催眠治疗抑郁症:随机临床试验的系统回顾与荟萃分析。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1016/j.ctcp.2024.101913
Filipe Luis Souza , Murilo Schiefler Moura , Juliana Vieira Almeida Silva , Gary Elkins
{"title":"催眠治疗抑郁症:随机临床试验的系统回顾与荟萃分析。","authors":"Filipe Luis Souza ,&nbsp;Murilo Schiefler Moura ,&nbsp;Juliana Vieira Almeida Silva ,&nbsp;Gary Elkins","doi":"10.1016/j.ctcp.2024.101913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is one of the most debilitating diseases worldwide and has seen a significant increase in diagnoses during the pandemic, demanding more and better therapeutic tools to manage the post-pandemic scenario.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this systematic review is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the last 20 years of clinical research on Hypnotherapy (HT) to determine whether this intervention has evidence to support its recommendation for the treatment of MDD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This review included only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving adult populations diagnosed with MDD, regardless of the severity level (mild, moderate, or severe) according to any validated diagnostic criteria, compared to a control group (active treatment or none), with any follow-up duration and free access to the manuscript. The bibliographic survey was conducted across seven distinct databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, Scopus, ScieELO, and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS). The risk of bias was assessed by two independent investigators using Cochrane's revised tool (RoB 2), and the final judgment was made by consensus. To better analyze the included studies, the certainty of the evidence was evaluated through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There is not enough evidence to indicate that hypnosis-based interventions may reduce the severity of depression, which precludes the clinical recommendation of this intervention for patients in the real world, pending the production of better evidence of effectiveness and safety, although no evidence of significant adverse effects was found.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48752,"journal":{"name":"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101913"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hypnosis for depression: Systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Filipe Luis Souza ,&nbsp;Murilo Schiefler Moura ,&nbsp;Juliana Vieira Almeida Silva ,&nbsp;Gary Elkins\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctcp.2024.101913\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is one of the most debilitating diseases worldwide and has seen a significant increase in diagnoses during the pandemic, demanding more and better therapeutic tools to manage the post-pandemic scenario.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this systematic review is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the last 20 years of clinical research on Hypnotherapy (HT) to determine whether this intervention has evidence to support its recommendation for the treatment of MDD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This review included only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving adult populations diagnosed with MDD, regardless of the severity level (mild, moderate, or severe) according to any validated diagnostic criteria, compared to a control group (active treatment or none), with any follow-up duration and free access to the manuscript. The bibliographic survey was conducted across seven distinct databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, Scopus, ScieELO, and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS). The risk of bias was assessed by two independent investigators using Cochrane's revised tool (RoB 2), and the final judgment was made by consensus. To better analyze the included studies, the certainty of the evidence was evaluated through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There is not enough evidence to indicate that hypnosis-based interventions may reduce the severity of depression, which precludes the clinical recommendation of this intervention for patients in the real world, pending the production of better evidence of effectiveness and safety, although no evidence of significant adverse effects was found.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101913\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744388124000860\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1744388124000860","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:重度抑郁障碍(MDD)是全球最令人衰弱的疾病之一,在大流行期间,其诊断率显著上升,需要更多更好的治疗工具来应对大流行后的情况:本系统综述旨在对过去 20 年有关催眠疗法(HT)的临床研究进行全面分析,以确定这一干预措施是否有证据支持其治疗 MDD 的建议:本综述仅包括随机临床试验(RCT),涉及根据任何有效诊断标准被诊断为 MDD 的成人群体,无论其严重程度如何(轻度、中度或重度),与对照组(积极治疗或无治疗)进行比较,随访时间不限,稿件可自由获取。文献调查在七个不同的数据库中进行:MEDLINE (PubMed)、Embase、CENTRAL、PsycINFO、Scopus、ScieELO 和 Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS)。偏倚风险由两名独立研究人员使用科克伦修订工具(RoB 2)进行评估,并在达成共识的基础上做出最终判断。为了更好地分析纳入的研究,通过建议评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)对证据的确定性进行了评估:虽然没有发现明显的不良反应证据,但没有足够的证据表明基于催眠的干预措施可以减轻抑郁症的严重程度,因此在现实世界中,在没有更好的有效性和安全性证据之前,不能向患者临床推荐这种干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hypnosis for depression: Systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis

Introduction

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is one of the most debilitating diseases worldwide and has seen a significant increase in diagnoses during the pandemic, demanding more and better therapeutic tools to manage the post-pandemic scenario.

Objective

The aim of this systematic review is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the last 20 years of clinical research on Hypnotherapy (HT) to determine whether this intervention has evidence to support its recommendation for the treatment of MDD.

Methods

This review included only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving adult populations diagnosed with MDD, regardless of the severity level (mild, moderate, or severe) according to any validated diagnostic criteria, compared to a control group (active treatment or none), with any follow-up duration and free access to the manuscript. The bibliographic survey was conducted across seven distinct databases: MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, Scopus, ScieELO, and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS). The risk of bias was assessed by two independent investigators using Cochrane's revised tool (RoB 2), and the final judgment was made by consensus. To better analyze the included studies, the certainty of the evidence was evaluated through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

Results

There is not enough evidence to indicate that hypnosis-based interventions may reduce the severity of depression, which precludes the clinical recommendation of this intervention for patients in the real world, pending the production of better evidence of effectiveness and safety, although no evidence of significant adverse effects was found.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
157
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice is an internationally refereed journal published to meet the broad ranging needs of the healthcare profession in the effective and professional integration of complementary therapies within clinical practice. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice aims to provide rigorous peer reviewed papers addressing research, implementation of complementary therapies (CTs) in the clinical setting, legal and ethical concerns, evaluative accounts of therapy in practice, philosophical analysis of emergent social trends in CTs, excellence in clinical judgement, best practice, problem management, therapy information, policy development and management of change in order to promote safe and efficacious clinical practice. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice welcomes and considers accounts of reflective practice.
期刊最新文献
Associations of physical activity, screen time, sleep duration with optimal eating habits among adolescents Practitioner characteristics of osteopaths who treat pregnant women and children: An Australasian perspective from two practice-based research networks Effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on venous thromboprophylaxis in surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis “There is a way to work together”: A qualitative study on complementary medicine therapists' perceptions of their role in the Swiss healthcare system Effects of mind-body exercise in children with cerebral palsy—A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1