benefits, which further supports this paradigm as a relevant preclinical model of neurorehabilitation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Neurology\",\"volume\":\"383 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114990\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014488624003169\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014488624003169","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
丰富环境(EE)在改善实验性创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后的神经行为和认知障碍方面的作用是毋庸置疑的。目前尚不明确的是,EE 能否作为一种预防措施,提供对创伤性脑损伤的恢复能力和神经保护。我们假设,术前 EE 将对 TBI 引起的运动、认知和应对缺陷产生保护作用,而在 TBI 前后提供 EE 将进一步改善这些缺陷。为了验证这些假设,成年雄性大鼠在接受中等严重程度的受控皮层撞击(2.8 毫米变形,4 米/秒)或麻醉状态下的假损伤之前,接受了为期 4 周的 EE 或标准(STD)饲养。受伤后,大鼠被随机分配到术后 EE 或 STD 饲养区。运动能力、空间学习能力和记忆保持能力分别通过横梁行走和水迷宫测试进行评估。此外,还对c-Fos和皮质损伤体积进行了量化。创伤后强化组(EE + TBI + EE 和 STD + TBI + EE)在运动和认知方面与创伤后 STD 居住组(EE + TBI + STD 和 STD + TBI + STD)相比没有差异(P > 0.05),表现更好(P 0.05)。此外,相对于 STD + TBI + STD 组,TBI 后强化组在 SPDB 测试中的表现均优于 STD + TBI + STD 组(相对于受伤前 STD 组,受伤前 EE 组的 p 均为 1(p 0.05))。
Pre-operative environmental enrichment does not yield a prophylactic effect against traumatic brain injury-induced neurobehavioral deficits
The robustness of environmental enrichment (EE) in ameliorating neurobehavioral and cognitive deficits after experimental traumatic brain injury (TBI) is unequivocal. What is equivocal is whether EE can function as a prophylactic to afford resiliency and neuroprotection against TBI. We hypothesized that pre-operative EE would yield a protective effect against TBI-induced motor, cognitive, and coping deficits, and that further improvements would be conferred when EE is provided before and after TBI. To test the hypotheses, adult male rats received either 4 weeks of EE or standard (STD) housing prior to undergoing a controlled cortical impact of moderate severity (2.8 mm deformation at 4 m/s) or sham injury while under anesthesia. After injury, the rats were randomly assigned to post-operative EE or STD housing. Motor ability, spatial learning, and memory retention were assessed by beam-walk and water maze tests, respectively. Active and passive behavioral coping strategies were evaluated with the shock probe defensive burying (SPDB) test. c-Fos and cortical lesion volume were also quantified. The post-TBI enrichment groups (EE + TBI + EE and STD + TBI + EE) did not differ (p > 0.05) and performed better than the post-TBI STD-housed groups (EE + TBI + STD and STD + TBI + STD) on motor and cognition (p < 0.05). The post-TBI STD groups did not differ, regardless of whether in EE or STD living conditions before injury (p > 0.05). Moreover, both post-TBI enrichment groups performed better in the SPDB test relative to the STD + TBI + STD group (p < 0.05). c-Fos + cells were upregulated in the ipsilateral CA1 in both pre-injury EE groups relative to the pre-injury STD groups (p < 0.05). No statistical differences were observed in cortical lesion volume among the groups. Overall, these data do not support the hypothesis as no neuroprotective effect was observed with 4 weeks of pre-operative EE and no additional benefit was achieved in the TBI group receiving both pre-and-post EE relative to the TBI group receiving only post-EE. However, the data do reinforce the consistency of post-TBI EE in producing robust neurobehavioral benefits, which further supports this paradigm as a relevant preclinical model of neurorehabilitation.
期刊介绍:
Experimental Neurology, a Journal of Neuroscience Research, publishes original research in neuroscience with a particular emphasis on novel findings in neural development, regeneration, plasticity and transplantation. The journal has focused on research concerning basic mechanisms underlying neurological disorders.