比利时实验室目前的尿液分析方法,以实现 2023 年 EFLM 欧洲尿液分析指南。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Acta Clinica Belgica Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1080/17843286.2024.2414155
Lieve Van Hoovels, Bénédicte Vanhove, An-Sofie Decavele, Arnaud Capron, Matthijs Oyaert
{"title":"比利时实验室目前的尿液分析方法,以实现 2023 年 EFLM 欧洲尿液分析指南。","authors":"Lieve Van Hoovels, Bénédicte Vanhove, An-Sofie Decavele, Arnaud Capron, Matthijs Oyaert","doi":"10.1080/17843286.2024.2414155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives/background: </strong>We aimed to investigate routine urinalysis practices in Belgian laboratories and verify these findings against the 2023 European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) European Urinalysis Guideline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire was developed to collect information on pre- to postanalytical aspects of urine test strip and particle analysis. The questionnaire was distributed by Sciensano to all Belgian laboratories, licensed to perform urine particle analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six percent of the Belgian laboratories (75/113) participated. The responding laboratories served physicians in private (25%), hospital (60%) and university hospital (15%) setting. All laboratories performed test strip and particle analysis, predominantly automatically (97% and 96%, respectively). In addition, most laboratories (87%) used intelligent verification criteria to optimize diagnostic accuracy. Almost all laboratories (≥90%) screened and reported a minimal biochemistry panel (glucose, protein, pH, ketones) and particle count (red and white blood cells). Independent of the technology, a notable variability was observed regarding medical cut-off values and advanced particle differentiation and reporting. Internal quality control was extensively performed for urine test strip (91%) and particle analysis (96%), while external QC was less common (32% and 36%, respectively). Consequently, only few laboratories were ISO15189 accredited for urine test strip (15%) and particle analysis (17%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is considerable variability in current urinalysis performed in Belgian laboratories. The 2023 EFLM urinalysis guideline has the potential to guide clinical laboratories towards improving their urinalysis practices. Additional efforts are required to implement these recommendations into clinical practice in Belgium.</p>","PeriodicalId":48865,"journal":{"name":"Acta Clinica Belgica","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current urinalysis practices in Belgian laboratories towards the 2023 EFLM European urinalysis guideline.\",\"authors\":\"Lieve Van Hoovels, Bénédicte Vanhove, An-Sofie Decavele, Arnaud Capron, Matthijs Oyaert\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17843286.2024.2414155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives/background: </strong>We aimed to investigate routine urinalysis practices in Belgian laboratories and verify these findings against the 2023 European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) European Urinalysis Guideline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire was developed to collect information on pre- to postanalytical aspects of urine test strip and particle analysis. The questionnaire was distributed by Sciensano to all Belgian laboratories, licensed to perform urine particle analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six percent of the Belgian laboratories (75/113) participated. The responding laboratories served physicians in private (25%), hospital (60%) and university hospital (15%) setting. All laboratories performed test strip and particle analysis, predominantly automatically (97% and 96%, respectively). In addition, most laboratories (87%) used intelligent verification criteria to optimize diagnostic accuracy. Almost all laboratories (≥90%) screened and reported a minimal biochemistry panel (glucose, protein, pH, ketones) and particle count (red and white blood cells). Independent of the technology, a notable variability was observed regarding medical cut-off values and advanced particle differentiation and reporting. Internal quality control was extensively performed for urine test strip (91%) and particle analysis (96%), while external QC was less common (32% and 36%, respectively). Consequently, only few laboratories were ISO15189 accredited for urine test strip (15%) and particle analysis (17%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is considerable variability in current urinalysis performed in Belgian laboratories. The 2023 EFLM urinalysis guideline has the potential to guide clinical laboratories towards improving their urinalysis practices. Additional efforts are required to implement these recommendations into clinical practice in Belgium.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Clinica Belgica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Clinica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17843286.2024.2414155\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Clinica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17843286.2024.2414155","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标/背景:我们旨在调查比利时实验室的常规尿液分析方法,并对照欧洲临床化学和实验室医学联合会(EFLM)2023 年欧洲尿液分析指南验证这些调查结果:编制了一份调查问卷,以收集尿液试纸和颗粒分析的分析前和分析后方面的信息。Sciensano公司向比利时所有获得尿液颗粒分析许可证的实验室发放了调查问卷:66%的比利时实验室(75/113)参与了问卷调查。参与调查的实验室为私立医院(25%)、医院(60%)和大学医院(15%)的医生提供服务。所有实验室都进行了试纸和颗粒分析,主要是自动分析(分别为 97% 和 96%)。此外,大多数实验室(87%)使用智能验证标准来优化诊断准确性。几乎所有实验室(≥90%)都筛查并报告了最基本的生化分析(葡萄糖、蛋白质、pH 值、酮体)和微粒计数(红细胞和白细胞)。与技术无关的是,在医学截止值和高级微粒分辨与报告方面存在显著差异。尿液试纸(91%)和微粒分析(96%)广泛采用内部质量控制,而外部质量控制较少(分别为 32% 和 36%)。因此,只有少数实验室的尿液试纸(15%)和颗粒分析(17%)通过了 ISO15189 认证:结论:比利时实验室目前进行的尿液分析存在很大差异。2023 EFLM尿液分析指南有可能指导临床实验室改进尿液分析方法。比利时还需要进一步努力将这些建议落实到临床实践中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Current urinalysis practices in Belgian laboratories towards the 2023 EFLM European urinalysis guideline.

Objectives/background: We aimed to investigate routine urinalysis practices in Belgian laboratories and verify these findings against the 2023 European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) European Urinalysis Guideline.

Methods: A questionnaire was developed to collect information on pre- to postanalytical aspects of urine test strip and particle analysis. The questionnaire was distributed by Sciensano to all Belgian laboratories, licensed to perform urine particle analysis.

Results: Sixty-six percent of the Belgian laboratories (75/113) participated. The responding laboratories served physicians in private (25%), hospital (60%) and university hospital (15%) setting. All laboratories performed test strip and particle analysis, predominantly automatically (97% and 96%, respectively). In addition, most laboratories (87%) used intelligent verification criteria to optimize diagnostic accuracy. Almost all laboratories (≥90%) screened and reported a minimal biochemistry panel (glucose, protein, pH, ketones) and particle count (red and white blood cells). Independent of the technology, a notable variability was observed regarding medical cut-off values and advanced particle differentiation and reporting. Internal quality control was extensively performed for urine test strip (91%) and particle analysis (96%), while external QC was less common (32% and 36%, respectively). Consequently, only few laboratories were ISO15189 accredited for urine test strip (15%) and particle analysis (17%).

Conclusion: There is considerable variability in current urinalysis performed in Belgian laboratories. The 2023 EFLM urinalysis guideline has the potential to guide clinical laboratories towards improving their urinalysis practices. Additional efforts are required to implement these recommendations into clinical practice in Belgium.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Clinica Belgica
Acta Clinica Belgica MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Acta Clinica Belgica: International Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Medicine primarily publishes papers on clinical medicine, clinical chemistry, pathology and molecular biology, provided they describe results which contribute to our understanding of clinical problems or describe new methods applicable to clinical investigation. Readership includes physicians, pathologists, pharmacists and physicians working in non-academic and academic hospitals, practicing internal medicine and its subspecialties.
期刊最新文献
Current urinalysis practices in Belgian laboratories towards the 2023 EFLM European urinalysis guideline. Immune landscape in the glomerular transcriptome of nephrotic syndrome and anca-associated vasculitis. Expansion of MALDI-TOF MS database as a strategy for identification of Haemophilus species other than H. influenzae. Single center, real-world retrospective study of CAR-T cell therapy for relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma beyond second line: five-year results at the University Hospitals Leuven. A characterization of the HIV population with limited/exhausted treatment options: a multicenter Belgian study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1