调查客观社交媒体使用、注意力控制和心理困扰之间的联系。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Social Science & Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117400
{"title":"调查客观社交媒体使用、注意力控制和心理困扰之间的联系。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social media use (SMU) has been associated with negative mental health outcomes and has been implicated in inhibitory attentional control deficits. However, findings have been inconsistent, in part due to methodological limitations in past studies (e.g., over-reliance on self-report SMU and attentional control measures). Therefore, the aim of the present study was to examine the associations between SMU, psychological distress (including depression, anxiety, and stress), and inhibitory attentional control, using objective measures of SMU and inhibitory attentional control. Participants (<em>N</em> = 425) completed the DASS-21 and an antisaccade task, and SMU data was accessed via mobile phones, as minutes/week spent using TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat, Facebook, and Twitter/X. Bivariate correlations were examined, and a moderation analysis was conducted to determine whether attentional control moderated the association between SMU and psychological distress. Our findings revealed that SMU was positively associated with attentional control and anxiety, while TikTok use was positively associated with attentional control, and Facebook use with psychological distress. However, the observed associations were very small, suggesting that the links between SMU and both psychological distress and attentional control may be over-stated, particularly in studies that have utilised self-report SMU measures. No moderating effect of attentional control on the relationship between SMU and psychological distress was observed. These findings highlight the importance of utilising objective SMU and cognitive measures when examining the links between SMU, mental health, and cognitive processes (like attentional control), and to corroborate findings based on associations with self-report SMU indicators.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the links between objective social media use, attentional control, and psychological distress\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Social media use (SMU) has been associated with negative mental health outcomes and has been implicated in inhibitory attentional control deficits. However, findings have been inconsistent, in part due to methodological limitations in past studies (e.g., over-reliance on self-report SMU and attentional control measures). Therefore, the aim of the present study was to examine the associations between SMU, psychological distress (including depression, anxiety, and stress), and inhibitory attentional control, using objective measures of SMU and inhibitory attentional control. Participants (<em>N</em> = 425) completed the DASS-21 and an antisaccade task, and SMU data was accessed via mobile phones, as minutes/week spent using TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat, Facebook, and Twitter/X. Bivariate correlations were examined, and a moderation analysis was conducted to determine whether attentional control moderated the association between SMU and psychological distress. Our findings revealed that SMU was positively associated with attentional control and anxiety, while TikTok use was positively associated with attentional control, and Facebook use with psychological distress. However, the observed associations were very small, suggesting that the links between SMU and both psychological distress and attentional control may be over-stated, particularly in studies that have utilised self-report SMU measures. No moderating effect of attentional control on the relationship between SMU and psychological distress was observed. These findings highlight the importance of utilising objective SMU and cognitive measures when examining the links between SMU, mental health, and cognitive processes (like attentional control), and to corroborate findings based on associations with self-report SMU indicators.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science & Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624008542\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624008542","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社交媒体使用(SMU)与负面心理健康结果有关,并与抑制性注意控制缺陷有关。然而,研究结果并不一致,部分原因是过去的研究在方法上存在局限性(如过度依赖自我报告的 SMU 和注意力控制测量)。因此,本研究旨在通过客观测量SMU和抑制性注意控制,研究SMU、心理困扰(包括抑郁、焦虑和压力)和抑制性注意控制之间的关联。参与者(N = 425)完成了 DASS-21 和反施法任务,并通过手机访问了 SMU 数据,即使用 TikTok、Instagram、Snapchat、Facebook 和 Twitter/X 的分钟/周数。我们研究了二元相关性,并进行了调节分析,以确定注意力控制是否调节了SMU与心理困扰之间的关联。我们的研究结果表明,SMU 与注意力控制和焦虑呈正相关,而 TikTok 的使用与注意力控制呈正相关,Facebook 的使用与心理困扰呈正相关。然而,观察到的关联非常小,表明SMU与心理困扰和注意力控制之间的关联可能被夸大了,特别是在使用自我报告SMU测量方法的研究中。没有观察到注意控制对SMU和心理困扰之间关系的调节作用。这些发现强调了在研究SMU、心理健康和认知过程(如注意力控制)之间的联系时使用客观SMU和认知测量的重要性,以及证实基于自我报告的SMU指标的研究结果的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigating the links between objective social media use, attentional control, and psychological distress
Social media use (SMU) has been associated with negative mental health outcomes and has been implicated in inhibitory attentional control deficits. However, findings have been inconsistent, in part due to methodological limitations in past studies (e.g., over-reliance on self-report SMU and attentional control measures). Therefore, the aim of the present study was to examine the associations between SMU, psychological distress (including depression, anxiety, and stress), and inhibitory attentional control, using objective measures of SMU and inhibitory attentional control. Participants (N = 425) completed the DASS-21 and an antisaccade task, and SMU data was accessed via mobile phones, as minutes/week spent using TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat, Facebook, and Twitter/X. Bivariate correlations were examined, and a moderation analysis was conducted to determine whether attentional control moderated the association between SMU and psychological distress. Our findings revealed that SMU was positively associated with attentional control and anxiety, while TikTok use was positively associated with attentional control, and Facebook use with psychological distress. However, the observed associations were very small, suggesting that the links between SMU and both psychological distress and attentional control may be over-stated, particularly in studies that have utilised self-report SMU measures. No moderating effect of attentional control on the relationship between SMU and psychological distress was observed. These findings highlight the importance of utilising objective SMU and cognitive measures when examining the links between SMU, mental health, and cognitive processes (like attentional control), and to corroborate findings based on associations with self-report SMU indicators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Repairing with a warm heart: How medical practitioners cultivate affective relationships with clients Later-life social network profiles of male war survivors in Vietnam: Implications for health behaviors Context dependent preferences in prestige bias learning about vaccination in rural Namibian pastoralists Hierarchy, class, race and PPE in an American hospital in the early days of COVID-19: What the pandemic stress test can teach us about building equitable health systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1