无论辅助治疗与否,接受新辅助化疗免疫疗法的可切除NSCLC患者在完全或主要病理反应后的无事件生存期均有所改善:一项系统综述和个体患者数据荟萃分析。

IF 21 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Journal of Thoracic Oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jtho.2024.09.1443
Daniele Marinelli, Antonio Nuccio, Alessandro Di Federico, Francesca Ambrosi, Pietro Bertoglio, Eleonora Faccioli, Roberto Ferrara, Alessandra Ferro, Raffaele Giusti, Francesco Guerrera, Marco Mammana, Alessandra Pittaro, Matteo Sepulcri, Giuseppe Viscardi, Filippo Tommaso Gallina
{"title":"无论辅助治疗与否,接受新辅助化疗免疫疗法的可切除NSCLC患者在完全或主要病理反应后的无事件生存期均有所改善:一项系统综述和个体患者数据荟萃分析。","authors":"Daniele Marinelli, Antonio Nuccio, Alessandro Di Federico, Francesca Ambrosi, Pietro Bertoglio, Eleonora Faccioli, Roberto Ferrara, Alessandra Ferro, Raffaele Giusti, Francesco Guerrera, Marco Mammana, Alessandra Pittaro, Matteo Sepulcri, Giuseppe Viscardi, Filippo Tommaso Gallina","doi":"10.1016/j.jtho.2024.09.1443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy has reshaped the treatment landscape for resectable NSCLC, yet the prognostic significance of pathologic response remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of achieving pathologic complete response (pCR) or major pathologic response (MPR) on event-free survival (EFS) and assessed the influence of adjuvant immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an IPD meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials on neoadjuvant or perioperative anti-programmed death-ligand 1 in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with resectable NSCLC. The IPD was extracted from Kaplan-Meier curves for pCR and MPR from the included studies. Survival outcomes were compared between patients achieving pCR or MPR and those who did not, considering both intention-to-treat and resected populations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Achieving pCR or MPR was associated with improved EFS in the intention-to-treat population (pCR, hazard ratio = 0.13; MPR, hazard ratio = 0.18, respectively) with a 24 months EFS rate of 94% and 88% for patients who achieved pCR and MPR, respectively. Independently from pCR status, patients who were treated in an experimental arm that included adjuvant immunotherapy had similar EFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study reported a strong EFS improvement in patients who achieved either pCR or MPR after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. The use of adjuvant immunotherapy after tumor resection was not associated with improved EFS.</p>","PeriodicalId":17515,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":21.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improved Event-Free Survival After Complete or Major Pathologic Response in Patients With Resectable NSCLC Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy Regardless of Adjuvant Treatment: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Daniele Marinelli, Antonio Nuccio, Alessandro Di Federico, Francesca Ambrosi, Pietro Bertoglio, Eleonora Faccioli, Roberto Ferrara, Alessandra Ferro, Raffaele Giusti, Francesco Guerrera, Marco Mammana, Alessandra Pittaro, Matteo Sepulcri, Giuseppe Viscardi, Filippo Tommaso Gallina\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtho.2024.09.1443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy has reshaped the treatment landscape for resectable NSCLC, yet the prognostic significance of pathologic response remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of achieving pathologic complete response (pCR) or major pathologic response (MPR) on event-free survival (EFS) and assessed the influence of adjuvant immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an IPD meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials on neoadjuvant or perioperative anti-programmed death-ligand 1 in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with resectable NSCLC. The IPD was extracted from Kaplan-Meier curves for pCR and MPR from the included studies. Survival outcomes were compared between patients achieving pCR or MPR and those who did not, considering both intention-to-treat and resected populations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Achieving pCR or MPR was associated with improved EFS in the intention-to-treat population (pCR, hazard ratio = 0.13; MPR, hazard ratio = 0.18, respectively) with a 24 months EFS rate of 94% and 88% for patients who achieved pCR and MPR, respectively. Independently from pCR status, patients who were treated in an experimental arm that included adjuvant immunotherapy had similar EFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study reported a strong EFS improvement in patients who achieved either pCR or MPR after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. The use of adjuvant immunotherapy after tumor resection was not associated with improved EFS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thoracic Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":21.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thoracic Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2024.09.1443\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2024.09.1443","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新辅助化疗免疫疗法重塑了可切除NSCLC的治疗格局,但病理反应的预后意义仍不明确。我们进行了一项系统回顾和个体患者数据(IPD)荟萃分析,以评估达到pCR或MPR对EFS的影响,并评估辅助免疫疗法的影响:我们对可切除NSCLC患者新辅助或围手术期抗PD-(L)1联合铂类化疗的前瞻性临床试验进行了IPD荟萃分析。IPD是从纳入研究的pCR和/或MPR的Kaplan-Meier曲线中提取的。考虑到意向治疗人群(ITT)和切除人群,比较了获得 pCR 或 MPR 患者与未获得 pCR 或 MPR 患者的生存结果:结果:在ITT人群中,获得pCR或MPR与EFS的改善有关(pCR,HR分别为0.13;MPR,HR为0.18),获得pCR和MPR的患者24个月的EFS率分别为94%和88%。与pCR状态无关,接受包括辅助免疫疗法的实验组治疗的患者的EFS相似:结论:我们的研究显示,新辅助化疗免疫疗法后获得 pCR 或 MPR 的患者的 EFS 有明显改善。肿瘤切除后使用辅助免疫疗法与EFS的改善无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improved Event-Free Survival After Complete or Major Pathologic Response in Patients With Resectable NSCLC Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy Regardless of Adjuvant Treatment: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.

Introduction: Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy has reshaped the treatment landscape for resectable NSCLC, yet the prognostic significance of pathologic response remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of achieving pathologic complete response (pCR) or major pathologic response (MPR) on event-free survival (EFS) and assessed the influence of adjuvant immunotherapy.

Methods: We performed an IPD meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials on neoadjuvant or perioperative anti-programmed death-ligand 1 in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with resectable NSCLC. The IPD was extracted from Kaplan-Meier curves for pCR and MPR from the included studies. Survival outcomes were compared between patients achieving pCR or MPR and those who did not, considering both intention-to-treat and resected populations.

Results: Achieving pCR or MPR was associated with improved EFS in the intention-to-treat population (pCR, hazard ratio = 0.13; MPR, hazard ratio = 0.18, respectively) with a 24 months EFS rate of 94% and 88% for patients who achieved pCR and MPR, respectively. Independently from pCR status, patients who were treated in an experimental arm that included adjuvant immunotherapy had similar EFS.

Conclusions: Our study reported a strong EFS improvement in patients who achieved either pCR or MPR after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. The use of adjuvant immunotherapy after tumor resection was not associated with improved EFS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Journal of Thoracic Oncology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
36.00
自引率
3.90%
发文量
1406
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Thoracic Oncology (JTO), the official journal of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer,is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to the prevention, detection, diagnosis, and treatment of all thoracic malignancies.The readship includes epidemiologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, thoracic surgeons, pulmonologists, radiologists, pathologists, nuclear medicine physicians, and research scientists with a special interest in thoracic oncology.
期刊最新文献
Brief Report: Final overall survival and long-term safety of lorlatinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer from the pivotal phase 2 study. Identification of defined molecular subgroups based on immunohistochemical analyses and potential therapeutic vulnerabilities of pulmonary carcinoids. Low dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in Tuberculosis endemic countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Polygenic risk score and lung adenocarcinoma risk among never-smokers by EGFR mutation status-a brief report. Differentiating separate primary lung adenocarcinomas from intrapulmonary metastases with emphasis on pathological and molecular considerations: Recommendations from the IASLC Pathology Committee.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1