Yuying Chen, Huacong Wen, Anne Deutsch, Amanda Botticello, James G Lo, J Scott Richards
{"title":"创伤性脊髓损伤患者在 COVID-19 大流行期间的药物使用情况:横断面视角。","authors":"Yuying Chen, Huacong Wen, Anne Deutsch, Amanda Botticello, James G Lo, J Scott Richards","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2400748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Analysis of data from two cohorts of Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems Database (SCIMS) participants, pre-pandemic (2017-2019, <i>n</i> = 6368) and during pandemic (2020, <i>n</i> = 1889).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine differences in substance use during the pandemic compared to the years prior to the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>19 SCIMS Centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participant characteristics, wellness (depression, life satisfaction, resilience), participation, and substance use between the two cohorts were compared. Multiple logistic regression examined the association of the pandemic with substance use after accounting for other factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Characteristics of the two cohorts were similar. Cannabis and sedative uses were not greatly different (28.8% vs 25.1%, and 8.3% vs 6.6%) but did reach statistical significance. Non-prescribed opioid use was double for the pandemic group (6.6% vs 3.3%). Alcohol use patterns were similar across the two cohorts. Measures of wellness were similar, while the pandemic group reported lower participation. The odds of use of cannabis, sedatives, and opioids were 1.3, 1.3, and 2.2 times greater, respectively, for the pandemic cohort after accounting for demographics, wellness, and participation. Greater use of non-prescribed opioids was reported during the pandemic in the South compared to prior to the pandemic (13.8% vs 6.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pandemic may have been associated with increased use of non-prescribed substances in the traumatic spinal cord injury population. Efforts to pursue longitudinal investigations would be warranted for definitive analysis of trends. The provision of demonstrably effective substance use treatment resources delivered via accessible methods will likely be needed in this population, particularly opioid treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Substance use during the COVID-19 pandemic among persons with traumatic spinal cord injury: A cross-sectional perspective.\",\"authors\":\"Yuying Chen, Huacong Wen, Anne Deutsch, Amanda Botticello, James G Lo, J Scott Richards\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10790268.2024.2400748\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Analysis of data from two cohorts of Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems Database (SCIMS) participants, pre-pandemic (2017-2019, <i>n</i> = 6368) and during pandemic (2020, <i>n</i> = 1889).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine differences in substance use during the pandemic compared to the years prior to the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>19 SCIMS Centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participant characteristics, wellness (depression, life satisfaction, resilience), participation, and substance use between the two cohorts were compared. Multiple logistic regression examined the association of the pandemic with substance use after accounting for other factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Characteristics of the two cohorts were similar. Cannabis and sedative uses were not greatly different (28.8% vs 25.1%, and 8.3% vs 6.6%) but did reach statistical significance. Non-prescribed opioid use was double for the pandemic group (6.6% vs 3.3%). Alcohol use patterns were similar across the two cohorts. Measures of wellness were similar, while the pandemic group reported lower participation. The odds of use of cannabis, sedatives, and opioids were 1.3, 1.3, and 2.2 times greater, respectively, for the pandemic cohort after accounting for demographics, wellness, and participation. Greater use of non-prescribed opioids was reported during the pandemic in the South compared to prior to the pandemic (13.8% vs 6.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pandemic may have been associated with increased use of non-prescribed substances in the traumatic spinal cord injury population. Efforts to pursue longitudinal investigations would be warranted for definitive analysis of trends. The provision of demonstrably effective substance use treatment resources delivered via accessible methods will likely be needed in this population, particularly opioid treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2400748\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2400748","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Substance use during the COVID-19 pandemic among persons with traumatic spinal cord injury: A cross-sectional perspective.
Study design: Analysis of data from two cohorts of Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems Database (SCIMS) participants, pre-pandemic (2017-2019, n = 6368) and during pandemic (2020, n = 1889).
Objectives: To examine differences in substance use during the pandemic compared to the years prior to the pandemic.
Setting: 19 SCIMS Centers.
Methods: Participant characteristics, wellness (depression, life satisfaction, resilience), participation, and substance use between the two cohorts were compared. Multiple logistic regression examined the association of the pandemic with substance use after accounting for other factors.
Results: Characteristics of the two cohorts were similar. Cannabis and sedative uses were not greatly different (28.8% vs 25.1%, and 8.3% vs 6.6%) but did reach statistical significance. Non-prescribed opioid use was double for the pandemic group (6.6% vs 3.3%). Alcohol use patterns were similar across the two cohorts. Measures of wellness were similar, while the pandemic group reported lower participation. The odds of use of cannabis, sedatives, and opioids were 1.3, 1.3, and 2.2 times greater, respectively, for the pandemic cohort after accounting for demographics, wellness, and participation. Greater use of non-prescribed opioids was reported during the pandemic in the South compared to prior to the pandemic (13.8% vs 6.1%).
Conclusions: The pandemic may have been associated with increased use of non-prescribed substances in the traumatic spinal cord injury population. Efforts to pursue longitudinal investigations would be warranted for definitive analysis of trends. The provision of demonstrably effective substance use treatment resources delivered via accessible methods will likely be needed in this population, particularly opioid treatment.
期刊介绍:
For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.