护士对负压隔离病房和普通病房医疗服务机器人的看法:横断面调查。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Nursing Open Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.2175
Jung Hwan Lee, In Ho Han, Jong Hwan Park, Kye-Hyung Kim, Jaehyun Hwang, Dong Hwan Kim, Jae Il Lee, Kyoung Hyup Nam
{"title":"护士对负压隔离病房和普通病房医疗服务机器人的看法:横断面调查。","authors":"Jung Hwan Lee, In Ho Han, Jong Hwan Park, Kye-Hyung Kim, Jaehyun Hwang, Dong Hwan Kim, Jae Il Lee, Kyoung Hyup Nam","doi":"10.1002/nop2.2175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate nurses' workload during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and to identify their perception of medical serviced robots (MSRs) that may help with or replace the tasks of nurses in negative-pressure isolated wards and general wards.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A researcher-made questionnaire was applied that assessed nurses' current workload and their attitudes towards and perceptions of MSRs. A visual analogue scale (VAS) from 1 to 10 was used to assess workload. Perceptions evaluated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from one point for 'strongly disagree' to five points for 'strongly agree'. A higher VAS score indicated a higher workload. On the other hands, a higher Likert score indicated a more positive perception and three points was neutral. The questionnaire was conducted on 150 nurses in negative-pressure isolated wards for the management of COVID-19 and 150 nurses in general wards. Quota sampling technique was used as sampling technique. Data analysis was performed through independent t-tests, chi-square tests and two-tailed tests. The p-value <0.05 was interpreted to statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred eighty-two participants responded and 142 belonged to the negative-pressure isolated ward. The overall response rate was 94%, and 94.7% in the negative isolated ward. The mean score ± standard deviation for nursing-related psychological stress at the current work site was 7.18 ± 1.58 points, and the mean score for physical workload was 7.65 ± 1.48. The need for MSRs was rated as 3.66 ± 0.86 out of 5. Overall, a positive attitude towards MSRs was confirmed, with no difference between ward groups. The overall ratings were 3.14 ± 1.15 for perceived availability and 3.26 ± 1.13 for perceived efficiency. Both nurse groups perceived that MSRs were most available and efficient for monitoring and measurements. Nurses in negative-pressure isolated wards perceived MSRs more positively than did nurses in general wards regarding setting of alarms (p = 0.003) and delivery of medical devices/materials (p = 0.013). Based on these results, functional development of MSRs associated with monitoring, measurements, setting of alarms and delivery should be prioritized. No patient or public contribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":"11 10","pages":"e2175"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11467167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurses' perceptions of medical service robots in negative-pressure isolated wards and in general wards: A cross-sectional survey.\",\"authors\":\"Jung Hwan Lee, In Ho Han, Jong Hwan Park, Kye-Hyung Kim, Jaehyun Hwang, Dong Hwan Kim, Jae Il Lee, Kyoung Hyup Nam\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nop2.2175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate nurses' workload during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and to identify their perception of medical serviced robots (MSRs) that may help with or replace the tasks of nurses in negative-pressure isolated wards and general wards.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A researcher-made questionnaire was applied that assessed nurses' current workload and their attitudes towards and perceptions of MSRs. A visual analogue scale (VAS) from 1 to 10 was used to assess workload. Perceptions evaluated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from one point for 'strongly disagree' to five points for 'strongly agree'. A higher VAS score indicated a higher workload. On the other hands, a higher Likert score indicated a more positive perception and three points was neutral. The questionnaire was conducted on 150 nurses in negative-pressure isolated wards for the management of COVID-19 and 150 nurses in general wards. Quota sampling technique was used as sampling technique. Data analysis was performed through independent t-tests, chi-square tests and two-tailed tests. The p-value <0.05 was interpreted to statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred eighty-two participants responded and 142 belonged to the negative-pressure isolated ward. The overall response rate was 94%, and 94.7% in the negative isolated ward. The mean score ± standard deviation for nursing-related psychological stress at the current work site was 7.18 ± 1.58 points, and the mean score for physical workload was 7.65 ± 1.48. The need for MSRs was rated as 3.66 ± 0.86 out of 5. Overall, a positive attitude towards MSRs was confirmed, with no difference between ward groups. The overall ratings were 3.14 ± 1.15 for perceived availability and 3.26 ± 1.13 for perceived efficiency. Both nurse groups perceived that MSRs were most available and efficient for monitoring and measurements. Nurses in negative-pressure isolated wards perceived MSRs more positively than did nurses in general wards regarding setting of alarms (p = 0.003) and delivery of medical devices/materials (p = 0.013). Based on these results, functional development of MSRs associated with monitoring, measurements, setting of alarms and delivery should be prioritized. No patient or public contribution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Open\",\"volume\":\"11 10\",\"pages\":\"e2175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11467167/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.2175\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.2175","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间护士的工作量,并确定他们对医疗服务机器人(MSR)的看法,MSR可帮助或替代负压隔离病房和普通病房护士的任务:设计:横断面调查:方法:采用研究人员自制的调查问卷,评估护士目前的工作量及其对医疗机器人的态度和看法。评估工作量时使用了1至10的视觉模拟量表(VAS)。看法采用 5 分李克特量表进行评估,从 1 分表示 "非常不同意 "到 5 分表示 "非常同意"。VAS 分数越高,表示工作量越大。另一方面,Likert 分值越高,表示对工作量的看法越积极,3 分表示中性。问卷调查的对象是 150 名负压隔离病房的护士和 150 名普通病房的护士,前者负责 COVID-19 的管理,后者负责普通病房的管理。抽样采用配额抽样技术。数据分析采用独立 t 检验、卡方检验和双尾检验。p 值结果:282 名参与者做出了回应,其中 142 人属于负压隔离病房。总回复率为 94%,负压隔离病房的回复率为 94.7%。目前工作地点与护理相关的心理压力平均分(标准差)为 7.18 ± 1.58 分,体力工作量平均分(标准差)为 7.65 ± 1.48 分。对 MSR 的需求被评为 3.66 ± 0.86 分(满分 5 分)。总体而言,对 MSR 的态度是积极的,病房组之间没有差异。对可用性的总体评价为 3.14 ± 1.15,对效率的总体评价为 3.26 ± 1.13。两组护士都认为 MSR 在监测和测量方面最方便、最有效。负压隔离病房的护士比普通病房的护士对 MSR 在设置警报(p = 0.003)和提供医疗设备/材料(p = 0.013)方面的感知更积极。基于这些结果,应优先发展与监测、测量、设置警报和交付相关的 MSR 功能。无患者或公众贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nurses' perceptions of medical service robots in negative-pressure isolated wards and in general wards: A cross-sectional survey.

Aim: To evaluate nurses' workload during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and to identify their perception of medical serviced robots (MSRs) that may help with or replace the tasks of nurses in negative-pressure isolated wards and general wards.

Design: Cross-sectional survey.

Methods: A researcher-made questionnaire was applied that assessed nurses' current workload and their attitudes towards and perceptions of MSRs. A visual analogue scale (VAS) from 1 to 10 was used to assess workload. Perceptions evaluated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from one point for 'strongly disagree' to five points for 'strongly agree'. A higher VAS score indicated a higher workload. On the other hands, a higher Likert score indicated a more positive perception and three points was neutral. The questionnaire was conducted on 150 nurses in negative-pressure isolated wards for the management of COVID-19 and 150 nurses in general wards. Quota sampling technique was used as sampling technique. Data analysis was performed through independent t-tests, chi-square tests and two-tailed tests. The p-value <0.05 was interpreted to statistically significant.

Results: Two hundred eighty-two participants responded and 142 belonged to the negative-pressure isolated ward. The overall response rate was 94%, and 94.7% in the negative isolated ward. The mean score ± standard deviation for nursing-related psychological stress at the current work site was 7.18 ± 1.58 points, and the mean score for physical workload was 7.65 ± 1.48. The need for MSRs was rated as 3.66 ± 0.86 out of 5. Overall, a positive attitude towards MSRs was confirmed, with no difference between ward groups. The overall ratings were 3.14 ± 1.15 for perceived availability and 3.26 ± 1.13 for perceived efficiency. Both nurse groups perceived that MSRs were most available and efficient for monitoring and measurements. Nurses in negative-pressure isolated wards perceived MSRs more positively than did nurses in general wards regarding setting of alarms (p = 0.003) and delivery of medical devices/materials (p = 0.013). Based on these results, functional development of MSRs associated with monitoring, measurements, setting of alarms and delivery should be prioritized. No patient or public contribution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Nursing Workload in the Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit: Comparative Study. Setting national nursing research priorities in Qatar: A Delphi survey. The incidence and risk factors of gastrointestinal dysfunction during enteral nutrition in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Psychological Distress in Patients With Recurrent Ectopic Pregnancies: A Cross-Sectional Study. Comfort Need of Hospitalised Patients With Covid-19 During Isolation Precaution: A Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1