Filipe Luis Souza , Murilo Schiefler Moura , Juliana Vieira Almeida Silva , Gary Elkins
{"title":"催眠治疗抑郁症:随机临床试验的系统回顾与荟萃分析。","authors":"Filipe Luis Souza , Murilo Schiefler Moura , Juliana Vieira Almeida Silva , Gary Elkins","doi":"10.1016/j.ctcp.2024.101913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is one of the most debilitating diseases worldwide and has seen a significant increase in diagnoses during the pandemic, demanding more and better therapeutic tools to manage the post-pandemic scenario.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this systematic review is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the last 20 years of clinical research on Hypnotherapy (HT) to determine whether this intervention has evidence to support its recommendation for the treatment of MDD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This review included only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving adult populations diagnosed with MDD, regardless of the severity level (mild, moderate, or severe) according to any validated diagnostic criteria, compared to a control group (active treatment or none), with any follow-up duration and free access to the manuscript. The bibliographic survey was conducted across seven distinct databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, Scopus, ScieELO, and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS). The risk of bias was assessed by two independent investigators using Cochrane's revised tool (RoB 2), and the final judgment was made by consensus. To better analyze the included studies, the certainty of the evidence was evaluated through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There is not enough evidence to indicate that hypnosis-based interventions may reduce the severity of depression, which precludes the clinical recommendation of this intervention for patients in the real world, pending the production of better evidence of effectiveness and safety, although no evidence of significant adverse effects was found.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48752,"journal":{"name":"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101913"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hypnosis for depression: Systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Filipe Luis Souza , Murilo Schiefler Moura , Juliana Vieira Almeida Silva , Gary Elkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctcp.2024.101913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is one of the most debilitating diseases worldwide and has seen a significant increase in diagnoses during the pandemic, demanding more and better therapeutic tools to manage the post-pandemic scenario.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this systematic review is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the last 20 years of clinical research on Hypnotherapy (HT) to determine whether this intervention has evidence to support its recommendation for the treatment of MDD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This review included only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving adult populations diagnosed with MDD, regardless of the severity level (mild, moderate, or severe) according to any validated diagnostic criteria, compared to a control group (active treatment or none), with any follow-up duration and free access to the manuscript. The bibliographic survey was conducted across seven distinct databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, Scopus, ScieELO, and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS). The risk of bias was assessed by two independent investigators using Cochrane's revised tool (RoB 2), and the final judgment was made by consensus. To better analyze the included studies, the certainty of the evidence was evaluated through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There is not enough evidence to indicate that hypnosis-based interventions may reduce the severity of depression, which precludes the clinical recommendation of this intervention for patients in the real world, pending the production of better evidence of effectiveness and safety, although no evidence of significant adverse effects was found.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101913\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744388124000860\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744388124000860","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:重度抑郁障碍(MDD)是全球最令人衰弱的疾病之一,在大流行期间,其诊断率显著上升,需要更多更好的治疗工具来应对大流行后的情况:本系统综述旨在对过去 20 年有关催眠疗法(HT)的临床研究进行全面分析,以确定这一干预措施是否有证据支持其治疗 MDD 的建议:本综述仅包括随机临床试验(RCT),涉及根据任何有效诊断标准被诊断为 MDD 的成人群体,无论其严重程度如何(轻度、中度或重度),与对照组(积极治疗或无治疗)进行比较,随访时间不限,稿件可自由获取。文献调查在七个不同的数据库中进行:MEDLINE (PubMed)、Embase、CENTRAL、PsycINFO、Scopus、ScieELO 和 Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS)。偏倚风险由两名独立研究人员使用科克伦修订工具(RoB 2)进行评估,并在达成共识的基础上做出最终判断。为了更好地分析纳入的研究,通过建议评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)对证据的确定性进行了评估:虽然没有发现明显的不良反应证据,但没有足够的证据表明基于催眠的干预措施可以减轻抑郁症的严重程度,因此在现实世界中,在没有更好的有效性和安全性证据之前,不能向患者临床推荐这种干预措施。
Hypnosis for depression: Systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis
Introduction
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is one of the most debilitating diseases worldwide and has seen a significant increase in diagnoses during the pandemic, demanding more and better therapeutic tools to manage the post-pandemic scenario.
Objective
The aim of this systematic review is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the last 20 years of clinical research on Hypnotherapy (HT) to determine whether this intervention has evidence to support its recommendation for the treatment of MDD.
Methods
This review included only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving adult populations diagnosed with MDD, regardless of the severity level (mild, moderate, or severe) according to any validated diagnostic criteria, compared to a control group (active treatment or none), with any follow-up duration and free access to the manuscript. The bibliographic survey was conducted across seven distinct databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, Scopus, ScieELO, and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS). The risk of bias was assessed by two independent investigators using Cochrane's revised tool (RoB 2), and the final judgment was made by consensus. To better analyze the included studies, the certainty of the evidence was evaluated through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).
Results
There is not enough evidence to indicate that hypnosis-based interventions may reduce the severity of depression, which precludes the clinical recommendation of this intervention for patients in the real world, pending the production of better evidence of effectiveness and safety, although no evidence of significant adverse effects was found.
期刊介绍:
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice is an internationally refereed journal published to meet the broad ranging needs of the healthcare profession in the effective and professional integration of complementary therapies within clinical practice.
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice aims to provide rigorous peer reviewed papers addressing research, implementation of complementary therapies (CTs) in the clinical setting, legal and ethical concerns, evaluative accounts of therapy in practice, philosophical analysis of emergent social trends in CTs, excellence in clinical judgement, best practice, problem management, therapy information, policy development and management of change in order to promote safe and efficacious clinical practice.
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice welcomes and considers accounts of reflective practice.