iStent 注射与白内障手术的纵向疗效对比:来自抗击青光眼致盲登记处的真实世界数据。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of cataract and refractive surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001567
Colin I Clement, Vuong Nguyen, Frank Howes, Jenny Danks, Vincent Lee, David Wechsler, Emily Gregory-Roberts, Mark Gillies, Mitchell Lawlor
{"title":"iStent 注射与白内障手术的纵向疗效对比:来自抗击青光眼致盲登记处的真实世界数据。","authors":"Colin I Clement, Vuong Nguyen, Frank Howes, Jenny Danks, Vincent Lee, David Wechsler, Emily Gregory-Roberts, Mark Gillies, Mitchell Lawlor","doi":"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare combined phacoemulsification and iStent inject with phacoemulsification alone.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Fight Glaucoma Blindness (FGB) registry, Sydney, Australia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective observational registry study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eyes that had combined phacoemulsification with iStent inject (iStent group), n = 1257 were compared with eyes that had phacoemulsification only (cataract alone, n = 163). The primary outcome was percentage of eyes achieving >20% intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction from baseline 12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included mean IOP and medication reduction, adverse events, and secondary procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 12 months, the percentage of eyes achieving >20% reduction of IOP was significantly higher in the iStent group compared with the cataract-alone group (40.9% vs 30.1% P < .001). Adverse events occurred at a low rate in both groups, and secondary IOP-lowering procedures were significantly less frequent in the iStent group compared with cataract alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Real-world outcomes from the FGB registry at 12 months show that phacoemulsification combined with iStent inject has a higher efficacy and reduced need for secondary IOP-lowering surgery compared with phacoemulsification alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":15214,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"113-118"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Longitudinal outcomes of iStent inject with cataract surgery compared with cataract surgery alone: real-world data from the Fight Glaucoma Blindness registry.\",\"authors\":\"Colin I Clement, Vuong Nguyen, Frank Howes, Jenny Danks, Vincent Lee, David Wechsler, Emily Gregory-Roberts, Mark Gillies, Mitchell Lawlor\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001567\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare combined phacoemulsification and iStent inject with phacoemulsification alone.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Fight Glaucoma Blindness (FGB) registry, Sydney, Australia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective observational registry study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eyes that had combined phacoemulsification with iStent inject (iStent group), n = 1257 were compared with eyes that had phacoemulsification only (cataract alone, n = 163). The primary outcome was percentage of eyes achieving >20% intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction from baseline 12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included mean IOP and medication reduction, adverse events, and secondary procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 12 months, the percentage of eyes achieving >20% reduction of IOP was significantly higher in the iStent group compared with the cataract-alone group (40.9% vs 30.1% P < .001). Adverse events occurred at a low rate in both groups, and secondary IOP-lowering procedures were significantly less frequent in the iStent group compared with cataract alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Real-world outcomes from the FGB registry at 12 months show that phacoemulsification combined with iStent inject has a higher efficacy and reduced need for secondary IOP-lowering surgery compared with phacoemulsification alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"113-118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001567\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cataract and refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001567","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较联合超声乳化和注射 iStent 与单纯超声乳化:澳大利亚抗击青光眼致盲(FGB)登记处:前瞻性观察登记研究:将接受联合超声乳化术和 iStent 注入术的眼睛(iStent 组)与只接受超声乳化术的眼睛(单纯白内障组)进行比较。主要结果是术后 12 个月眼压较基线降低 20% 以上的眼球百分比。次要结果包括平均眼压和药物减量、不良事件和二次手术:结果:与单纯白内障组相比,iStent 组 12 个月后眼压降低 >20% 的比例明显更高(40.9% 对 30.1%):FGB 登记 12 个月的实际结果显示,与单纯超声乳化术相比,超声乳化术联合注射 iStent 的疗效更高,二次降低眼压手术的需求也更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Longitudinal outcomes of iStent inject with cataract surgery compared with cataract surgery alone: real-world data from the Fight Glaucoma Blindness registry.

Purpose: To compare combined phacoemulsification and iStent inject with phacoemulsification alone.

Setting: Fight Glaucoma Blindness (FGB) registry, Sydney, Australia.

Design: Prospective observational registry study.

Methods: Eyes that had combined phacoemulsification with iStent inject (iStent group), n = 1257 were compared with eyes that had phacoemulsification only (cataract alone, n = 163). The primary outcome was percentage of eyes achieving >20% intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction from baseline 12 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included mean IOP and medication reduction, adverse events, and secondary procedures.

Results: At 12 months, the percentage of eyes achieving >20% reduction of IOP was significantly higher in the iStent group compared with the cataract-alone group (40.9% vs 30.1% P < .001). Adverse events occurred at a low rate in both groups, and secondary IOP-lowering procedures were significantly less frequent in the iStent group compared with cataract alone.

Conclusions: Real-world outcomes from the FGB registry at 12 months show that phacoemulsification combined with iStent inject has a higher efficacy and reduced need for secondary IOP-lowering surgery compared with phacoemulsification alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
259
审稿时长
8.5 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (JCRS), a preeminent peer-reviewed monthly ophthalmology publication, is the official journal of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). JCRS publishes high quality articles on all aspects of anterior segment surgery. In addition to original clinical studies, the journal features a consultation section, practical techniques, important cases, and reviews as well as basic science articles.
期刊最新文献
Comparing visual outcomes of keratorefractive lenticule extraction, PRK, and LASIK procedures in the military population. Endophthalmitis rates after secondary intraocular lens surgeries: 11-year Medicare fee-for-service analysis. Longitudinal outcomes of iStent inject with cataract surgery compared with cataract surgery alone: real-world data from the Fight Glaucoma Blindness registry. Comparison of intraocular lens power formulas for negative diopter intraocular lens implantation for high myopia. Virtual follow-up after cataract surgery: systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1