12 岁以下儿童中度至重度特应性皮炎系统疗法的实际治疗效果:PEDISTAD 的两年结果。

IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jaad.2024.09.046
Amy S. Paller MD , Marjolein de Bruin-Weller MD , Danielle Marcoux MD , Eulalia Baselga MD , Vania Oliveira de Carvalho MD , Ledit R.F. Ardusso MD , Suzanne G.M.A. Pasmans MD , Mirna Toledo-Bahena MD, MSc , Cory Rubin MD , Joel C. Joyce MD , Lara Wine Lee MD, PhD , Bryan Adams PhD , Rajan Gupta PhD , Marius Ardeleanu MD , Annie Zhang MD
{"title":"12 岁以下儿童中度至重度特应性皮炎系统疗法的实际治疗效果:PEDISTAD 的两年结果。","authors":"Amy S. Paller MD ,&nbsp;Marjolein de Bruin-Weller MD ,&nbsp;Danielle Marcoux MD ,&nbsp;Eulalia Baselga MD ,&nbsp;Vania Oliveira de Carvalho MD ,&nbsp;Ledit R.F. Ardusso MD ,&nbsp;Suzanne G.M.A. Pasmans MD ,&nbsp;Mirna Toledo-Bahena MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Cory Rubin MD ,&nbsp;Joel C. Joyce MD ,&nbsp;Lara Wine Lee MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Bryan Adams PhD ,&nbsp;Rajan Gupta PhD ,&nbsp;Marius Ardeleanu MD ,&nbsp;Annie Zhang MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaad.2024.09.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The arrival of biologics and small-molecule therapies (eg Janus kinase inhibitors) changed atopic dermatitis treatment, but older systemic treatments continue to be prescribed.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To provide real-world effectiveness, safety, and adherence data for dupilumab, cyclosporine, and methotrexate.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PEDIatric STudy in Atopic Dermatitis (NCT03687359) is a real-world, prospective, observational, 10-year study of children (&lt;12 years) with inadequately controlled moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. We report 2-year interim results.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Median treatment durations were 8.1, 13.0, and 10.7 months for dupilumab (<em>n</em> = 144), methotrexate (<em>n</em> = 114), and cyclosporine (<em>n</em> = 121), respectively. Dupilumab had numerically greater within-group improvements than methotrexate and cyclosporine in Eczema Area and Severity Index (−12.4∗ vs −5.7∗ and −3.3); body surface area affected (−19.9%∗ vs −11.8%∗ and −8.8%∗); itching (night-time: −2.1∗ vs −0.4 and + 0.1; daytime: −1.5∗ vs +0.1 and + 0.2; ≥6 years); itching/scratching (−3.6∗ vs −1.4∗ and −0.2; &lt;6 years); and Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (−7.0∗ vs −4.7∗ and −1.5) (∗<em>P</em> &lt; .05 within-group improvements from baseline). Dupilumab had less discontinuations (8.3% vs 28.9% and 43.0%) and adverse event(s) (18.1% vs 29.8% and 31.4%).</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>No randomization, placebo, or specified dosages.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Dupilumab was associated with numerically greater outcomes and higher adherence than cyclosporine or methotrexate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology","volume":"92 2","pages":"Pages 242-251"},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world treatment outcomes of systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in children aged less than 12 years: 2-year results from PEDIatric STudy in Atopic Dermatitis\",\"authors\":\"Amy S. Paller MD ,&nbsp;Marjolein de Bruin-Weller MD ,&nbsp;Danielle Marcoux MD ,&nbsp;Eulalia Baselga MD ,&nbsp;Vania Oliveira de Carvalho MD ,&nbsp;Ledit R.F. Ardusso MD ,&nbsp;Suzanne G.M.A. Pasmans MD ,&nbsp;Mirna Toledo-Bahena MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Cory Rubin MD ,&nbsp;Joel C. Joyce MD ,&nbsp;Lara Wine Lee MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Bryan Adams PhD ,&nbsp;Rajan Gupta PhD ,&nbsp;Marius Ardeleanu MD ,&nbsp;Annie Zhang MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaad.2024.09.046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The arrival of biologics and small-molecule therapies (eg Janus kinase inhibitors) changed atopic dermatitis treatment, but older systemic treatments continue to be prescribed.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To provide real-world effectiveness, safety, and adherence data for dupilumab, cyclosporine, and methotrexate.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PEDIatric STudy in Atopic Dermatitis (NCT03687359) is a real-world, prospective, observational, 10-year study of children (&lt;12 years) with inadequately controlled moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. We report 2-year interim results.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Median treatment durations were 8.1, 13.0, and 10.7 months for dupilumab (<em>n</em> = 144), methotrexate (<em>n</em> = 114), and cyclosporine (<em>n</em> = 121), respectively. Dupilumab had numerically greater within-group improvements than methotrexate and cyclosporine in Eczema Area and Severity Index (−12.4∗ vs −5.7∗ and −3.3); body surface area affected (−19.9%∗ vs −11.8%∗ and −8.8%∗); itching (night-time: −2.1∗ vs −0.4 and + 0.1; daytime: −1.5∗ vs +0.1 and + 0.2; ≥6 years); itching/scratching (−3.6∗ vs −1.4∗ and −0.2; &lt;6 years); and Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (−7.0∗ vs −4.7∗ and −1.5) (∗<em>P</em> &lt; .05 within-group improvements from baseline). Dupilumab had less discontinuations (8.3% vs 28.9% and 43.0%) and adverse event(s) (18.1% vs 29.8% and 31.4%).</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>No randomization, placebo, or specified dosages.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Dupilumab was associated with numerically greater outcomes and higher adherence than cyclosporine or methotrexate.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology\",\"volume\":\"92 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 242-251\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190962224029190\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190962224029190","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:生物制剂和小分子疗法(如Janus激酶抑制剂)的出现改变了特应性皮炎(AD)的治疗方法,但旧的系统治疗方法仍在使用:目的:提供杜必鲁单抗、环孢素和甲氨蝶呤的实际有效性、安全性和依从性数据:PEDISTAD (NCT03687359)是一项针对儿童的真实世界、前瞻性、观察性、为期10年的研究:杜比鲁单抗(144 例)、甲氨蝶呤(114 例)和环孢素(121 例)的中位治疗时间分别为 8.1、13.0 和 10.7 个月。在湿疹面积和严重程度指数(-12.4* vs -5.7* 和-3.3)、受影响体表面积(-19.9%* vs -11.8%* 和 -8.8%*);瘙痒(夜间:-2.1* vs -0.4 和 +0.1;白天:-1.5* vs +0.1 和 +0.2;≥6 岁);瘙痒/抓挠(-3.6* vs -1.4* 和 -0.2;局限性:结论:杜匹单抗与瘙痒/搔痒(-3.6* vs -1.4* 和-0.2;局限性:无随机分组、安慰剂或指定剂量)相关:结论:与环孢素或甲氨蝶呤相比,杜比鲁单抗具有更高的疗效和更高的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Real-world treatment outcomes of systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in children aged less than 12 years: 2-year results from PEDIatric STudy in Atopic Dermatitis

Background

The arrival of biologics and small-molecule therapies (eg Janus kinase inhibitors) changed atopic dermatitis treatment, but older systemic treatments continue to be prescribed.

Objective

To provide real-world effectiveness, safety, and adherence data for dupilumab, cyclosporine, and methotrexate.

Methods

PEDIatric STudy in Atopic Dermatitis (NCT03687359) is a real-world, prospective, observational, 10-year study of children (<12 years) with inadequately controlled moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. We report 2-year interim results.

Results

Median treatment durations were 8.1, 13.0, and 10.7 months for dupilumab (n = 144), methotrexate (n = 114), and cyclosporine (n = 121), respectively. Dupilumab had numerically greater within-group improvements than methotrexate and cyclosporine in Eczema Area and Severity Index (−12.4∗ vs −5.7∗ and −3.3); body surface area affected (−19.9%∗ vs −11.8%∗ and −8.8%∗); itching (night-time: −2.1∗ vs −0.4 and + 0.1; daytime: −1.5∗ vs +0.1 and + 0.2; ≥6 years); itching/scratching (−3.6∗ vs −1.4∗ and −0.2; <6 years); and Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (−7.0∗ vs −4.7∗ and −1.5) (∗P < .05 within-group improvements from baseline). Dupilumab had less discontinuations (8.3% vs 28.9% and 43.0%) and adverse event(s) (18.1% vs 29.8% and 31.4%).

Limitations

No randomization, placebo, or specified dosages.

Conclusion

Dupilumab was associated with numerically greater outcomes and higher adherence than cyclosporine or methotrexate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
5.80%
发文量
2023
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (JAAD) is the official scientific publication of the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD). Its primary goal is to cater to the educational requirements of the dermatology community. Being the top journal in the field, JAAD publishes original articles that have undergone peer review. These articles primarily focus on clinical, investigative, and population-based studies related to dermatology. Another key area of emphasis is research on healthcare delivery and quality of care. JAAD also highlights high-quality, cost-effective, and innovative treatments within the field. In addition to this, the journal covers new diagnostic techniques and various other topics relevant to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of skin, hair, and nail disorders.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Table of Contents Information for Readers JAAD Case Reports Article List Journal Based CME Instructions and Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1