医疗保险优势计划(Medicare Advantage)中有就医困难的人群利用初级保健远程医疗的情况。

Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2024-09-28 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxae120
Emily Boudreau, Amanda Sutherland, Debra Bozzi, Melanie Canterberry, Gosia Sylwestrzak
{"title":"医疗保险优势计划(Medicare Advantage)中有就医困难的人群利用初级保健远程医疗的情况。","authors":"Emily Boudreau, Amanda Sutherland, Debra Bozzi, Melanie Canterberry, Gosia Sylwestrzak","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although telehealth utilization in primary care has decreased markedly since 2020, it remains higher than before the COVID-19 pandemic. There is debate about its role in a post-pandemic healthcare system, particularly for certain groups of patients that may experience greater access challenges related to in-person care. To inform this debate, we examined the use of audiovisual telehealth for primary care as a share of total primary care outpatient visits among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with and without 3 characteristics associated with potential access challenges (low-income status, disability, and frailty). Primary care visits when the beneficiary was frail were 39.4% (OR: 1.39 [95% CI, 1.37-1.42]) more likely to be telehealth; when the beneficiary was disabled or low-income status, visits were 20.1% (OR: 1.20 [95% CI, 1.18-1.22]) and 8.3% (OR: 1.08 [95% CI, 1.05-1.12]) more likely to be telehealth, respectively. The differential use of telehealth among beneficiaries with low-income status or disability, compared with those without, was significantly larger among providers with a 2-sided risk contract compared with fee for service (low-income status: OR: 1.19 [95% CI, 1.04-1.35]; disability: OR: 1.07 [95% CI, 1.01-1.13]).</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"2 10","pages":"qxae120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11465365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primary care telehealth utilization by access-challenged populations in Medicare Advantage.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Boudreau, Amanda Sutherland, Debra Bozzi, Melanie Canterberry, Gosia Sylwestrzak\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/haschl/qxae120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although telehealth utilization in primary care has decreased markedly since 2020, it remains higher than before the COVID-19 pandemic. There is debate about its role in a post-pandemic healthcare system, particularly for certain groups of patients that may experience greater access challenges related to in-person care. To inform this debate, we examined the use of audiovisual telehealth for primary care as a share of total primary care outpatient visits among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with and without 3 characteristics associated with potential access challenges (low-income status, disability, and frailty). Primary care visits when the beneficiary was frail were 39.4% (OR: 1.39 [95% CI, 1.37-1.42]) more likely to be telehealth; when the beneficiary was disabled or low-income status, visits were 20.1% (OR: 1.20 [95% CI, 1.18-1.22]) and 8.3% (OR: 1.08 [95% CI, 1.05-1.12]) more likely to be telehealth, respectively. The differential use of telehealth among beneficiaries with low-income status or disability, compared with those without, was significantly larger among providers with a 2-sided risk contract compared with fee for service (low-income status: OR: 1.19 [95% CI, 1.04-1.35]; disability: OR: 1.07 [95% CI, 1.01-1.13]).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health affairs scholar\",\"volume\":\"2 10\",\"pages\":\"qxae120\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11465365/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health affairs scholar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae120\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管自 2020 年以来远程医疗在初级保健中的使用率明显下降,但仍高于 COVID-19 大流行之前。关于远程医疗在大流行后医疗保健系统中的作用,特别是对于某些可能会面临更多亲自就医挑战的患者群体而言,还存在争议。为了给这一争论提供信息,我们研究了视听远程医疗在医疗保险优势受益人初级保健门诊总就诊人次中所占的比例,无论受益人是否具有与潜在就诊挑战相关的三个特征(低收入状况、残疾和体弱)。当受益人体弱时,39.4%(OR:1.39 [95% CI,1.37-1.42])的初级保健门诊更有可能采用远程保健;当受益人残疾或低收入时,20.1%(OR:1.20 [95% CI,1.18-1.22])和 8.3%(OR:1.08 [95% CI,1.05-1.12])的门诊更有可能采用远程保健。与收费服务相比,在签订了双面风险合同的医疗服务提供者中,低收入或残疾受益人与非低收入或残疾受益人使用远程医疗的差异明显更大(低收入状况:OR:1.19 [95% CI];非低收入状况:OR:1.19 [95% CI]):OR: 1.19 [95% CI, 1.04-1.35]; disability:OR:1.07 [95% CI,1.01-1.13])。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Primary care telehealth utilization by access-challenged populations in Medicare Advantage.

Although telehealth utilization in primary care has decreased markedly since 2020, it remains higher than before the COVID-19 pandemic. There is debate about its role in a post-pandemic healthcare system, particularly for certain groups of patients that may experience greater access challenges related to in-person care. To inform this debate, we examined the use of audiovisual telehealth for primary care as a share of total primary care outpatient visits among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with and without 3 characteristics associated with potential access challenges (low-income status, disability, and frailty). Primary care visits when the beneficiary was frail were 39.4% (OR: 1.39 [95% CI, 1.37-1.42]) more likely to be telehealth; when the beneficiary was disabled or low-income status, visits were 20.1% (OR: 1.20 [95% CI, 1.18-1.22]) and 8.3% (OR: 1.08 [95% CI, 1.05-1.12]) more likely to be telehealth, respectively. The differential use of telehealth among beneficiaries with low-income status or disability, compared with those without, was significantly larger among providers with a 2-sided risk contract compared with fee for service (low-income status: OR: 1.19 [95% CI, 1.04-1.35]; disability: OR: 1.07 [95% CI, 1.01-1.13]).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correction to: No Surprises Act independent dispute resolution outcomes for emergency services. All-cause nursing home mortality rates have remained above pre-pandemic levels after accounting for decline in occupancy. Charting new territory: the early lessons in integrating social determinant of health (SDOH) measures into practice. Scenarios, not shortage forecasts, are key to better workforce policy. Factors impacting vaccine uptake among adult Medicaid beneficiaries: a systematic literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1