在中国大陆慢性脊髓损伤患者中验证患者激活测量(PAM-13)。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1080/10790268.2024.2391594
Hai-Xia Xie, Ai-Rong Wu, Zi-Han Xu, Qi Zhang, Xin-Yu Wang, Hao Yu, Nan Li, Yan Wei, Xiao-Hong Li, Hua Zhai, Feng-Shui Chang
{"title":"在中国大陆慢性脊髓损伤患者中验证患者激活测量(PAM-13)。","authors":"Hai-Xia Xie, Ai-Rong Wu, Zi-Han Xu, Qi Zhang, Xin-Yu Wang, Hao Yu, Nan Li, Yan Wei, Xiao-Hong Li, Hua Zhai, Feng-Shui Chang","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2391594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context/objective: </strong>The 13-item Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13) is the most widely used generic patient activation measure, but spinal cord injury (SCI) related psychometric evaluation of PAM-13 has not been explored globally. This study aimed to assess the validity of the Chinese version of the PAM-13 (PAM-13-C) for individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (CSCI).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center, and some participants were recruited in a WeChat group (the most commonly used social media platform in China).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>284 individuals with spinal cord injury who had lived with the injury for ≥0.5 year.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>NA.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The PAM-13-C, global QoL, seven-item generalized anxiety disorder scale (GAD-7) and nine-item patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9), and General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (SD) PAM-13-C score was 57.4 (16.5). The highest percentage of NA could be observed in item 9 (12.0%). Floor and ceiling effects of the total scores of PAM-13-C were small (0.7% and 6.7%), but a ceiling effect could be observed among all items. Exploratory Factor Analysis supported a one-factor model of the PAM-13-C (CFI = 0.97; RMSEA = 0.07). Construct validity was established through correlation analysis among the PAM-13-C, GAD-7/PHQ-9, global QoL, and GSES. The PAM-13-C demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's <i>α</i> = 0.95) and acceptable test-retest reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PAM-13-C is a reliable and valid measure of patient activation for individuals with CSCI in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13) among individuals with chronic spinal cord injury in mainland China.\",\"authors\":\"Hai-Xia Xie, Ai-Rong Wu, Zi-Han Xu, Qi Zhang, Xin-Yu Wang, Hao Yu, Nan Li, Yan Wei, Xiao-Hong Li, Hua Zhai, Feng-Shui Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10790268.2024.2391594\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context/objective: </strong>The 13-item Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13) is the most widely used generic patient activation measure, but spinal cord injury (SCI) related psychometric evaluation of PAM-13 has not been explored globally. This study aimed to assess the validity of the Chinese version of the PAM-13 (PAM-13-C) for individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (CSCI).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center, and some participants were recruited in a WeChat group (the most commonly used social media platform in China).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>284 individuals with spinal cord injury who had lived with the injury for ≥0.5 year.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>NA.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The PAM-13-C, global QoL, seven-item generalized anxiety disorder scale (GAD-7) and nine-item patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9), and General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (SD) PAM-13-C score was 57.4 (16.5). The highest percentage of NA could be observed in item 9 (12.0%). Floor and ceiling effects of the total scores of PAM-13-C were small (0.7% and 6.7%), but a ceiling effect could be observed among all items. Exploratory Factor Analysis supported a one-factor model of the PAM-13-C (CFI = 0.97; RMSEA = 0.07). Construct validity was established through correlation analysis among the PAM-13-C, GAD-7/PHQ-9, global QoL, and GSES. The PAM-13-C demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's <i>α</i> = 0.95) and acceptable test-retest reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PAM-13-C is a reliable and valid measure of patient activation for individuals with CSCI in China.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2391594\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2391594","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:由13个项目组成的患者活化测量(PAM-13)是最广泛使用的通用患者活化测量方法,但全球尚未对脊髓损伤(SCI)相关的PAM-13进行心理测量学评估。本研究旨在评估 PAM-13 中文版(PAM-13-C)对慢性脊髓损伤(CSCI)患者的有效性:设计:横断面研究:参与者:284名脊髓损伤患者,他们带伤生活≥0.5年:结果测量采用PAM-13-C、总体QoL、七项广泛性焦虑症量表(GAD-7)和九项患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)以及一般自我效能量表(GSES):PAM-13-C 的平均(标清)得分为 57.4(16.5)分。第 9 项(12.0%)的 NA 百分比最高。PAM-13-C 总分的下限效应和上限效应较小(0.7% 和 6.7%),但在所有项目中均可观察到上限效应。探索性因子分析支持 PAM-13-C 的单因子模型(CFI = 0.97;RMSEA = 0.07)。通过对 PAM-13-C、GAD-7/PHQ-9、全局 QoL 和 GSES 进行相关性分析,建立了结构效度。PAM-13-C显示出良好的内部一致性(Cronbach's α = 0.95)和可接受的测试-再测可靠性:结论:PAM-13-C 是衡量中国 CSCI 患者积极性的可靠而有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13) among individuals with chronic spinal cord injury in mainland China.

Context/objective: The 13-item Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13) is the most widely used generic patient activation measure, but spinal cord injury (SCI) related psychometric evaluation of PAM-13 has not been explored globally. This study aimed to assess the validity of the Chinese version of the PAM-13 (PAM-13-C) for individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (CSCI).

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center, and some participants were recruited in a WeChat group (the most commonly used social media platform in China).

Participants: 284 individuals with spinal cord injury who had lived with the injury for ≥0.5 year.

Interventions: NA.

Outcome measures: The PAM-13-C, global QoL, seven-item generalized anxiety disorder scale (GAD-7) and nine-item patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9), and General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) were used.

Results: The mean (SD) PAM-13-C score was 57.4 (16.5). The highest percentage of NA could be observed in item 9 (12.0%). Floor and ceiling effects of the total scores of PAM-13-C were small (0.7% and 6.7%), but a ceiling effect could be observed among all items. Exploratory Factor Analysis supported a one-factor model of the PAM-13-C (CFI = 0.97; RMSEA = 0.07). Construct validity was established through correlation analysis among the PAM-13-C, GAD-7/PHQ-9, global QoL, and GSES. The PAM-13-C demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.95) and acceptable test-retest reliability.

Conclusion: The PAM-13-C is a reliable and valid measure of patient activation for individuals with CSCI in China.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
期刊最新文献
Lower red blood cell count is a risk factor for higher D-dimer level in patients with spinal cord injury: A five year retrospective cross-sectional study. Changes in mood states during inpatient rehabilitation after spinal cord injury. Construct validity, responsiveness, and interpretability of the Spinal Cord Injury Functional Ambulation Inventory (SCI-FAI). Patient-reported effects of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation on spasticity in patients with spinal cord injury. Prescription opioid dispensing rates in the 12-months post-discharge after acute spinal cord injury: An observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1