Amy S. Paller MD , Marjolein de Bruin-Weller MD , Danielle Marcoux MD , Eulalia Baselga MD , Vania Oliveira de Carvalho MD , Ledit R.F. Ardusso MD , Suzanne G.M.A. Pasmans MD , Mirna Toledo-Bahena MD, MSc , Cory Rubin MD , Joel C. Joyce MD , Lara Wine Lee MD, PhD , Bryan Adams PhD , Rajan Gupta PhD , Marius Ardeleanu MD , Annie Zhang MD
{"title":"12 岁以下儿童中度至重度特应性皮炎系统疗法的实际治疗效果:PEDISTAD 的两年结果。","authors":"Amy S. Paller MD , Marjolein de Bruin-Weller MD , Danielle Marcoux MD , Eulalia Baselga MD , Vania Oliveira de Carvalho MD , Ledit R.F. Ardusso MD , Suzanne G.M.A. Pasmans MD , Mirna Toledo-Bahena MD, MSc , Cory Rubin MD , Joel C. Joyce MD , Lara Wine Lee MD, PhD , Bryan Adams PhD , Rajan Gupta PhD , Marius Ardeleanu MD , Annie Zhang MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jaad.2024.09.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The arrival of biologics and small-molecule therapies (eg Janus kinase inhibitors) changed atopic dermatitis treatment, but older systemic treatments continue to be prescribed.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To provide real-world effectiveness, safety, and adherence data for dupilumab, cyclosporine, and methotrexate.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PEDIatric STudy in Atopic Dermatitis (NCT03687359) is a real-world, prospective, observational, 10-year study of children (<12 years) with inadequately controlled moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. We report 2-year interim results.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Median treatment durations were 8.1, 13.0, and 10.7 months for dupilumab (<em>n</em> = 144), methotrexate (<em>n</em> = 114), and cyclosporine (<em>n</em> = 121), respectively. Dupilumab had numerically greater within-group improvements than methotrexate and cyclosporine in Eczema Area and Severity Index (−12.4∗ vs −5.7∗ and −3.3); body surface area affected (−19.9%∗ vs −11.8%∗ and −8.8%∗); itching (night-time: −2.1∗ vs −0.4 and + 0.1; daytime: −1.5∗ vs +0.1 and + 0.2; ≥6 years); itching/scratching (−3.6∗ vs −1.4∗ and −0.2; <6 years); and Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (−7.0∗ vs −4.7∗ and −1.5) (∗<em>P</em> < .05 within-group improvements from baseline). Dupilumab had less discontinuations (8.3% vs 28.9% and 43.0%) and adverse event(s) (18.1% vs 29.8% and 31.4%).</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>No randomization, placebo, or specified dosages.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Dupilumab was associated with numerically greater outcomes and higher adherence than cyclosporine or methotrexate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology","volume":"92 2","pages":"Pages 242-251"},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world treatment outcomes of systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in children aged less than 12 years: 2-year results from PEDIatric STudy in Atopic Dermatitis\",\"authors\":\"Amy S. Paller MD , Marjolein de Bruin-Weller MD , Danielle Marcoux MD , Eulalia Baselga MD , Vania Oliveira de Carvalho MD , Ledit R.F. Ardusso MD , Suzanne G.M.A. Pasmans MD , Mirna Toledo-Bahena MD, MSc , Cory Rubin MD , Joel C. Joyce MD , Lara Wine Lee MD, PhD , Bryan Adams PhD , Rajan Gupta PhD , Marius Ardeleanu MD , Annie Zhang MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaad.2024.09.046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The arrival of biologics and small-molecule therapies (eg Janus kinase inhibitors) changed atopic dermatitis treatment, but older systemic treatments continue to be prescribed.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To provide real-world effectiveness, safety, and adherence data for dupilumab, cyclosporine, and methotrexate.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PEDIatric STudy in Atopic Dermatitis (NCT03687359) is a real-world, prospective, observational, 10-year study of children (<12 years) with inadequately controlled moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. We report 2-year interim results.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Median treatment durations were 8.1, 13.0, and 10.7 months for dupilumab (<em>n</em> = 144), methotrexate (<em>n</em> = 114), and cyclosporine (<em>n</em> = 121), respectively. Dupilumab had numerically greater within-group improvements than methotrexate and cyclosporine in Eczema Area and Severity Index (−12.4∗ vs −5.7∗ and −3.3); body surface area affected (−19.9%∗ vs −11.8%∗ and −8.8%∗); itching (night-time: −2.1∗ vs −0.4 and + 0.1; daytime: −1.5∗ vs +0.1 and + 0.2; ≥6 years); itching/scratching (−3.6∗ vs −1.4∗ and −0.2; <6 years); and Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (−7.0∗ vs −4.7∗ and −1.5) (∗<em>P</em> < .05 within-group improvements from baseline). Dupilumab had less discontinuations (8.3% vs 28.9% and 43.0%) and adverse event(s) (18.1% vs 29.8% and 31.4%).</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>No randomization, placebo, or specified dosages.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Dupilumab was associated with numerically greater outcomes and higher adherence than cyclosporine or methotrexate.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology\",\"volume\":\"92 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 242-251\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190962224029190\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190962224029190","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:生物制剂和小分子疗法(如Janus激酶抑制剂)的出现改变了特应性皮炎(AD)的治疗方法,但旧的系统治疗方法仍在使用:目的:提供杜必鲁单抗、环孢素和甲氨蝶呤的实际有效性、安全性和依从性数据:PEDISTAD (NCT03687359)是一项针对儿童的真实世界、前瞻性、观察性、为期10年的研究:杜比鲁单抗(144 例)、甲氨蝶呤(114 例)和环孢素(121 例)的中位治疗时间分别为 8.1、13.0 和 10.7 个月。在湿疹面积和严重程度指数(-12.4* vs -5.7* 和-3.3)、受影响体表面积(-19.9%* vs -11.8%* 和 -8.8%*);瘙痒(夜间:-2.1* vs -0.4 和 +0.1;白天:-1.5* vs +0.1 和 +0.2;≥6 岁);瘙痒/抓挠(-3.6* vs -1.4* 和 -0.2;局限性:结论:杜匹单抗与瘙痒/搔痒(-3.6* vs -1.4* 和-0.2;局限性:无随机分组、安慰剂或指定剂量)相关:结论:与环孢素或甲氨蝶呤相比,杜比鲁单抗具有更高的疗效和更高的依从性。
Real-world treatment outcomes of systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in children aged less than 12 years: 2-year results from PEDIatric STudy in Atopic Dermatitis
Background
The arrival of biologics and small-molecule therapies (eg Janus kinase inhibitors) changed atopic dermatitis treatment, but older systemic treatments continue to be prescribed.
Objective
To provide real-world effectiveness, safety, and adherence data for dupilumab, cyclosporine, and methotrexate.
Methods
PEDIatric STudy in Atopic Dermatitis (NCT03687359) is a real-world, prospective, observational, 10-year study of children (<12 years) with inadequately controlled moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. We report 2-year interim results.
Results
Median treatment durations were 8.1, 13.0, and 10.7 months for dupilumab (n = 144), methotrexate (n = 114), and cyclosporine (n = 121), respectively. Dupilumab had numerically greater within-group improvements than methotrexate and cyclosporine in Eczema Area and Severity Index (−12.4∗ vs −5.7∗ and −3.3); body surface area affected (−19.9%∗ vs −11.8%∗ and −8.8%∗); itching (night-time: −2.1∗ vs −0.4 and + 0.1; daytime: −1.5∗ vs +0.1 and + 0.2; ≥6 years); itching/scratching (−3.6∗ vs −1.4∗ and −0.2; <6 years); and Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (−7.0∗ vs −4.7∗ and −1.5) (∗P < .05 within-group improvements from baseline). Dupilumab had less discontinuations (8.3% vs 28.9% and 43.0%) and adverse event(s) (18.1% vs 29.8% and 31.4%).
Limitations
No randomization, placebo, or specified dosages.
Conclusion
Dupilumab was associated with numerically greater outcomes and higher adherence than cyclosporine or methotrexate.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (JAAD) is the official scientific publication of the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD). Its primary goal is to cater to the educational requirements of the dermatology community. Being the top journal in the field, JAAD publishes original articles that have undergone peer review. These articles primarily focus on clinical, investigative, and population-based studies related to dermatology. Another key area of emphasis is research on healthcare delivery and quality of care. JAAD also highlights high-quality, cost-effective, and innovative treatments within the field. In addition to this, the journal covers new diagnostic techniques and various other topics relevant to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of skin, hair, and nail disorders.