Miranda K Branyiczky, Shahnawaz Towheed, Tiago Torres, Ronald Vender
{"title":"近期针对掌跖脓疱病随机对照试验的系统回顾。","authors":"Miranda K Branyiczky, Shahnawaz Towheed, Tiago Torres, Ronald Vender","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2024.2414048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a chronic inflammatory condition, that leads to significant functional impairment and reduced quality of life. Despite its low incidence, treatment options are diverse and often ineffective, necessitating a review of recent therapeutic advances.</p><p><p><b>Objective:</b> This review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of recent therapeutic options for the treatment of PPP, focusing on phototherapy, systemic therapies, and biologics.</p><p><p><b>Materials and methods:</b> A systematic literature search identified 13 studies evaluating phototherapy and systemic therapies, including biologics. Inclusion criteria focused on randomized controlled trials with participants diagnosed with PPP.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Phototherapy showed success: excimer laser demonstrated high efficacy for severe disease [PPP Area and Severity Index (PPPASI)-75 of 95.0%], while psoralen plus ultraviolet A therapy with retinoids or fumaric acid esters worked well in milder disease (PPPASI-90 of 90.0 and 81.8%, respectively). Evidence supports the efficacy and safety of guselkumab, brodalumab, and apremilast over a range of disease severity (PPPASI-50 ranged from 57.4 to 78.3% at week 16). Agents including anakinra, secukinumab, spesolimab, and RIST4721 (primary outcomes not achieved) may not be first-line treatments. By targeting multiple inflammatory pathways in PPP, JAK inhibitors may be more effective than biologics in treating PPP; however, more research is needed to confirm their safety and appropriate use.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Multiple new treatments exist for PPP with promising results, however longer-term studies with standardized outcome reporting are needed to determine optimal treatment strategies and their comparative efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","volume":"35 1","pages":"2414048"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review of recent randomized controlled trials for palmoplantar pustulosis.\",\"authors\":\"Miranda K Branyiczky, Shahnawaz Towheed, Tiago Torres, Ronald Vender\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09546634.2024.2414048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a chronic inflammatory condition, that leads to significant functional impairment and reduced quality of life. Despite its low incidence, treatment options are diverse and often ineffective, necessitating a review of recent therapeutic advances.</p><p><p><b>Objective:</b> This review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of recent therapeutic options for the treatment of PPP, focusing on phototherapy, systemic therapies, and biologics.</p><p><p><b>Materials and methods:</b> A systematic literature search identified 13 studies evaluating phototherapy and systemic therapies, including biologics. Inclusion criteria focused on randomized controlled trials with participants diagnosed with PPP.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Phototherapy showed success: excimer laser demonstrated high efficacy for severe disease [PPP Area and Severity Index (PPPASI)-75 of 95.0%], while psoralen plus ultraviolet A therapy with retinoids or fumaric acid esters worked well in milder disease (PPPASI-90 of 90.0 and 81.8%, respectively). Evidence supports the efficacy and safety of guselkumab, brodalumab, and apremilast over a range of disease severity (PPPASI-50 ranged from 57.4 to 78.3% at week 16). Agents including anakinra, secukinumab, spesolimab, and RIST4721 (primary outcomes not achieved) may not be first-line treatments. By targeting multiple inflammatory pathways in PPP, JAK inhibitors may be more effective than biologics in treating PPP; however, more research is needed to confirm their safety and appropriate use.</p><p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> Multiple new treatments exist for PPP with promising results, however longer-term studies with standardized outcome reporting are needed to determine optimal treatment strategies and their comparative efficacy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of dermatological treatment\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"2414048\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of dermatological treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2024.2414048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2024.2414048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A systematic review of recent randomized controlled trials for palmoplantar pustulosis.
Background: Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) is a chronic inflammatory condition, that leads to significant functional impairment and reduced quality of life. Despite its low incidence, treatment options are diverse and often ineffective, necessitating a review of recent therapeutic advances.
Objective: This review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of recent therapeutic options for the treatment of PPP, focusing on phototherapy, systemic therapies, and biologics.
Materials and methods: A systematic literature search identified 13 studies evaluating phototherapy and systemic therapies, including biologics. Inclusion criteria focused on randomized controlled trials with participants diagnosed with PPP.
Results: Phototherapy showed success: excimer laser demonstrated high efficacy for severe disease [PPP Area and Severity Index (PPPASI)-75 of 95.0%], while psoralen plus ultraviolet A therapy with retinoids or fumaric acid esters worked well in milder disease (PPPASI-90 of 90.0 and 81.8%, respectively). Evidence supports the efficacy and safety of guselkumab, brodalumab, and apremilast over a range of disease severity (PPPASI-50 ranged from 57.4 to 78.3% at week 16). Agents including anakinra, secukinumab, spesolimab, and RIST4721 (primary outcomes not achieved) may not be first-line treatments. By targeting multiple inflammatory pathways in PPP, JAK inhibitors may be more effective than biologics in treating PPP; however, more research is needed to confirm their safety and appropriate use.
Conclusions: Multiple new treatments exist for PPP with promising results, however longer-term studies with standardized outcome reporting are needed to determine optimal treatment strategies and their comparative efficacy.