代谢和减肥手术后的长期减肥和护理效果:克利夫兰诊所行为评级系统评估》。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Obesity Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1007/s11695-024-07425-9
Anne Jacobs, Karlijn Vermeer, Anna N Slok, Ignace M C Janssen, Rob A E M Tollenaar, Valerie M Monpellier
{"title":"代谢和减肥手术后的长期减肥和护理效果:克利夫兰诊所行为评级系统评估》。","authors":"Anne Jacobs, Karlijn Vermeer, Anna N Slok, Ignace M C Janssen, Rob A E M Tollenaar, Valerie M Monpellier","doi":"10.1007/s11695-024-07425-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Interdisciplinary guidelines recommend preoperative psychological evaluation before metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS). The Cleveland Clinic Behavioral Rating System (CCBRS) has been developed to evaluate the psychological state of individuals undergoing MBS. However, its predictive value concerning long-term weight loss and follow-up attendance has not been extensively studied. This study aims to assess the predictive value of the CCBRS regarding weight loss and follow-up attendance up to 5 years after MBS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cohort study (n = 1236), psychologists administered the CCBRS to each patient prior to MBS in addition to the standard psychosocial-behavioral screening. The CCBRS consists of nine psychological domains and is scored on a five-point Likert scale, from \"poor\" to \"excellent.\" Linear mixed models and ordinal regression analysis were used to analyze the percentage total weight loss over time and follow-up attendance up to 5 years after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1086 patients underwent subsequent MBS. Significant differences in weight loss and follow-up attendance were observed between some CCBRS groups compared to the reference group \"excellent.\" However, these differences were not consistent across all groups within any given domain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this cohort, the predictive value of the CCBRS for weight loss and follow-up attendance up to 5 years after MBS was limited. It is important to consider certain limitations, such as considerable loss to follow-up. Nevertheless, the CCBRS remains valuable for structured psychological assessments by helping to identify patients' strengths and areas needing improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11541249/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Weight Loss and Attendance Outcomes Following Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: An Evaluation of The Cleveland Clinic Behavioral Rating System.\",\"authors\":\"Anne Jacobs, Karlijn Vermeer, Anna N Slok, Ignace M C Janssen, Rob A E M Tollenaar, Valerie M Monpellier\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11695-024-07425-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Interdisciplinary guidelines recommend preoperative psychological evaluation before metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS). The Cleveland Clinic Behavioral Rating System (CCBRS) has been developed to evaluate the psychological state of individuals undergoing MBS. However, its predictive value concerning long-term weight loss and follow-up attendance has not been extensively studied. This study aims to assess the predictive value of the CCBRS regarding weight loss and follow-up attendance up to 5 years after MBS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cohort study (n = 1236), psychologists administered the CCBRS to each patient prior to MBS in addition to the standard psychosocial-behavioral screening. The CCBRS consists of nine psychological domains and is scored on a five-point Likert scale, from \\\"poor\\\" to \\\"excellent.\\\" Linear mixed models and ordinal regression analysis were used to analyze the percentage total weight loss over time and follow-up attendance up to 5 years after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1086 patients underwent subsequent MBS. Significant differences in weight loss and follow-up attendance were observed between some CCBRS groups compared to the reference group \\\"excellent.\\\" However, these differences were not consistent across all groups within any given domain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this cohort, the predictive value of the CCBRS for weight loss and follow-up attendance up to 5 years after MBS was limited. It is important to consider certain limitations, such as considerable loss to follow-up. Nevertheless, the CCBRS remains valuable for structured psychological assessments by helping to identify patients' strengths and areas needing improvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11541249/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obesity Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-024-07425-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-024-07425-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介跨学科指南建议在代谢和减肥手术(MBS)前进行术前心理评估。克利夫兰诊所行为评级系统(CCBRS)已被开发出来,用于评估接受代谢减重手术者的心理状态。然而,该系统对长期体重减轻和随访出席率的预测价值尚未得到广泛研究。本研究旨在评估CCBRS对MBS术后5年内体重减轻和随访出席率的预测价值:在这项队列研究中(n = 1236),除了标准的社会心理行为筛查外,心理学家还在 MBS 前对每位患者进行了 CCBRS 筛查。CCBRS 包括九个心理领域,采用李克特五点量表评分,从 "差 "到 "优"。研究人员采用线性混合模型和序数回归分析法来分析随时间推移体重减轻的百分比以及术后5年的随访情况:结果:共有 1086 名患者接受了后续的 MBS 治疗。与参照组 "优秀 "相比,CCBRS 的某些组别在体重减轻和随访出席率方面存在显著差异。然而,这些差异在任何特定领域的所有组别中都不一致:在该队列中,CCBRS对MBS后5年内体重减轻和随访出席率的预测价值有限。重要的是要考虑到某些局限性,如大量的随访损失。尽管如此,CCBRS仍有助于确定患者的优势和需要改进的方面,对结构化心理评估很有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-Term Weight Loss and Attendance Outcomes Following Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: An Evaluation of The Cleveland Clinic Behavioral Rating System.

Introduction: Interdisciplinary guidelines recommend preoperative psychological evaluation before metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS). The Cleveland Clinic Behavioral Rating System (CCBRS) has been developed to evaluate the psychological state of individuals undergoing MBS. However, its predictive value concerning long-term weight loss and follow-up attendance has not been extensively studied. This study aims to assess the predictive value of the CCBRS regarding weight loss and follow-up attendance up to 5 years after MBS.

Methods: In this cohort study (n = 1236), psychologists administered the CCBRS to each patient prior to MBS in addition to the standard psychosocial-behavioral screening. The CCBRS consists of nine psychological domains and is scored on a five-point Likert scale, from "poor" to "excellent." Linear mixed models and ordinal regression analysis were used to analyze the percentage total weight loss over time and follow-up attendance up to 5 years after surgery.

Results: A total of 1086 patients underwent subsequent MBS. Significant differences in weight loss and follow-up attendance were observed between some CCBRS groups compared to the reference group "excellent." However, these differences were not consistent across all groups within any given domain.

Conclusion: In this cohort, the predictive value of the CCBRS for weight loss and follow-up attendance up to 5 years after MBS was limited. It is important to consider certain limitations, such as considerable loss to follow-up. Nevertheless, the CCBRS remains valuable for structured psychological assessments by helping to identify patients' strengths and areas needing improvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Surgery
Obesity Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.10%
发文量
567
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
期刊最新文献
"Impenetrable" Is a Subjective Term and Bariatric Procedures Can Provide a Safer Treatment Option for Patients with Obesity and Complex Abdominal Wall Hernias-"Laparocele". The Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Opioid Consumption and Respiratory Recovery in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study. Efficacy of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Obesity Is Increasing in Liver Transplant Recipients and Exacerbates Cardiovascular Risk: A Single-Centre European Study. Narrative Comments Regarding the Efficacy of Aprepitant in Preventing Post-bariatric Surgery Nausea and Vomiting: Evidence from Clinical Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1