剖宫产后提前出院:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101524
Nadim Chaarani MD , Sara Sorrenti MD , Antonio Sasanelli MD , Daniele Di Mascio MD , Vincenzo Berghella MD
{"title":"剖宫产后提前出院:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Nadim Chaarani MD ,&nbsp;Sara Sorrenti MD ,&nbsp;Antonio Sasanelli MD ,&nbsp;Daniele Di Mascio MD ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Berghella MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess whether early discharge from hospital after cesarean delivery (CD) affects the rate of maternal readmission.</div></div><div><h3>Data source</h3><div>The research was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Web of Sciences, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials as electronic databases, from the inception of each database to August 2023 with RCT as publication type. No restrictions for language or geographic location were applied.</div></div><div><h3>Study eligibility criteria</h3><div>Selection criteria included only RCTs comparing the effect of earlier versus later hospital discharge after CD.</div></div><div><h3>Study appraisal and synthesis methods</h3><div>The primary outcome was the rate of maternal readmission. The summary measures were reported as relative risk (RR) or as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the random effects model of Mentel–Haenszel. I-squared (Higgins I<sup>2</sup>) greater than 0% was used to identify heterogeneity. “Early” and “late” hospital discharge was first considered according to each study's definition and then a subgroup analysis was performed including only studies defining as “early” a discharge within 24–28 hours and “late” a discharge at ≥48 hours after CD. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD 42024529885).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seven RCTs including 4,267 individuals, of which 2,125 (49.8%) randomized in the early discharge and 2,142 (50.2%) in the late discharge group were included. There was no difference between the two groups in the rate of maternal readmission (3.6% vs. 3.4%, RR 1.10; 95% CI 0.80–1.52). There was no significant difference in both maternal complications diagnosed within 6 weeks after CD and neonatal complications. Early discharge after CD was associated with improved psychological wellbeing and was cost-effective. The subgroup analysis of the primary outcomes only in high-quality studies showed similar results: no difference in the rate of maternal readmission was observed (3.8% vs. 3.2%, RR 1.20; 95% CI 0.63–2.30) between the two groups. When focusing only on studies comparing 24–28-hour versus ≥ 48-hour hospital discharge, the rate of maternal readmission did not differ between the two groups, while the rates of neonatal readmission and neonatal jaundice were significantly higher in the early discharge group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is no increase in the rate of maternal readmission following early hospital discharge at 24–28 hours as opposed to later hospital discharge after a CD. The rates of neonatal readmission and neonatal jaundice were significantly higher in the early discharge group. Patients undergoing uncomplicated CDs might be discharged from the hospital at 24–28 hours postpartum, as long as close neonatal outpatient follow-up is done in 1–2 days; if this is unfeasible, discharge at 48 hours seems to be safe and effective for both mother and baby. Early discharge after CD was associated with improved psychological wellbeing and was cost-effective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":"6 12","pages":"Article 101524"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early hospital discharge after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"Nadim Chaarani MD ,&nbsp;Sara Sorrenti MD ,&nbsp;Antonio Sasanelli MD ,&nbsp;Daniele Di Mascio MD ,&nbsp;Vincenzo Berghella MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess whether early discharge from hospital after cesarean delivery (CD) affects the rate of maternal readmission.</div></div><div><h3>Data source</h3><div>The research was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Web of Sciences, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials as electronic databases, from the inception of each database to August 2023 with RCT as publication type. No restrictions for language or geographic location were applied.</div></div><div><h3>Study eligibility criteria</h3><div>Selection criteria included only RCTs comparing the effect of earlier versus later hospital discharge after CD.</div></div><div><h3>Study appraisal and synthesis methods</h3><div>The primary outcome was the rate of maternal readmission. The summary measures were reported as relative risk (RR) or as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the random effects model of Mentel–Haenszel. I-squared (Higgins I<sup>2</sup>) greater than 0% was used to identify heterogeneity. “Early” and “late” hospital discharge was first considered according to each study's definition and then a subgroup analysis was performed including only studies defining as “early” a discharge within 24–28 hours and “late” a discharge at ≥48 hours after CD. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD 42024529885).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seven RCTs including 4,267 individuals, of which 2,125 (49.8%) randomized in the early discharge and 2,142 (50.2%) in the late discharge group were included. There was no difference between the two groups in the rate of maternal readmission (3.6% vs. 3.4%, RR 1.10; 95% CI 0.80–1.52). There was no significant difference in both maternal complications diagnosed within 6 weeks after CD and neonatal complications. Early discharge after CD was associated with improved psychological wellbeing and was cost-effective. The subgroup analysis of the primary outcomes only in high-quality studies showed similar results: no difference in the rate of maternal readmission was observed (3.8% vs. 3.2%, RR 1.20; 95% CI 0.63–2.30) between the two groups. When focusing only on studies comparing 24–28-hour versus ≥ 48-hour hospital discharge, the rate of maternal readmission did not differ between the two groups, while the rates of neonatal readmission and neonatal jaundice were significantly higher in the early discharge group.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is no increase in the rate of maternal readmission following early hospital discharge at 24–28 hours as opposed to later hospital discharge after a CD. The rates of neonatal readmission and neonatal jaundice were significantly higher in the early discharge group. Patients undergoing uncomplicated CDs might be discharged from the hospital at 24–28 hours postpartum, as long as close neonatal outpatient follow-up is done in 1–2 days; if this is unfeasible, discharge at 48 hours seems to be safe and effective for both mother and baby. Early discharge after CD was associated with improved psychological wellbeing and was cost-effective.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm\",\"volume\":\"6 12\",\"pages\":\"Article 101524\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589933324002507\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589933324002507","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估剖宫产(CD)后提前出院是否会影响产妇再入院率:研究使用 PubMed、Embase、Web of Sciences、Scopus、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 等电子数据库,研究时间从各数据库建立之初至 2023 年 8 月,研究类型为 RCT。研究资格标准:研究评估和综合方法:主要结果是产妇再入院率。采用 Mentel-Haenszel 随机效应模型,以相对风险(RR)或平均差(MD)及 95% 置信区间(CI)报告总结指标。I 平方(Higgins I2)大于 0% 用于识别异质性。首先根据每项研究的定义考虑 "较早 "和 "较晚 "出院的情况,然后进行亚组分析,其中只包括定义为 "较早 "在 CD 后 24-28 小时内出院和 "较晚 "在 CD 后 48 小时内出院的研究。该研究已在 PROSPERO(CRD 42024529885)上注册:结果:共纳入了七项 RCT 研究,包括 4267 名患者,其中 2125 人(49.8%)被随机分入早期出院组,2142 人(50.2%)被随机分入晚期出院组。两组产妇的再入院率没有差异(3.6% vs 3.4%,RR 1.10;95% CI 0.80-1.52)。分娩后 6 周内诊断出的产妇并发症和新生儿并发症没有明显差异。剖宫产后尽早出院与心理健康的改善有关,而且具有成本效益。仅对高质量研究的主要结果进行的亚组分析显示了相似的结果:两组间的产妇再入院率无差异(3.8% vs 3.2%,RR 1.20;95% CI 0.63-2.30)。如果只关注比较 24-28 小时出院与 48 小时出院的研究,则两组产妇的再入院率没有差异,而较早出院组的新生儿再入院率和新生儿黄疸率明显较高:结论:与 CD 后较晚出院相比,24-28 小时提前出院的产妇再入院率没有增加。较早出院组的新生儿再入院率和新生儿黄疸率明显较高。接受无并发症产前诊断的患者可在产后24-28小时出院,只要在1-2天内进行密切的新生儿门诊随访即可;如果不可行,48小时出院似乎对母婴都安全有效。分娩后尽早出院与心理健康的改善有关,而且具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early hospital discharge after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objective

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess whether early discharge from hospital after cesarean delivery (CD) affects the rate of maternal readmission.

Data source

The research was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Web of Sciences, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials as electronic databases, from the inception of each database to August 2023 with RCT as publication type. No restrictions for language or geographic location were applied.

Study eligibility criteria

Selection criteria included only RCTs comparing the effect of earlier versus later hospital discharge after CD.

Study appraisal and synthesis methods

The primary outcome was the rate of maternal readmission. The summary measures were reported as relative risk (RR) or as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using the random effects model of Mentel–Haenszel. I-squared (Higgins I2) greater than 0% was used to identify heterogeneity. “Early” and “late” hospital discharge was first considered according to each study's definition and then a subgroup analysis was performed including only studies defining as “early” a discharge within 24–28 hours and “late” a discharge at ≥48 hours after CD. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD 42024529885).

Results

Seven RCTs including 4,267 individuals, of which 2,125 (49.8%) randomized in the early discharge and 2,142 (50.2%) in the late discharge group were included. There was no difference between the two groups in the rate of maternal readmission (3.6% vs. 3.4%, RR 1.10; 95% CI 0.80–1.52). There was no significant difference in both maternal complications diagnosed within 6 weeks after CD and neonatal complications. Early discharge after CD was associated with improved psychological wellbeing and was cost-effective. The subgroup analysis of the primary outcomes only in high-quality studies showed similar results: no difference in the rate of maternal readmission was observed (3.8% vs. 3.2%, RR 1.20; 95% CI 0.63–2.30) between the two groups. When focusing only on studies comparing 24–28-hour versus ≥ 48-hour hospital discharge, the rate of maternal readmission did not differ between the two groups, while the rates of neonatal readmission and neonatal jaundice were significantly higher in the early discharge group.

Conclusions

There is no increase in the rate of maternal readmission following early hospital discharge at 24–28 hours as opposed to later hospital discharge after a CD. The rates of neonatal readmission and neonatal jaundice were significantly higher in the early discharge group. Patients undergoing uncomplicated CDs might be discharged from the hospital at 24–28 hours postpartum, as long as close neonatal outpatient follow-up is done in 1–2 days; if this is unfeasible, discharge at 48 hours seems to be safe and effective for both mother and baby. Early discharge after CD was associated with improved psychological wellbeing and was cost-effective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
254
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) is a highly esteemed publication with two companion titles. One of these is the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Maternal-Fetal Medicine (AJOG MFM), which is dedicated to the latest research in the field of maternal-fetal medicine, specifically concerning high-risk pregnancies. The journal encompasses a wide range of topics, including: Maternal Complications: It addresses significant studies that have the potential to change clinical practice regarding complications faced by pregnant women. Fetal Complications: The journal covers prenatal diagnosis, ultrasound, and genetic issues related to the fetus, providing insights into the management and care of fetal health. Prenatal Care: It discusses the best practices in prenatal care to ensure the health and well-being of both the mother and the unborn child. Intrapartum Care: It provides guidance on the care provided during the childbirth process, which is critical for the safety of both mother and baby. Postpartum Issues: The journal also tackles issues that arise after childbirth, focusing on the postpartum period and its implications for maternal health. AJOG MFM serves as a reliable forum for peer-reviewed research, with a preference for randomized trials and meta-analyses. The goal is to equip researchers and clinicians with the most current information and evidence-based strategies to effectively manage high-risk pregnancies and to provide the best possible care for mothers and their unborn children.
期刊最新文献
Evidence-based obstetric guidance in the setting of a global intravenous fluid shortage The Process of Developing a Comprehensive Maternal-Fetal Surgery Center. Evidence-based Cesarean Delivery: Postoperative Care (Part 10). Screening Tests for Preeclampsia: in Search of Clinical Utility. The impact of obstetrics and gynecology journal podcasts on the dissemination of featured articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1