澳大利亚新南威尔士州地区土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民年轻人获得性健康和生殖健康服务的情况

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health & Social Care in the Community Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1155/2024/1845971
Kate Whitford, Bobby Whybrow, Bridget Haire, Alison Nikitas, Samantha Williams, Robert Monaghan, Lise Lafferty
{"title":"澳大利亚新南威尔士州地区土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民年轻人获得性健康和生殖健康服务的情况","authors":"Kate Whitford,&nbsp;Bobby Whybrow,&nbsp;Bridget Haire,&nbsp;Alison Nikitas,&nbsp;Samantha Williams,&nbsp;Robert Monaghan,&nbsp;Lise Lafferty","doi":"10.1155/2024/1845971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Owing to the historical and ongoing impacts of colonisation, there is a large health equity gap in sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and non-Indigenous populations. Whilst qualitative research has identified the barriers and enablers to sexual healthcare engagement among young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in remote settings, little is known about the ways in which young people navigate sexual healthcare in a regional setting. This study aims to address this gap. Sixty-five young (aged 15–29) Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people participated in semistructured interviews across three regional communities in New South Wales, Australia. The candidacy framework informed this analysis. A large proportion of participants expressed having agency and resources to attend health services for SRH needs (primarily STI testing and contraception). Women in particular described being supported by social networks to access SRH services. Male participants were less likely to identify their own candidacy for healthcare. Services that were culturally safe and had trustworthy, nonjudgemental staff and a feeling of community were easier to access (more permeable). Factors that decreased accessibility were confidentiality concerns, difficulty making appointments, and lack of visibility of services, or what they offer. Using the candidacy framework, this study identified the importance of culturally safe service provision, reducing barriers to accessing appointments and the provision of nonjudgemental care in engaging young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in SRH care. This study also highlighted the various strategies and actions that young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are already taking to protect their sexual health and that of their partners.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/1845971","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sexual and Reproductive Health Service Access among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Young People in Regional NSW, Australia\",\"authors\":\"Kate Whitford,&nbsp;Bobby Whybrow,&nbsp;Bridget Haire,&nbsp;Alison Nikitas,&nbsp;Samantha Williams,&nbsp;Robert Monaghan,&nbsp;Lise Lafferty\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/1845971\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>Owing to the historical and ongoing impacts of colonisation, there is a large health equity gap in sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and non-Indigenous populations. Whilst qualitative research has identified the barriers and enablers to sexual healthcare engagement among young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in remote settings, little is known about the ways in which young people navigate sexual healthcare in a regional setting. This study aims to address this gap. Sixty-five young (aged 15–29) Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people participated in semistructured interviews across three regional communities in New South Wales, Australia. The candidacy framework informed this analysis. A large proportion of participants expressed having agency and resources to attend health services for SRH needs (primarily STI testing and contraception). Women in particular described being supported by social networks to access SRH services. Male participants were less likely to identify their own candidacy for healthcare. Services that were culturally safe and had trustworthy, nonjudgemental staff and a feeling of community were easier to access (more permeable). Factors that decreased accessibility were confidentiality concerns, difficulty making appointments, and lack of visibility of services, or what they offer. Using the candidacy framework, this study identified the importance of culturally safe service provision, reducing barriers to accessing appointments and the provision of nonjudgemental care in engaging young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in SRH care. This study also highlighted the various strategies and actions that young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are already taking to protect their sexual health and that of their partners.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health & Social Care in the Community\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/1845971\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health & Social Care in the Community\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/1845971\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/1845971","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于殖民化的历史和持续影响,土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民与非土著居民之间在性健康和生殖健康(SRH)结果方面存在巨大的健康公平差距。虽然定性研究已经确定了偏远地区土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民年轻人参与性医疗保健的障碍和促进因素,但人们对年轻人在地区环境中获得性医疗保健的方式知之甚少。本研究旨在填补这一空白。65 名年轻的土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民(15-29 岁)参加了澳大利亚新南威尔士州三个地区社区的半结构式访谈。候选资格框架为本分析提供了依据。很大一部分参与者表示,他们有能力和资源去医疗机构满足性健康和生殖健康方面的需求(主要是性传播感染检测和避孕)。尤其是女性,她们表示在获得性健康和生殖健康服务方面得到了社会网络的支持。男性参与者不太可能确定自己的医疗保健候选资格。文化上安全、工作人员值得信赖、不做评判、有社区感的服务更容易获得(渗透性更强)。降低可及性的因素包括保密问题、预约困难、服务或服务内容缺乏可见性。本研究利用候选框架,确定了提供文化安全服务、减少预约障碍以及提供非评判性护理对于吸引年轻土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民参与性健康和生殖健康护理的重要性。这项研究还强调了土著居民和托雷斯海峡岛民青年为保护自己及其伴侣的性健康而采取的各种策略和行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sexual and Reproductive Health Service Access among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Young People in Regional NSW, Australia

Owing to the historical and ongoing impacts of colonisation, there is a large health equity gap in sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and non-Indigenous populations. Whilst qualitative research has identified the barriers and enablers to sexual healthcare engagement among young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in remote settings, little is known about the ways in which young people navigate sexual healthcare in a regional setting. This study aims to address this gap. Sixty-five young (aged 15–29) Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people participated in semistructured interviews across three regional communities in New South Wales, Australia. The candidacy framework informed this analysis. A large proportion of participants expressed having agency and resources to attend health services for SRH needs (primarily STI testing and contraception). Women in particular described being supported by social networks to access SRH services. Male participants were less likely to identify their own candidacy for healthcare. Services that were culturally safe and had trustworthy, nonjudgemental staff and a feeling of community were easier to access (more permeable). Factors that decreased accessibility were confidentiality concerns, difficulty making appointments, and lack of visibility of services, or what they offer. Using the candidacy framework, this study identified the importance of culturally safe service provision, reducing barriers to accessing appointments and the provision of nonjudgemental care in engaging young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in SRH care. This study also highlighted the various strategies and actions that young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are already taking to protect their sexual health and that of their partners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues
期刊最新文献
Adapting Homelessness Interventions for People Who Use Drugs or Alcohol in Montreal, Quebec: Service User Perspectives “Get High With a Conscience”: Information and Communication Technologies and Sexualized Drug Use Among Gay Men in Mexico Stressors, Positive and Negative Caregiving Appraisals, and Caregiver Psychological Well-Being: The Moderating Role of Stages of Dementia A Multiple Case Study Exploring Person-Centred Care in Care Homes The Impact of Family Physician Contracting on Healthcare Costs: Evidence From Patients With Chronic Diseases at the Community Level From Beijing in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1